Improving the Measurement of Fertility Regulation Practices: Findings from Qualitative Research in Ghana.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1363/43e4517
Cicely Marston, Alicia Renedo, Gertrude Nsorma Nyaaba, Kazuyo Machiyama, Placide Tapsoba, John Cleland
{"title":"Improving the Measurement of Fertility Regulation Practices: Findings from Qualitative Research in Ghana.","authors":"Cicely Marston,&nbsp;Alicia Renedo,&nbsp;Gertrude Nsorma Nyaaba,&nbsp;Kazuyo Machiyama,&nbsp;Placide Tapsoba,&nbsp;John Cleland","doi":"10.1363/43e4517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>According to Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data, highly educated urban women in some West African countries simultaneously have low rates of both contraceptive use and fertility-suggesting that the DHS may not be capturing a complete picture of women's contraceptive practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with a total of 48 women aged 18-49 in Accra, Ghana, who had at least a secondary education to explore their reproductive lives and relationships, and their views on and use of fertility regulation strategies. Data were analyzed using iterative thematic techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women commonly reported using combinations of contraceptive methods, including \"counting days\" (using a calendar and the date of one's last menstrual period to estimate \"unsafe\" days-those on which the risk of conception is high), as well as withdrawal, condoms and frequent use of emergency contraceptive pills. Women described practicing \"periodic contraception\": for example, counting days to determine unsafe days and practicing contraception ad hoc on such days. Method use combinations varied from cycle to cycle-forming a \"mosaic\" of method use combinations over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fertility control strategies commonly reported by the study respondents-periodic contraception, and frequent use of traditional methods and emergency contraceptive pills-are likely not adequately captured in general surveys such as the DHS. Such surveys are also not well suited to measuring combinations of methods and mosaics of method combinations. New ways of capturing women's fertility regulation practices should be considered, including additional survey items, new question modules and specialist studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46940,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":"43 3","pages":"111-119"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1363/43e4517","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/43e4517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Context: According to Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data, highly educated urban women in some West African countries simultaneously have low rates of both contraceptive use and fertility-suggesting that the DHS may not be capturing a complete picture of women's contraceptive practices.

Methods: Individual in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with a total of 48 women aged 18-49 in Accra, Ghana, who had at least a secondary education to explore their reproductive lives and relationships, and their views on and use of fertility regulation strategies. Data were analyzed using iterative thematic techniques.

Results: Women commonly reported using combinations of contraceptive methods, including "counting days" (using a calendar and the date of one's last menstrual period to estimate "unsafe" days-those on which the risk of conception is high), as well as withdrawal, condoms and frequent use of emergency contraceptive pills. Women described practicing "periodic contraception": for example, counting days to determine unsafe days and practicing contraception ad hoc on such days. Method use combinations varied from cycle to cycle-forming a "mosaic" of method use combinations over time.

Conclusions: The fertility control strategies commonly reported by the study respondents-periodic contraception, and frequent use of traditional methods and emergency contraceptive pills-are likely not adequately captured in general surveys such as the DHS. Such surveys are also not well suited to measuring combinations of methods and mosaics of method combinations. New ways of capturing women's fertility regulation practices should be considered, including additional survey items, new question modules and specialist studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进生育调节实践的测量:来自加纳定性研究的结果。
背景:根据人口与健康调查(DHS)的数据,一些西非国家受过高等教育的城市妇女同时避孕药具使用率和生育率都很低,这表明人口与健康调查可能没有全面了解妇女的避孕做法。方法:对48名年龄在18-49岁、受过中等以上教育的加纳阿克拉妇女进行个人深度访谈和焦点小组讨论,探讨她们的生育生活和生育关系,以及她们对生育调节策略的看法和使用情况。使用迭代主题技术分析数据。结果:据报告,妇女通常使用多种避孕方法,包括“计算天数”(使用日历和最后一次月经的日期来估计“不安全”的日子,即受孕风险较高的日子),以及停药、使用避孕套和频繁使用紧急避孕药。妇女描述了实行“定期避孕”的情况:例如,计算天数以确定不安全的日子,并在这些日子实行临时避孕。方法使用组合因周期而异——随时间形成方法使用组合的“马赛克”。结论:研究受访者通常报告的生育控制策略——定期避孕、经常使用传统方法和紧急避孕药——可能没有在人口与健康调查等一般调查中得到充分体现。这种调查也不适合测量方法的组合和方法组合的马赛克。应考虑捕捉妇女生育调节做法的新方法,包括增加调查项目、新的问题模块和专家研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's Perspectives on Contraceptive-Induced Amenorrhea in Burkina Faso and Uganda. Provider and Women Characteristics as Risk Factors for Postpartum Copper IUD Expulsion and Discontinuation in Nepal. Assessing Readiness to Provide Comprehensive Abortion Care in the Democratic Republic of the Congo After Passage of the Maputo Protocol. An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan. Chilean Medical and Midwifery Faculty's Views on Conscientious Objection for Abortion Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1