Short-Term Outcomes of Extended Pancreatectomy: A Single-Surgeon Experience.

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal Tumors Pub Date : 2018-02-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-30 DOI:10.1159/000484523
Tze-Yi Low, Ye-Xin Koh, Jin-Yao Teo, Brian K P Goh
{"title":"Short-Term Outcomes of Extended Pancreatectomy: A Single-Surgeon Experience.","authors":"Tze-Yi Low,&nbsp;Ye-Xin Koh,&nbsp;Jin-Yao Teo,&nbsp;Brian K P Goh","doi":"10.1159/000484523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery recently published a consensus statement on the definition of extended pancreatectomy (EP). We aimed to determine the safety profile and short-term outcomes of EP compared to standard pancreatectomy (SP). To mitigate surgeon bias, only pancreatectomies performed by a single surgeon were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety consecutive patients who underwent pancreatectomy by a single surgeon over a period of 5 years and who met our study criteria were classified into an SP or an EP group. Sixty-two patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), including total pancreatectomy, and 28 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 25 patients who underwent EP had significantly increased operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, and postoperative stay compared to the 65 patients who underwent SP. There was 1 (1.1%) 30-day mortality and 4 (4.4%) in-hospital mortalities. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar between both groups. Subgroup analysis of the patients who underwent PD demonstrated that the EP group (<i>n</i> = 22) had significantly increased operation time and postoperative ICU transfers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although patients who underwent EP experienced significantly increased operative time, blood loss, and postoperative stay, they did not experience significantly higher postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to patients who underwent SP.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"4 3-4","pages":"72-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000484523","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000484523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background/aims: The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery recently published a consensus statement on the definition of extended pancreatectomy (EP). We aimed to determine the safety profile and short-term outcomes of EP compared to standard pancreatectomy (SP). To mitigate surgeon bias, only pancreatectomies performed by a single surgeon were included.

Methods: Ninety consecutive patients who underwent pancreatectomy by a single surgeon over a period of 5 years and who met our study criteria were classified into an SP or an EP group. Sixty-two patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), including total pancreatectomy, and 28 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy.

Results: The 25 patients who underwent EP had significantly increased operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, and postoperative stay compared to the 65 patients who underwent SP. There was 1 (1.1%) 30-day mortality and 4 (4.4%) in-hospital mortalities. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar between both groups. Subgroup analysis of the patients who underwent PD demonstrated that the EP group (n = 22) had significantly increased operation time and postoperative ICU transfers.

Conclusion: Although patients who underwent EP experienced significantly increased operative time, blood loss, and postoperative stay, they did not experience significantly higher postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to patients who underwent SP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延长胰腺切除术的短期疗效:单外科医生的经验。
背景/目的:国际胰腺外科研究小组最近发表了一份关于扩大胰腺切除术(EP)定义的共识声明。我们的目的是确定EP与标准胰腺切除术(SP)相比的安全性和短期结果。为了减轻外科医生的偏见,仅包括由单一外科医生进行的胰腺切除术。方法:在5年的时间里,连续90例由同一位外科医生行胰腺切除术,符合我们的研究标准的患者被分为SP组或EP组。62例患者行胰十二指肠切除术(PD),包括全胰切除术,28例行远端胰切除术。结果:与65例SP患者相比,25例EP患者的手术时间、估计出血量、术后重症监护病房(ICU)转移和术后住院时间显著增加。30天死亡率为1例(1.1%),住院死亡率为4例(4.4%)。两组术后发病率和死亡率相似。对PD患者的亚组分析显示,EP组(n = 22)的手术时间和术后ICU转院次数明显增加。结论:虽然EP患者的手术时间、出血量和术后住院时间明显增加,但与SP患者相比,EP患者的术后发病率和死亡率并没有明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal Tumors
Gastrointestinal Tumors GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Novel Urinary Biomarkers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in a Predominantly African American Population: A Case-Control Study. Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers. Association between Serum Zinc Levels and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Patients with Gastric Cancer. Mixed Neuroendocrine and Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm of Pancreas: What Do We Know, What Have We Learnt? Mast Cell Sarcoma of Small Intestine, Early Diagnosis, and Good Prognosis: An Extremely Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1