Eslicarbazepine acetate in the treatment of adults with partial-onset epilepsy: an evidence-based review of efficacy, safety and place in therapy.

Core Evidence Pub Date : 2018-03-08 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CE.S142858
Simona Lattanzi, Francesco Brigo, Claudia Cagnetti, Alberto Verrotti, Gaetano Zaccara, Mauro Silvestrini
{"title":"Eslicarbazepine acetate in the treatment of adults with partial-onset epilepsy: an evidence-based review of efficacy, safety and place in therapy.","authors":"Simona Lattanzi, Francesco Brigo, Claudia Cagnetti, Alberto Verrotti, Gaetano Zaccara, Mauro Silvestrini","doi":"10.2147/CE.S142858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Up to 30% of the patients diagnosed with epilepsy will continue suffering from seizures despite treatment with antiepileptic drugs, either in monotherapy or polytherapy. Hence, there remains the need to develop new effective and well-tolerated therapies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of this article was to review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive treatment in adult patients with focal onset seizures.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>ESL is the newest, third-generation, single enantiomer member of the dibenzazepine family. Following oral administration, ESL is rapidly and extensively metabolized by hepatic first-pass hydrolysis to the active metabolite eslicarbazepine, which has linear, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and low potential for drug-drug interactions. Eslicarbazepine works as a competitive blocker of the voltage gated sodium channels; unlike carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC), it has a lower affinity for the resting state of the channels, and reduces their availability by selectively enhancing slow inactivation. Efficacy and safety of ESL have been assessed in four randomized, Phase III clinical trials: the median relative reduction in standardized seizure frequency was 33.4% and 37.8% in the ESL 800 and 1,200 mg daily dose groups, and the responder rates were 33.8% and 43.1%, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) increased with raising the dosage (ESL 400 mg: 63.8%, ESL 800 mg: 67.0%, ESL 1,200 mg: 73.1%). The TEAEs were generally mild to moderate in intensity, and the most common were dizziness, somnolence, headache and nausea. Open-label studies confirmed the findings from the pivotal trials and demonstrated sustained therapeutic effect of ESL over time and improvement of tolerability profile in patients switching from OXC/CBZ. No unexpected safety signals emerged over >5 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Once-daily adjunctive ESL at the doses of 800 and 1,200 mg was effective to reduce the seizure frequency and was fairly well tolerated in adults with focal onset epilepsy. Starting treatment at 400 mg/day, followed by 400 mg increments every 7-14 days, could provide the optimal balance of efficacy and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10764,"journal":{"name":"Core Evidence","volume":"13 ","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CE.S142858","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Core Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CE.S142858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Introduction: Up to 30% of the patients diagnosed with epilepsy will continue suffering from seizures despite treatment with antiepileptic drugs, either in monotherapy or polytherapy. Hence, there remains the need to develop new effective and well-tolerated therapies.

Aim: The objective of this article was to review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive treatment in adult patients with focal onset seizures.

Evidence review: ESL is the newest, third-generation, single enantiomer member of the dibenzazepine family. Following oral administration, ESL is rapidly and extensively metabolized by hepatic first-pass hydrolysis to the active metabolite eslicarbazepine, which has linear, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and low potential for drug-drug interactions. Eslicarbazepine works as a competitive blocker of the voltage gated sodium channels; unlike carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC), it has a lower affinity for the resting state of the channels, and reduces their availability by selectively enhancing slow inactivation. Efficacy and safety of ESL have been assessed in four randomized, Phase III clinical trials: the median relative reduction in standardized seizure frequency was 33.4% and 37.8% in the ESL 800 and 1,200 mg daily dose groups, and the responder rates were 33.8% and 43.1%, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) increased with raising the dosage (ESL 400 mg: 63.8%, ESL 800 mg: 67.0%, ESL 1,200 mg: 73.1%). The TEAEs were generally mild to moderate in intensity, and the most common were dizziness, somnolence, headache and nausea. Open-label studies confirmed the findings from the pivotal trials and demonstrated sustained therapeutic effect of ESL over time and improvement of tolerability profile in patients switching from OXC/CBZ. No unexpected safety signals emerged over >5 years of follow-up.

Conclusion: Once-daily adjunctive ESL at the doses of 800 and 1,200 mg was effective to reduce the seizure frequency and was fairly well tolerated in adults with focal onset epilepsy. Starting treatment at 400 mg/day, followed by 400 mg increments every 7-14 days, could provide the optimal balance of efficacy and tolerability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
醋酸埃斯卡巴西平治疗成人部分性癫痫:疗效、安全性和治疗地位的循证评价
导读:高达30%被诊断为癫痫的患者,尽管接受了抗癫痫药物治疗,无论是单药治疗还是多药治疗,仍会继续遭受癫痫发作的折磨。因此,仍然需要开发新的有效和耐受性良好的治疗方法。目的:本文的目的是回顾醋酸埃斯卡巴西平(ESL)作为辅助治疗局灶性癫痫发作成人患者的有效性和安全性的证据。证据回顾:ESL是最新的,第三代,单一对映体成员的二苯氮卓家族。口服给药后,ESL通过肝脏第一次水解迅速而广泛地代谢为活性代谢物eslicarbazepine,具有线性、剂量比例的药代动力学和低药物-药物相互作用的潜力。埃斯利卡巴西平作为电压门控钠通道的竞争性阻滞剂;与卡马西平(CBZ)和奥卡西平(OXC)不同,它对通道的静息状态具有较低的亲和力,并通过选择性地增强缓慢失活来降低通道的可用性。四项随机III期临床试验对ESL的疗效和安全性进行了评估:ESL 800和1200 mg每日剂量组标准化癫痫发作频率的中位相对降低率分别为33.4%和37.8%,应答率分别为33.8%和43.1%。治疗中出现的不良事件(teae)的发生率随着剂量的增加而增加(ESL 400 mg: 63.8%, ESL 800 mg: 67.0%, ESL 1200 mg: 73.1%)。teae的强度一般为轻度至中度,最常见的是头晕、嗜睡、头痛和恶心。开放标签研究证实了关键试验的发现,并证明ESL随着时间的推移持续治疗效果,并改善了OXC/CBZ患者的耐受性。在50年的随访中没有出现意外的安全信号。结论:成人局灶性癫痫患者每日一次800和1200 mg辅助ESL可有效降低癫痫发作频率,且耐受性良好。以400mg /天开始治疗,随后每7-14天增加400mg,可提供疗效和耐受性的最佳平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Core Evidence
Core Evidence PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Core Evidence evaluates the evidence underlying the potential place in therapy of drugs throughout their development lifecycle from preclinical to postlaunch. The focus of each review is to evaluate the case for a new drug or class in outcome terms in specific indications and patient groups The emerging evidence on new drugs is reviewed at key stages of development and evaluated against unmet needs
期刊最新文献
Riociguat in the Treatment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: An Evidence-Based Review of Its Place in Therapy. Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV): A Short Review on the Role of Netupitant-Palonosetron (NEPA). Vedolizumab in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: An Evidence-Based Review of Safety, Efficacy, and Place of Therapy. Apixaban: An Update of the Evidence for Its Place in the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Pertuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: an evidence-based review of its safety, efficacy, and place in therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1