Biologic Drugs, Biosimilars, and Barriers to Entry.

Joanna M Shepherd
{"title":"Biologic Drugs, Biosimilars, and Barriers to Entry.","authors":"Joanna M Shepherd","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biologic drugs represent an important new category of drugs in the effort to improve health outcomes in this country. Yet, these\ncutting-edge drugs are often cost prohibitive, preventing access for many Americans. Recognizing the need for more affordable, generic\nsubstitutes for biologic drugs—or biosimilars—Congress recently created a biosimilars approval pathway that would enable these\ncheaper biologic drugs to obtain FDA approval and reach patients more quickly. Unfortunately, original biologics manufacturers have\nsought to extend their current monopoly profits by erecting various legal and regulatory barriers to entry. Their legal maneuvers take\nmany forms, from delaying approval of safe biosimilars to abrogating previous commitments to international drug-naming protocols, and\neven circumventing Congressional intent for biosimilar substitution. Regrettably, these policies reduce competition in the market for\nbiologic drugs, impede drug innovation, increase drug costs, and limit patient access to these important medications. This article explores\nthe conflict between biologics and biosimilars, and the consequences that barriers to biosimilar entry in this market will create.</p>","PeriodicalId":73212,"journal":{"name":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biologic drugs represent an important new category of drugs in the effort to improve health outcomes in this country. Yet, these cutting-edge drugs are often cost prohibitive, preventing access for many Americans. Recognizing the need for more affordable, generic substitutes for biologic drugs—or biosimilars—Congress recently created a biosimilars approval pathway that would enable these cheaper biologic drugs to obtain FDA approval and reach patients more quickly. Unfortunately, original biologics manufacturers have sought to extend their current monopoly profits by erecting various legal and regulatory barriers to entry. Their legal maneuvers take many forms, from delaying approval of safe biosimilars to abrogating previous commitments to international drug-naming protocols, and even circumventing Congressional intent for biosimilar substitution. Regrettably, these policies reduce competition in the market for biologic drugs, impede drug innovation, increase drug costs, and limit patient access to these important medications. This article explores the conflict between biologics and biosimilars, and the consequences that barriers to biosimilar entry in this market will create.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物药物、生物仿制药和进入壁垒。
生物药物代表了一个重要的新类别的药物在努力改善健康结果在这个国家。然而,这些尖端药物往往价格高昂,许多美国人无法获得。国会认识到需要更多可负担得起的生物药物或生物仿制药的非专利替代品,最近制定了生物仿制药审批途径,使这些便宜的生物药物能够获得FDA的批准,并更快地到达患者手中。不幸的是,原始生物制剂制造商试图通过设置各种法律和监管壁垒来扩大他们目前的垄断利润。他们的法律手段有多种形式,从推迟批准安全的生物仿制药到废除之前对国际药物命名协议的承诺,甚至绕过国会对生物仿制药替代的意图。遗憾的是,这些政策减少了生物药物市场的竞争,阻碍了药物创新,增加了药物成本,并限制了患者获得这些重要药物的机会。本文探讨了生物制剂和生物仿制药之间的冲突,以及生物仿制药进入这个市场的障碍将产生的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity's Pandemic Distractions. Different but Same: A Call for a Joint Pro-Active Regulation of Cross-Border Egg and Surrogacy Markets. TANTAMOUNT TO FRAUD?: EXPLORING NON-DISCLOSURE OF GENETIC INFORMATION IN LIFE INSURANCE APPLICATIONS AS GROUNDS FOR POLICY RESCISSION. AMERICA NEEDS THE TREAT ACT: EXPANDING ACCESS TO EFFECTIVE MEDICATION FOR TREATING ADDICTION. FIRST Do No HARM: PROTECTING PATIENTS THROUGH IMMUNIZING HEALTH CARE WORKERS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1