Shared Decision-Making for Nursing Practice: An Integrative Review.

Q3 Nursing Open Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2018-01-22 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874434601812010001
Marie Truglio-Londrigan, Jason T Slyer
{"title":"Shared Decision-Making for Nursing Practice: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Marie Truglio-Londrigan, Jason T Slyer","doi":"10.2174/1874434601812010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making has received national and international interest by providers, educators, researchers, and policy makers. The literature on shared decision-making is extensive, dealing with the individual components of shared decision-making rather than a comprehensive process. This view of shared decision-making leaves healthcare providers to wonder how to integrate shared decision-making into practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand shared decision-making as a comprehensive process from the perspective of the patient and provider in all healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An integrative review was conducted applying a systematic approach involving a literature search, data evaluation, and data analysis. The search included articles from PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO from 1970 through 2016. Articles included quantitative experimental and non-experimental designs, qualitative, and theoretical articles about shared decision-making between all healthcare providers and patients in all healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two papers were included in this integrative review. Three categories emerged from the synthesis: (a) communication/ relationship building; (b) working towards a shared decision; and (c) action for shared decision-making. Each major theme contained sub-themes represented in the proposed visual representation for shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A comprehensive understanding of shared decision-making between the nurse and the patient was identified. A visual representation offers a guide that depicts shared decision-making as a process taking place during a healthcare encounter with implications for the continuation of shared decisions over time offering patients an opportunity to return to the nurse for reconsiderations of past shared decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":38868,"journal":{"name":"Open Nursing Journal","volume":"12 ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874434601812010001","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601812010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making has received national and international interest by providers, educators, researchers, and policy makers. The literature on shared decision-making is extensive, dealing with the individual components of shared decision-making rather than a comprehensive process. This view of shared decision-making leaves healthcare providers to wonder how to integrate shared decision-making into practice.

Objective: To understand shared decision-making as a comprehensive process from the perspective of the patient and provider in all healthcare settings.

Methods: An integrative review was conducted applying a systematic approach involving a literature search, data evaluation, and data analysis. The search included articles from PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO from 1970 through 2016. Articles included quantitative experimental and non-experimental designs, qualitative, and theoretical articles about shared decision-making between all healthcare providers and patients in all healthcare settings.

Results: Fifty-two papers were included in this integrative review. Three categories emerged from the synthesis: (a) communication/ relationship building; (b) working towards a shared decision; and (c) action for shared decision-making. Each major theme contained sub-themes represented in the proposed visual representation for shared decision-making.

Conclusion: A comprehensive understanding of shared decision-making between the nurse and the patient was identified. A visual representation offers a guide that depicts shared decision-making as a process taking place during a healthcare encounter with implications for the continuation of shared decisions over time offering patients an opportunity to return to the nurse for reconsiderations of past shared decisions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理实践中的共同决策:一项综合综述。
背景:共享决策已经引起了国内外提供者、教育工作者、研究人员和政策制定者的兴趣。关于共同决策的文献是广泛的,处理共同决策的个别组成部分,而不是一个全面的过程。这种共同决策的观点让医疗保健提供者想知道如何将共同决策整合到实践中。目的:了解共同决策作为一个全面的过程,从病人和提供者的角度来看,在所有医疗保健设置。方法:采用系统的方法,包括文献检索、资料评估和数据分析,进行综合评价。检索包括PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和PsycINFO从1970年到2016年的文章。文章包括定量实验和非实验设计、定性和理论文章,内容涉及所有医疗保健机构中所有医疗保健提供者和患者之间的共同决策。结果:本综合综述纳入了52篇论文。综合得出三个类别:(a)沟通/建立关系;(b)努力作出共同决定;(c)共同决策的行动。每个主要主题都包含在拟议的共同决策视觉表示中所代表的次级主题。结论:护士和患者对共同决策有了全面的了解。可视化表示提供了一个指南,将共同决策描述为在医疗保健遇到过程中发生的过程,这意味着随着时间的推移,共同决策的延续,为患者提供了一个回到护士那里重新考虑过去共同决策的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Nursing Journal
Open Nursing Journal Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Open Nursing Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited thematic issues in all areas of nursing. The Open Nursing Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide. We welcome papers related to nursing and midwifery, with specific relevance to health care practice, policy and research. We publish under the following themes: -Nursing and Midwifery practice -Education -Research methodology -Evidence based practice -New role in practice -Systematic reviews -Case studies -Ethical and professional issues -Management in health care -Sustainability in health and health care provision All authors should make clear how the implications of their paper for nursing, midwifery and health care practice. They should also clearly identify the ‘take home message’ from their paper.
期刊最新文献
Management Practices Promoting Sustained Implementation of the Quality Register Senior Alert for Older Adults in Municipal Care in Sweden. Nurse Managers' Emotional Intelligence and Effective Leadership: A Review of Current Evidence. Effectiveness of the "Create Sensitivity" Caring Model on Blood Glucose/ Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Depressive Symptoms and Complications Early after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Gender Differences. Persistent (Anxiety and Depression) Affected Academic Achievement and Absenteeism in Nursing Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1