Effect of low-shrinkage monomers on the physicochemical properties of experimental composite resin.

Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2018-02-28 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23337931.2018.1444488
Jingwei He, Sufyan Garoushi, Pekka K Vallittu, Lippo Lassila
{"title":"Effect of low-shrinkage monomers on the physicochemical properties of experimental composite resin.","authors":"Jingwei He,&nbsp;Sufyan Garoushi,&nbsp;Pekka K Vallittu,&nbsp;Lippo Lassila","doi":"10.1080/23337931.2018.1444488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to determine whether novel experimental low-shrinkage dimethacrylate co-monomers could provide low polymerization shrinkage composites without sacrifice to degree of conversion, and mechanical properties of the composites. Experimental composites were prepared by mixing 28.6 wt% of bisphenol-A-glycidyl dimethacrylate based resin matrix (<i>bis</i>-GMA) with various weight-fractions of co-monomers; tricyclo decanedimethanol dacrylate (SR833s) and isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) to 71.4 wt% of particulate-fillers. A composite based on <i>bis</i>-GMA/TEGDMA (triethylene glycol dimethacrylate) was used as a control. Fracture toughness and flexural strength were determined for each experimental material following international standards. Degree of monomer-conversion (DC%) was determined by FTIR spectrometry. The volumetric shrinkage in percent was calculated as a buoyancy change in distilled water by means of the Archimedes' principle. Polymerization shrinkage-strain and -stress of the specimens were measured using the strain-gage technique and tensilometer, respectively with respect to time. Statistical analysis revealed that control group had the highest double-bond conversion (<i>p</i> < .05) among the experimental resins tested. All of the experimental composite resins had comparable flexural strength, modulus, and fracture toughness (<i>p</i> > .05). Volumetric shrinkage and shrinkage stress decreased with increasing IBOA concentration. Replacing TEGDMA with SR833s and IBOA can decrease the volumetric shrinkage, shrinkage strain, and shrinkage stress of composite resins without affecting the mechanical properties. However, the degree of conversion was also decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"4 1","pages":"30-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2018.1444488","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1444488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine whether novel experimental low-shrinkage dimethacrylate co-monomers could provide low polymerization shrinkage composites without sacrifice to degree of conversion, and mechanical properties of the composites. Experimental composites were prepared by mixing 28.6 wt% of bisphenol-A-glycidyl dimethacrylate based resin matrix (bis-GMA) with various weight-fractions of co-monomers; tricyclo decanedimethanol dacrylate (SR833s) and isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) to 71.4 wt% of particulate-fillers. A composite based on bis-GMA/TEGDMA (triethylene glycol dimethacrylate) was used as a control. Fracture toughness and flexural strength were determined for each experimental material following international standards. Degree of monomer-conversion (DC%) was determined by FTIR spectrometry. The volumetric shrinkage in percent was calculated as a buoyancy change in distilled water by means of the Archimedes' principle. Polymerization shrinkage-strain and -stress of the specimens were measured using the strain-gage technique and tensilometer, respectively with respect to time. Statistical analysis revealed that control group had the highest double-bond conversion (p < .05) among the experimental resins tested. All of the experimental composite resins had comparable flexural strength, modulus, and fracture toughness (p > .05). Volumetric shrinkage and shrinkage stress decreased with increasing IBOA concentration. Replacing TEGDMA with SR833s and IBOA can decrease the volumetric shrinkage, shrinkage strain, and shrinkage stress of composite resins without affecting the mechanical properties. However, the degree of conversion was also decreased.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收缩单体对实验性复合树脂理化性能的影响。
本研究旨在确定新型实验低收缩二甲基丙烯酸酯共单体能否在不牺牲转化率和复合材料力学性能的情况下提供低聚合收缩复合材料。将28.6 wt%的双酚- a -缩水甘油酯二甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂基质(bis-GMA)与不同重量分数的共聚物混合制备实验复合材料;三环癸二甲醇丙烯酸酯(SR833s)和丙烯酸异鸟酯(IBOA)为71.4 wt%的颗粒填料。以双gma /TEGDMA(三甘醇二甲基丙烯酸酯)为基础的复合材料作为对照。每种实验材料的断裂韧性和抗弯强度均按照国际标准进行测定。用红外光谱法测定了单体转化率(DC%)。用阿基米德原理计算蒸馏水的浮力变化来计算体积收缩率。采用应变片技术和拉力仪分别测量了试样的聚合收缩应变和收缩应力随时间的变化。统计分析显示,对照组的双键转化率最高(p p > 0.05)。体积收缩率和收缩应力随IBOA浓度的增加而减小。用SR833s和IBOA替代TEGDMA可以降低复合树脂的体积收缩率、收缩应变和收缩应力,而不影响复合树脂的力学性能。然而,转化程度也有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anti-demineralization effect of desensitizer containing copolymer and sodium fluoride on root dentin - a transverse microradiographic study. Fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth treated with a regenerative endodontic protocol. Debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate resin cemented to dentin. The effect of antimicrobial additives on the properties of dental glass-ionomer cements: a review. An in vitro model to assess effects of a desensitising agent on bacterial biofilm formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1