Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer: Clinical impact and patient perspectives.

IF 5.1 Q1 ONCOLOGY Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2018-03-16 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LCTT.S129833
Elysia K Donovan, Anand Swaminath
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer: Clinical impact and patient perspectives.","authors":"Elysia K Donovan,&nbsp;Anand Swaminath","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S129833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a new technology in radiotherapy delivery, allowing for potentially curative treatment in many patients previously felt not to be candidates for radical surgical resection of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several studies have demonstrated very high local control rates using SBRT, and more recent data have suggested overall survival may approach that of surgery in operable patients. However, SBRT is not without unique toxicities, and the balance of toxicity, and effect on patient-reported quality of life need to be considered with respect to oncologic outcomes. We therefore aim to review SBRT in the context of important patient-related factors, including quality of life in several domains (and in comparison to other therapies such as conventional radiation, surgery, or no treatment). We will also describe scenarios in which SBRT may be reasonably offered (i.e. elderly patients and those with severe COPD), and where it may need to be approached with some caution due to increased risks of toxicity (i.e. tumor location, patients with interstitial lung disease). In total, we hope to characterize the physical, emotional, and functional consequences of SBRT, in relation to other management strategies, in order to aid the clinician in deciding whether SBRT is the optimal treatment choice for each patient with early stage NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S129833","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S129833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a new technology in radiotherapy delivery, allowing for potentially curative treatment in many patients previously felt not to be candidates for radical surgical resection of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several studies have demonstrated very high local control rates using SBRT, and more recent data have suggested overall survival may approach that of surgery in operable patients. However, SBRT is not without unique toxicities, and the balance of toxicity, and effect on patient-reported quality of life need to be considered with respect to oncologic outcomes. We therefore aim to review SBRT in the context of important patient-related factors, including quality of life in several domains (and in comparison to other therapies such as conventional radiation, surgery, or no treatment). We will also describe scenarios in which SBRT may be reasonably offered (i.e. elderly patients and those with severe COPD), and where it may need to be approached with some caution due to increased risks of toxicity (i.e. tumor location, patients with interstitial lung disease). In total, we hope to characterize the physical, emotional, and functional consequences of SBRT, in relation to other management strategies, in order to aid the clinician in deciding whether SBRT is the optimal treatment choice for each patient with early stage NSCLC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)在非小细胞肺癌的治疗:临床影响和患者观点。
立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)作为一种新的放射治疗技术,为许多以前认为不适合I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)根治性手术切除的患者提供了潜在的根治性治疗。几项研究表明,SBRT的局部控制率非常高,最近的数据表明,可手术患者的总生存率可能接近手术。然而,SBRT并非没有独特的毒性,毒性的平衡以及对患者报告的生活质量的影响需要考虑到肿瘤预后。因此,我们的目标是在重要的患者相关因素的背景下回顾SBRT,包括几个领域的生活质量(并与其他疗法如传统放疗、手术或不治疗进行比较)。我们还将描述SBRT可能合理提供的情况(即老年患者和严重COPD患者),以及由于毒性风险增加而可能需要谨慎处理的情况(即肿瘤位置,间质性肺疾病患者)。总的来说,我们希望描述SBRT的身体、情绪和功能后果,以及与其他管理策略的关系,以帮助临床医生决定SBRT是否是每个早期NSCLC患者的最佳治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Spindle Cell Carcinoma Mimicking Granulomatous Inflammation: A Rare Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature. Redefining Recovery: The Transformative Impact of the ALINA Trial on Adjuvant Therapy for ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Mutation of MET D1228N as an Acquired Potential Mechanism of Crizotinib Resistance in NSCLC with MET Y1003H Mutation. Spotlight on Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) from HERTHENA Lung01. Is a Median PFS of 5.5 Months Enough in Light of FLAURA-2 and MARIPOSA? Top 20 EGFR+ NSCLC Clinical and Translational Science Papers That Shaped the 20 Years Since the Discovery of Activating EGFR Mutations in NSCLC. An Editor-in-Chief Expert Panel Consensus Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1