Evaluation of Pharmacist-Initiated Discharge Medication Reconciliation and Patient Counseling Procedures.

Sebastian Choi, Jaime Babiak
{"title":"Evaluation of Pharmacist-Initiated Discharge Medication Reconciliation and Patient Counseling Procedures.","authors":"Sebastian Choi,&nbsp;Jaime Babiak","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2018.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate a recently implemented procedure of discharge medication reconciliation and patient counseling completed by pharmacists at a nursing facility.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This is a 138-bed nursing facility that houses long-term care residents as well as patients for subacute rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Practice description: </strong>Discharge process involves the medical team (geriatrician, medical resident, medical students), social workers, and nurse coordinators.</p><p><strong>Practice innovation: </strong>Pharmacists are incorporated in the discharge process by completing medication reconciliation, patient counseling, and telephone follow-up, to improve patient understanding and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>Medication discrepancies identified by pharmacists via medication reconciliation, number of patients who were counseled by pharmacist, and number of patients encountered for telephone follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients were discharged during the study period. A total of 200 discrepancies were identified after discharge medication reconciliation by the pharmacist. On average, we found that there were 4 discrepancies per patient (range 0 to 16). Most of the discrepancies that were found were medication additions and omissions. Forty-five patients (83.3%) agreed to counseling and were then counseled by a pharmacist. Patients were often not counseled because of last-minute discharge, and no encounter was made.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Involving pharmacists in patient transitions of care may be beneficial as previous studies have demonstrated; however, additional studies in a nursing facility setting are needed to validate these benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":45985,"journal":{"name":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4140/TCP.n.2018.222","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2018.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a recently implemented procedure of discharge medication reconciliation and patient counseling completed by pharmacists at a nursing facility.

Setting: This is a 138-bed nursing facility that houses long-term care residents as well as patients for subacute rehabilitation.

Practice description: Discharge process involves the medical team (geriatrician, medical resident, medical students), social workers, and nurse coordinators.

Practice innovation: Pharmacists are incorporated in the discharge process by completing medication reconciliation, patient counseling, and telephone follow-up, to improve patient understanding and satisfaction.

Main outcome measurements: Medication discrepancies identified by pharmacists via medication reconciliation, number of patients who were counseled by pharmacist, and number of patients encountered for telephone follow-up.

Results: Fifty-four patients were discharged during the study period. A total of 200 discrepancies were identified after discharge medication reconciliation by the pharmacist. On average, we found that there were 4 discrepancies per patient (range 0 to 16). Most of the discrepancies that were found were medication additions and omissions. Forty-five patients (83.3%) agreed to counseling and were then counseled by a pharmacist. Patients were often not counseled because of last-minute discharge, and no encounter was made.

Conclusion: Involving pharmacists in patient transitions of care may be beneficial as previous studies have demonstrated; however, additional studies in a nursing facility setting are needed to validate these benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估药剂师发起的出院药物和解和病人咨询程序。
目的:评价某护理机构最近实施的由药师完成的出院药物和解和患者咨询程序。环境:这是一个有138张床位的护理机构,容纳长期护理居民和亚急性康复患者。实践描述:出院过程涉及医疗团队(老年病专家、住院医生、医学生)、社会工作者和护士协调员。实践创新:将药师纳入出院流程,完成药物调解、患者咨询、电话随访等工作,提高患者的理解和满意度。主要结果测量:药师通过药物调解确定的用药差异、药师咨询的患者人数、电话随访的患者人数。结果:54例患者在研究期间出院。出院后由药师进行药物核对,共发现200个差异。平均而言,我们发现每个患者有4个差异(范围0到16)。发现的大多数差异是药物的增加和遗漏。45名患者(83.3%)同意咨询,然后由药剂师进行咨询。病人往往没有咨询,因为最后一刻出院,没有遇到。结论:正如之前的研究所证明的那样,让药剂师参与患者的护理过渡可能是有益的;然而,需要在护理机构环境中进行额外的研究来验证这些益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Vision ... The Society"s long-term desire, aspiration, and core purpose. The vision of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists is optimal medication management and improved health outcomes for all older persons. Mission ... The Society"s strategic position, focus, and reason for being. The American Society of Consultant Pharmacists empowers pharmacists to enhance quality of care for all older persons through the appropriate use of medication and the promotion of healthy aging.
期刊最新文献
Bylines. Identifying Cognitive Impairment in an Older Adult Using Two Different Screening Tools. Statins: The Burglar of Memory? Clinical Pharmacist Intervention to Engage Older Adults in Reducing Use of Alprazolam. Digging Deeper Into the Patient-Driven Payment Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1