A randomized controlled trial comparing home-based isometric handgrip exercise versus endurance training for blood pressure management

Karla Fabiana Goessler PhD , Roselien Buys PhD , Dieter VanderTrappen MSc , Lise Vanhumbeeck MSc , Veronique Ann Cornelissen PhD
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing home-based isometric handgrip exercise versus endurance training for blood pressure management","authors":"Karla Fabiana Goessler PhD ,&nbsp;Roselien Buys PhD ,&nbsp;Dieter VanderTrappen MSc ,&nbsp;Lise Vanhumbeeck MSc ,&nbsp;Veronique Ann Cornelissen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jash.2018.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Aerobic endurance exercise<span> (AEX) is an effective treatment<span><span> in the prevention and management of high blood pressure (BP). Growing evidence suggests potential benefits from isometric handgrip (IHG) exercise, which may promote similar or even larger reductions in BP than AEX. We compared the effects of home-based AEX and home-based IHG on BP. Sixty healthy individuals (31 men; mean age, 33.1 years; mean BP, 126.9 ± 1.6/84.7 ± 1.1 mm Hg) were randomized to IHG, AEX, or a control group. Both exercise interventions were performed in the home environment. The IHG group performed daily 4 × 2 minutes sustained grips at 30% of maximal volitional contraction. Participants in the AEX group were advised to perform at least 150 min/wk of aerobic exercise at moderate intensity. Outcome measurements were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks of follow-up. Compared with the control group, AEX resulted in a larger reduction in </span>ambulatory BP; both AEX and IHG exercise tended to induce larger reductions in office </span></span></span>systolic BP<span>, and office diastolic BP was significantly more reduced after AEX but not IHG exercise. Responses to training were not significantly different between both the exercise interventions. Eight weeks of home-based AEX results in significant reductions in both ambulatory BP and office BP in healthy adults, whereas IHG reduces only office BP.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":17220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jash.2018.01.007","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933171118300081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Aerobic endurance exercise (AEX) is an effective treatment in the prevention and management of high blood pressure (BP). Growing evidence suggests potential benefits from isometric handgrip (IHG) exercise, which may promote similar or even larger reductions in BP than AEX. We compared the effects of home-based AEX and home-based IHG on BP. Sixty healthy individuals (31 men; mean age, 33.1 years; mean BP, 126.9 ± 1.6/84.7 ± 1.1 mm Hg) were randomized to IHG, AEX, or a control group. Both exercise interventions were performed in the home environment. The IHG group performed daily 4 × 2 minutes sustained grips at 30% of maximal volitional contraction. Participants in the AEX group were advised to perform at least 150 min/wk of aerobic exercise at moderate intensity. Outcome measurements were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks of follow-up. Compared with the control group, AEX resulted in a larger reduction in ambulatory BP; both AEX and IHG exercise tended to induce larger reductions in office systolic BP, and office diastolic BP was significantly more reduced after AEX but not IHG exercise. Responses to training were not significantly different between both the exercise interventions. Eight weeks of home-based AEX results in significant reductions in both ambulatory BP and office BP in healthy adults, whereas IHG reduces only office BP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项比较家庭等距握力训练与耐力训练对血压管理的随机对照试验
有氧耐力运动(AEX)是预防和治疗高血压(BP)的有效方法。越来越多的证据表明,等长握力(IHG)运动的潜在益处,与AEX相比,它可能促进类似甚至更大的血压降低。我们比较了家庭AEX和家庭IHG对血压的影响。60名健康个体(男性31名;平均年龄33.1岁;平均血压(126.9±1.6/84.7±1.1 mm Hg)随机分为IHG组、AEX组和对照组。两种运动干预都是在家庭环境中进行的。IHG组每日4 × 2分钟,持续握力为最大意志收缩的30%。AEX组的参与者被建议进行至少150分钟/周的中等强度有氧运动。结果测量在基线和8周随访时进行评估。与对照组相比,AEX使动态血压下降幅度更大;AEX和IHG运动都倾向于诱导更大程度的办公室收缩压降低,AEX运动后办公室舒张压明显降低,而IHG运动后没有。对训练的反应在两种运动干预之间没有显著差异。8周的家庭AEX治疗可显著降低健康成人的动态血压和办公室血压,而IHG仅降低办公室血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. The Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (JASH) publishes peer-reviewed articles on the topics of basic, applied and translational research on blood pressure, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders and factors; as well as clinical research and clinical trials in hypertension. Original research studies, reviews, hypotheses, editorial commentary and special reports spanning the spectrum of human and experimental animal and tissue research will be considered. All research studies must have been conducted following animal welfare guidelines. Studies involving human subjects or tissues must have received approval of the appropriate institutional committee charged with oversight of human studies and informed consent must be obtained.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Instructions for Authors Clinical impact of dipping and nocturnal blood pressure patterns in newly diagnosed, never-treated patients with essential hypertension Association between resting heart rate and hypertension in Chinese with different waist-to-height ratio: a population-based cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1