{"title":"Vitamin D Assays.","authors":"Daniel D Bikle","doi":"10.1159/000486062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of requests for vitamin D metabolite measurements has increased dramatically over the past decade leading commercial laboratories to develop rapid high throughput assays. The measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) and to a lesser extent 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25[OH]2D) dominates these requests, but requests for multiple metabolite measurements in the same sample are also increasing. The most commonly used methods include immunoassays and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, but with improvements in technology, especially in LC-MS, this method is gaining ascendance due to its greater precision and flexibility. The use of standards from the National Institutes of Standards and Technology has substantially reduced the variability from laboratory to laboratory, thereby improving the reliability of these measurements. Although the current demand is for measurement of total vitamin D metabolite levels, these metabolites circulate in blood tightly bound to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and albumin with less than 1% free. The free concentration may be a more accurate indicator of vitamin D status especially in individuals with DBP levels that deviate from the normal population. Thus, methods to measure the free concentration at least of 25(OH)D are becoming available and may supplement if not replace measurements of total levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":50428,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Hormone Research","volume":"50 ","pages":"14-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000486062","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Hormone Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000486062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
The number of requests for vitamin D metabolite measurements has increased dramatically over the past decade leading commercial laboratories to develop rapid high throughput assays. The measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) and to a lesser extent 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25[OH]2D) dominates these requests, but requests for multiple metabolite measurements in the same sample are also increasing. The most commonly used methods include immunoassays and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, but with improvements in technology, especially in LC-MS, this method is gaining ascendance due to its greater precision and flexibility. The use of standards from the National Institutes of Standards and Technology has substantially reduced the variability from laboratory to laboratory, thereby improving the reliability of these measurements. Although the current demand is for measurement of total vitamin D metabolite levels, these metabolites circulate in blood tightly bound to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and albumin with less than 1% free. The free concentration may be a more accurate indicator of vitamin D status especially in individuals with DBP levels that deviate from the normal population. Thus, methods to measure the free concentration at least of 25(OH)D are becoming available and may supplement if not replace measurements of total levels.
期刊介绍:
A series of integrated overviews on cutting-edge topics
New sophisticated technologies and methodological approaches in diagnostics and therapeutics have led to significant improvements in identifying and characterizing an increasing number of medical conditions, which is particularly true for all aspects of endocrine and metabolic dysfunctions. Novel insights in endocrine physiology and pathophysiology allow for new perspectives in clinical management and thus lead to the development of molecular, personalized treatments. In view of this, the active interplay between basic scientists and clinicians has become fundamental, both to provide patients with the most appropriate care and to advance future research.