Effects of a lateral row anchor position on the suture holding strength of a double-row knotless fixation in rotator cuff repair.

Ahmet Emrah Acan, Onur Hapa, Levent Horoz, Aylin Kara, Hasan Havıtçıoğlu
{"title":"Effects of a lateral row anchor position on the suture holding strength of a double-row knotless fixation in rotator cuff repair.","authors":"Ahmet Emrah Acan,&nbsp;Onur Hapa,&nbsp;Levent Horoz,&nbsp;Aylin Kara,&nbsp;Hasan Havıtçıoğlu","doi":"10.5606/ehc.2018.57519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effects of anchor positions on the suture holding strength of a double-row knotless fixation in rotator cuff repair.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four different double-row fixation techniques were assessed. In group 1, a 15-mm-wide mattress suture was fixed using a knotless lateral row anchor, horizontal to the shaft. In group 2, the medial sutures were fixed with a 5-mm more lateral anchor that was placed at 45° to the long axis of the humeral shaft. In group 3, different from group 2, medial sutures were fixed with a 30-mm mattress suture width. In group 4, the mattress sutures coming from the medial row anchors were fixed to the 10-mm more lateral row, vertical to the long axis of the humeral shaft. The specimens were cyclically loaded from 10 N to 30 N at 0.5 Hz for 50 cycles, and then loaded to failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 4 had higher cyclic elongation values than group 1 (p=0.021) and group 3 (p=0.006). Group 1 had lower maximum load value than group 3 (p=0.011). Most of the specimens failed with suture ruptures. Unlike the other groups, none of the specimens in group 4 failed via a suture pull through the lateral anchor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A horizontal lateral row anchor positioned closer to the medial anchor resulted in less cyclic elongation when compared to a more vertically positioned lateral row anchor. The vertical or oblique positioning of the lateral row anchor did not result in any increase in the failure load value; however, the vertical placement prevented a suture pull through the lateral row anchor.</p>","PeriodicalId":50551,"journal":{"name":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2018.57519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of anchor positions on the suture holding strength of a double-row knotless fixation in rotator cuff repair.

Materials and methods: Four different double-row fixation techniques were assessed. In group 1, a 15-mm-wide mattress suture was fixed using a knotless lateral row anchor, horizontal to the shaft. In group 2, the medial sutures were fixed with a 5-mm more lateral anchor that was placed at 45° to the long axis of the humeral shaft. In group 3, different from group 2, medial sutures were fixed with a 30-mm mattress suture width. In group 4, the mattress sutures coming from the medial row anchors were fixed to the 10-mm more lateral row, vertical to the long axis of the humeral shaft. The specimens were cyclically loaded from 10 N to 30 N at 0.5 Hz for 50 cycles, and then loaded to failure.

Results: Group 4 had higher cyclic elongation values than group 1 (p=0.021) and group 3 (p=0.006). Group 1 had lower maximum load value than group 3 (p=0.011). Most of the specimens failed with suture ruptures. Unlike the other groups, none of the specimens in group 4 failed via a suture pull through the lateral anchor.

Conclusion: A horizontal lateral row anchor positioned closer to the medial anchor resulted in less cyclic elongation when compared to a more vertically positioned lateral row anchor. The vertical or oblique positioning of the lateral row anchor did not result in any increase in the failure load value; however, the vertical placement prevented a suture pull through the lateral row anchor.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧排锚定位置对肩袖修复中双排无节固定的缝线保持强度的影响。
目的:本研究旨在评估锚定位置对肩袖修复中双排无节固定的缝线保持强度的影响。材料和方法:评估四种不同的双排固定技术。在第1组,使用无结侧排锚固定15mm宽的床垫缝合线,与轴水平。在第2组中,内侧缝合线用与肱骨长轴45°的外侧锚钉固定5mm。3组与2组不同,内侧缝线以30 mm床垫缝线宽度固定。在第4组,将来自内侧排锚钉的床垫缝合线固定在10 mm以上的外侧排上,垂直于肱骨轴长轴。试样在0.5 Hz下从10 N到30 N循环加载50次,然后加载至破坏。结果:4组的循环伸长值高于1组(p=0.021)和3组(p=0.006)。组1最大负荷值低于组3 (p=0.011)。大多数标本因缝线断裂而失败。与其他组不同的是,第4组的标本都没有通过侧锚的缝线牵引失败。结论:与更垂直定位的侧排锚相比,靠近内侧锚的水平侧排锚可导致更少的循环伸长。侧排锚的垂直或斜向定位均未导致破坏荷载值的增加;然而,垂直位置阻止了缝线穿过外侧排锚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
43.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (formerly published as Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi) is the official publication of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is open access journal. The full text of the articles of the Journal is freely available without embargo since 1990. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is international, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of joint diseases and related surgey.
期刊最新文献
The effects of focal brain damage on fracture healing: An experimental rat study. Endoscopic treatment of bilateral hallux saltans in an ordinary woman. Median nerve and carpal tunnel volume changes after two different surgical methods: A comparative magnetic resonance imaging study of mini-open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The effect of pentoxifylline on Achilles tendon healing in tenotomized rabbits. Icariin promotes early and late stages of fracture healing in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1