{"title":"Medicaid and Migrant Farmworkers: Why the State Residency Requirement Presents a Significant Access Barrier and What States Should Do About It.","authors":"Malea Hetrick","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicaid is failing to meet the health needs of qualified migrant farmworkers because of their migratory lifestyle. This population\nmoves frequently, following various agricultural harvests, and the state residency requirements imposed by Medicaid create a significant\naccess barrier that most migrant farmworkers cannot overcome. Migrant farmworkers are unable to overcome the state residency\nrequirement for several reasons: language and cultural barriers, the difficulty in applying, and statutory impediments such as the five-year\nban and the proof-of-citizenship requirement. Several states have attempted to integrate migrant farmworkers into both their state-run\nMedicaid and general public health systems with varying degrees of success. Both Texas and Wisconsin have implemented creative\nsolutions to this Medicaid coverage problem and these existing models will be examined for both strengths and weaknesses. Finally, after\nassessing whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that a state provide U.S. citizen migrant\nfarmworkers with access to Medicaid despite their transient lifestyles, I will propose three possible solutions to the problem—the ACA\nMedicaid Expansion, a hybrid Wisconsin/Texas model, and individualized solutions tailored to each state.</p>","PeriodicalId":73212,"journal":{"name":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","volume":"25 ","pages":"437-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Medicaid is failing to meet the health needs of qualified migrant farmworkers because of their migratory lifestyle. This population
moves frequently, following various agricultural harvests, and the state residency requirements imposed by Medicaid create a significant
access barrier that most migrant farmworkers cannot overcome. Migrant farmworkers are unable to overcome the state residency
requirement for several reasons: language and cultural barriers, the difficulty in applying, and statutory impediments such as the five-year
ban and the proof-of-citizenship requirement. Several states have attempted to integrate migrant farmworkers into both their state-run
Medicaid and general public health systems with varying degrees of success. Both Texas and Wisconsin have implemented creative
solutions to this Medicaid coverage problem and these existing models will be examined for both strengths and weaknesses. Finally, after
assessing whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that a state provide U.S. citizen migrant
farmworkers with access to Medicaid despite their transient lifestyles, I will propose three possible solutions to the problem—the ACA
Medicaid Expansion, a hybrid Wisconsin/Texas model, and individualized solutions tailored to each state.