Results of Kidney Transplantation from Expanded Criteria Donors: A Single-Center Experience.

IF 0.3 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-02-01
B Palkoci, M Vojtko, J Fialová, D Osinová, M Lajčiaková
{"title":"Results of Kidney Transplantation from Expanded Criteria Donors: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"B Palkoci,&nbsp;M Vojtko,&nbsp;J Fialová,&nbsp;D Osinová,&nbsp;M Lajčiaková","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collection of kidneys from extended criteria donors (ECD) with diagnosed brain-death forms a part of the collection program that increases the number of transplantations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the results of ECD with those of standard criteria donors (SCD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective analysis in a group of 156 kidney donors, we identified ECD donors. We detected the basic parameters of the donors before kidney collection, and then evaluated the function of the graft, the survival of the graft, and the survival of the patients after 1, 3, and 5 years of transplantation. The results were then compared with the function of the graft from those of SCD donors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ECD donors were significantly (p<0.001) older than the SCD donors. They had a higher body mass index (p=0.006) and prevalence of hypertension (p<0.001) and diabetes mellitus (p=0.004) compared to SCD donors. The graft function within the first 6 months and the survival of recipients in the first year of transplantation were significantly worse in ECD than in SCD groups (p=0.01, and 0.023, respectively). No difference in the graft survival was observed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The long-term function of the graft and survival of patients and grafts in recipients of kidneys from ECD donors are comparable to SCD donors. Exploitation of the given organs for transplantation is important due to the constantly increasing demand versus limited offer of organs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14242,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Collection of kidneys from extended criteria donors (ECD) with diagnosed brain-death forms a part of the collection program that increases the number of transplantations.

Objective: To compare the results of ECD with those of standard criteria donors (SCD).

Methods: In a retrospective analysis in a group of 156 kidney donors, we identified ECD donors. We detected the basic parameters of the donors before kidney collection, and then evaluated the function of the graft, the survival of the graft, and the survival of the patients after 1, 3, and 5 years of transplantation. The results were then compared with the function of the graft from those of SCD donors.

Results: The ECD donors were significantly (p<0.001) older than the SCD donors. They had a higher body mass index (p=0.006) and prevalence of hypertension (p<0.001) and diabetes mellitus (p=0.004) compared to SCD donors. The graft function within the first 6 months and the survival of recipients in the first year of transplantation were significantly worse in ECD than in SCD groups (p=0.01, and 0.023, respectively). No difference in the graft survival was observed between the two groups.

Conclusion: The long-term function of the graft and survival of patients and grafts in recipients of kidneys from ECD donors are comparable to SCD donors. Exploitation of the given organs for transplantation is important due to the constantly increasing demand versus limited offer of organs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩大标准供者肾移植的结果:单中心经验。
背景:从诊断为脑死亡的扩展标准供体(ECD)收集肾脏是增加移植数量的收集计划的一部分。目的:比较ECD与标准供体(SCD)的结果。方法:在一组156肾供者的回顾性分析中,我们确定了ECD供者。我们在取肾前检测供者的基本参数,然后评估移植物的功能、移植物的存活,以及移植后1年、3年和5年患者的存活。然后将结果与来自SCD供体的移植物的功能进行比较。结果:ECD供者与SCD供者肾脏移植的远期功能及患者和移植肾的存活相当。由于需求不断增加而器官供应有限,利用特定器官进行移植是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine (IJOTM) is a quarterly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research on transplantation. The scope of the journal includes organ and tissue donation, procurement and preservation; surgical techniques, innovations, and novelties in all aspects of transplantation; genomics and immunobiology; immunosuppressive drugs and pharmacology relevant to transplantation; graft survival and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure; clinical trials and population analyses in the field of transplantation; transplant complications; cell and tissue transplantation; infection; post-transplant malignancies; sociological and ethical issues and xenotransplantation.
期刊最新文献
Potential of Müller Glial Cells in Regeneration of Retina; Clinical and Molecular Approach. Stereological Evaluation of Rabbit Fetus Liver after Xenotransplantation of Human Wharton's Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. The lowest uric acid in kidney transplant and review of literature. Development of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Liver Transplant (FACT-LT) Scale. Bone Density Reduction and Its Associated Factors in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1