Clinical and Imaging Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy in Patients with Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke and Mild Clinical Symptoms.

Q1 Medicine Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2018-02-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-23 DOI:10.1159/000481205
Meredith T Bowen, Leticia C Rebello, Mehdi Bouslama, Diogo C Haussen, Jonathan A Grossberg, Nicolas A Bianchi, Samir Belagaje, Aaron Anderson, Michael R Frankel, Raul G Nogueira
{"title":"Clinical and Imaging Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy in Patients with Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke and Mild Clinical Symptoms.","authors":"Meredith T Bowen,&nbsp;Leticia C Rebello,&nbsp;Mehdi Bouslama,&nbsp;Diogo C Haussen,&nbsp;Jonathan A Grossberg,&nbsp;Nicolas A Bianchi,&nbsp;Samir Belagaje,&nbsp;Aaron Anderson,&nbsp;Michael R Frankel,&nbsp;Raul G Nogueira","doi":"10.1159/000481205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The minimal stroke severity justifying endovascular intervention remains elusive. However, a significant proportion of patients presenting with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) and mild symptoms go untreated and face poor outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with LVOS and low symptom scores (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≤8) undergoing endovascular therapy (ET).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected ET database between September 2010 and March 2016. Endovascularly treated patients with LVOS and a baseline NIHSS score ≤8 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural details, and outcome parameters were collected. Efficacy outcomes were the rate of good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) and of successful reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score 2b-3). Safety was assessed by the rate of parenchymal hematoma (parenchymal hematoma type 1 [PH-1] and parenchymal hematoma type 2 [PH-2]) and 90-day mortality. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of good clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 935 patients were considered; 72 patients with an NIHSS score ≤8 were included. Median [IQR] age was 61.5 years [56.2-73.0]; 39 patients (54%) were men. Mean (SD) baseline NIHSS score, computed tomography perfusion core volume, and ASPECTS were 6.3 (1.5), 7.5 mL (16.1), and 8.5 (1.3), respectively. Twenty-eight patients (39%) received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Occlusions locations were as follows: 29 (40%) proximal MCA-M1, 20 (28%) MCA-M2, 6 (8%) ICA terminus, and 9 (13%) vertebrobasilar. Tandem occlusion was documented in 7 patients (10%). Sixty-seven patients (93%) achieved successful reperfusion (mTICI score 2b-3); 52 (72%) had good 90-day outcomes. Mean final infarct volume was 32.2 ± 59.9 mL. Parenchymal hematoma occurred in 4 patients (6%). Ninety-day mortality was 10% (<i>n</i> = 7). Logistic regression showed that only successful reperfusion (OR 27.7, 95% CI 1.1-655.5, <i>p</i> = 0.04) was an independent predictor of good outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that ET is safe and feasible for LVOS patients presenting with mild clinical syndromes. Future controlled studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000481205","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000481205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: The minimal stroke severity justifying endovascular intervention remains elusive. However, a significant proportion of patients presenting with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) and mild symptoms go untreated and face poor outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with LVOS and low symptom scores (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≤8) undergoing endovascular therapy (ET).

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected ET database between September 2010 and March 2016. Endovascularly treated patients with LVOS and a baseline NIHSS score ≤8 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural details, and outcome parameters were collected. Efficacy outcomes were the rate of good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) and of successful reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score 2b-3). Safety was assessed by the rate of parenchymal hematoma (parenchymal hematoma type 1 [PH-1] and parenchymal hematoma type 2 [PH-2]) and 90-day mortality. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of good clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 935 patients were considered; 72 patients with an NIHSS score ≤8 were included. Median [IQR] age was 61.5 years [56.2-73.0]; 39 patients (54%) were men. Mean (SD) baseline NIHSS score, computed tomography perfusion core volume, and ASPECTS were 6.3 (1.5), 7.5 mL (16.1), and 8.5 (1.3), respectively. Twenty-eight patients (39%) received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Occlusions locations were as follows: 29 (40%) proximal MCA-M1, 20 (28%) MCA-M2, 6 (8%) ICA terminus, and 9 (13%) vertebrobasilar. Tandem occlusion was documented in 7 patients (10%). Sixty-seven patients (93%) achieved successful reperfusion (mTICI score 2b-3); 52 (72%) had good 90-day outcomes. Mean final infarct volume was 32.2 ± 59.9 mL. Parenchymal hematoma occurred in 4 patients (6%). Ninety-day mortality was 10% (n = 7). Logistic regression showed that only successful reperfusion (OR 27.7, 95% CI 1.1-655.5, p = 0.04) was an independent predictor of good outcomes.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that ET is safe and feasible for LVOS patients presenting with mild clinical syndromes. Future controlled studies are warranted.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性大血管闭塞性卒中伴轻度临床症状患者血管内治疗的临床与影像学结果
背景:最小的卒中严重程度证明血管内干预仍然是难以捉摸的。然而,相当一部分表现为大血管闭塞性卒中(LVOS)且症状轻微的患者未经治疗,面临不良预后。我们的目的是评估LVOS和低症状评分(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]评分≤8)患者接受血管内治疗(ET)的临床结果。方法:我们对2010年9月至2016年3月期间前瞻性收集的ET数据库进行回顾性分析。纳入基线NIHSS评分≤8的LVOS血管内治疗患者。收集基线患者特征、手术细节和结果参数。疗效指标为良好转归率(90天改良Rankin量表评分0-2分)和再灌注成功率(改良脑梗死治疗[mTICI]评分2b-3分)。通过实质血肿(1型实质血肿[PH-1]和2型实质血肿[PH-2])发生率和90天死亡率来评估安全性。使用逻辑回归来确定良好临床结果的预测因素。结果:共纳入935例患者;纳入72例NIHSS评分≤8分的患者。中位[IQR]年龄为61.5岁[56.2-73.0];男性39例(54%)。平均(SD)基线NIHSS评分、计算机断层扫描灌注核容积和ASPECTS分别为6.3(1.5)、7.5 mL(16.1)和8.5 mL(1.3)。28例患者(39%)静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂。闭塞部位如下:29例(40%)近端MCA-M1, 20例(28%)MCA-M2, 6例(8%)ICA末梢,9例(13%)椎基底动脉。串联闭塞7例(10%)。67例(93%)患者再灌注成功(mTICI评分2b-3);52例(72%)90天预后良好。平均最终梗死体积为32.2±59.9 mL,发生实质血肿4例(6%)。90天死亡率为10% (n = 7)。Logistic回归显示,只有再灌注成功(OR 27.7, 95% CI 1.1-655.5, p = 0.04)是预后良好的独立预测因子。结论:我们的研究结果表明,对于表现为轻度临床症状的LVOS患者,ET是安全可行的。未来的对照研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recanalization of Tandem Vertebrobasilar Occlusions with Contralateral Vertebral Occlusion or Hypoplasia via either Direct Passage or the SHERPA Technique. Does the Addition of Non-Approved Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for rtPA Impact Treatment Rates? Findings in Australia, the UK, and the USA. In vitro Remote Aspiration Embolectomy for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Endovascular Reperfusion for Acute Isolated Cervical Carotid Occlusions: The Concept of "Hemodynamic Thrombectomy". An Appraisal of the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1