What’s new in... Capnography Monitoring for Dental Conscious Sedation: A Clinical Review.

SAAD digest Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Paul J Brady, Martina Hayes, Christine E McCreary, Ken D O'Halloran, Joseph A Giovannitti
{"title":"What’s new in... Capnography Monitoring for Dental Conscious Sedation: A Clinical Review.","authors":"Paul J Brady,&nbsp;Martina Hayes,&nbsp;Christine E McCreary,&nbsp;Ken D O'Halloran,&nbsp;Joseph A Giovannitti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Capnography monitoring during conscious sedation is not\ncurrently required for dentistry in Britain and Ireland. Other\ncountries have introduced guidelines and standards requiring\ncapnography monitoring for procedural sedation. This review\nhighlights the variability of procedural sedation including the\nsetting, the position on the sedation continuum, and the routine\nuse of supplemental oxygen. Specific research is required for\nconscious sedation in a dental setting to support standards and\nguidelines with regard to capnography monitoring.\nThe Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties\nemphasise that each specialty must produce its own guidance for\nthe use of sedative techniques.1 Clinical practice guidelines for the\nmonitoring and safe practice of sedation vary by specialty and\ninstitution. Standards are generally set from the best available\nevidence based research. There is a growing body of literature that\nrecognises the potential additional value of capnography (ETCO2)\nmonitoring during procedural sedation in different settings and for\ndifferent sedation techniques.2-5 In these studies, capnography\nreduced the incidence of hypoxaemia during procedural sedation.\nA meta-analysis published by Waugh et al. (2010) concluded that\nend-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring is an important addition in\ndetecting respiratory depression during procedural sedation.6 A\nmore recent systematic review by Conway et al. (2016) concluded\nthat patients monitored with capnography in addition to standard\nmonitoring had a reduced risk of hypoxaemia compared to those\nwith only standard monitoring.7 However, it has to be noted that\nboth the Waugh and Conway reviews contained substantial\nstatistical heterogenicity which is likely to affect the quality of the\nevidence.\nAs research evidence for capnography monitoring from the\nmedical settings studied became available, new standards for\ncapnography monitoring were introduced in several countries\n(Table 1).</p>","PeriodicalId":21571,"journal":{"name":"SAAD digest","volume":"33 ","pages":"3-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAAD digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capnography monitoring during conscious sedation is not currently required for dentistry in Britain and Ireland. Other countries have introduced guidelines and standards requiring capnography monitoring for procedural sedation. This review highlights the variability of procedural sedation including the setting, the position on the sedation continuum, and the routine use of supplemental oxygen. Specific research is required for conscious sedation in a dental setting to support standards and guidelines with regard to capnography monitoring. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties emphasise that each specialty must produce its own guidance for the use of sedative techniques.1 Clinical practice guidelines for the monitoring and safe practice of sedation vary by specialty and institution. Standards are generally set from the best available evidence based research. There is a growing body of literature that recognises the potential additional value of capnography (ETCO2) monitoring during procedural sedation in different settings and for different sedation techniques.2-5 In these studies, capnography reduced the incidence of hypoxaemia during procedural sedation. A meta-analysis published by Waugh et al. (2010) concluded that end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring is an important addition in detecting respiratory depression during procedural sedation.6 A more recent systematic review by Conway et al. (2016) concluded that patients monitored with capnography in addition to standard monitoring had a reduced risk of hypoxaemia compared to those with only standard monitoring.7 However, it has to be noted that both the Waugh and Conway reviews contained substantial statistical heterogenicity which is likely to affect the quality of the evidence. As research evidence for capnography monitoring from the medical settings studied became available, new standards for capnography monitoring were introduced in several countries (Table 1).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有什么新鲜事吗?血管造影监测牙齿清醒镇静:临床回顾。
在英国和爱尔兰,目前牙科不需要在清醒镇静期间进行二氧化碳监测。其他国家已经出台了指导方针和标准,要求对程序性镇静进行造影监测。这篇综述强调了程序性镇静的可变性,包括设置、镇静连续体上的位置和常规补充氧的使用。需要对牙科环境中的有意识镇静进行具体的研究,以支持有关血管造影监测的标准和指南。英国皇家医学院及其院系强调,每个专业都必须制定自己的镇静技术使用指南镇静监测和安全操作的临床实践指南因专业和机构而异。标准通常是根据现有的最佳证据研究制定的。越来越多的文献认识到,在不同环境和不同镇静技术下,在程序性镇静过程中,血管造影(ETCO2)监测的潜在附加价值。2-5在这些研究中,血糖记录降低了手术镇静期间低氧血症的发生率。Waugh等人(2010)发表的一项荟萃分析得出结论,潮汐末二氧化碳监测是在手术镇静期间检测呼吸抑制的重要补充Conway等人(2016)最近的一项系统综述得出结论,与仅进行标准监测的患者相比,在进行标准监测的同时进行血液造影监测的患者发生低氧血症的风险降低然而,必须指出的是,Waugh和Conway的综述都包含大量的统计异质性,这可能会影响证据的质量。随着医学环境中对血糖监测的研究证据的出现,一些国家引入了血糖监测的新标准(表1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hazards. Bispectral Index Guided Target Controlled Midazolam Sedation: a new advanced technique for dental procedures. Anaesthesia and Sedation for the Autistic Patient. The Clinical Management of the Gagging Patient. Behaviour Management of Children Presenting in the Emergency Department with OMFS Problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1