Pharmacological differences and clinical implications of various botulinum toxin preparations: a critical appraisal.

Q2 Medicine Functional neurology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.11138/fneur/2018.33.1.007
A Ferrari, M Manca, V Tugnoli, L Alberto
{"title":"Pharmacological differences and clinical implications of various botulinum toxin preparations: a critical appraisal.","authors":"A Ferrari,&nbsp;M Manca,&nbsp;V Tugnoli,&nbsp;L Alberto","doi":"10.11138/fneur/2018.33.1.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three different type A botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTAs) - onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA) - are currently marketed in Europe to treat several conditions. Differences between BoNTA preparations, which depend on their specific biotypes and manufacturing processes, lead to clinically relevant pharmacotherapeutic dissimilarities. All three available products are separately recognized and reviewed in American Academy of Neurology guidelines. The neurotoxin load/100U is likewise different among the different BoNTAs, with the result that the specific potency of the 150kD BoNTA neurotoxin is calculated as 137 units/ng for onabotulinumtoxinA, 154 units/ng for abobotulinumtoxinA, and 227 units/ng for incobotulinumtoxinA. It is important for clinicians to have all three BoNTAs available in order to choose the most suitable preparation for the specific indication in the single patient. Commercially available BoNTAs must be recognized as different from one another, and therefore as non-interchangeable. The essential experience of the clinician is of the utmost importance in choosing the most appropriate treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12560,"journal":{"name":"Functional neurology","volume":"33 1","pages":"7-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/fneur/2018.33.1.007","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/fneur/2018.33.1.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Three different type A botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTAs) - onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA) - are currently marketed in Europe to treat several conditions. Differences between BoNTA preparations, which depend on their specific biotypes and manufacturing processes, lead to clinically relevant pharmacotherapeutic dissimilarities. All three available products are separately recognized and reviewed in American Academy of Neurology guidelines. The neurotoxin load/100U is likewise different among the different BoNTAs, with the result that the specific potency of the 150kD BoNTA neurotoxin is calculated as 137 units/ng for onabotulinumtoxinA, 154 units/ng for abobotulinumtoxinA, and 227 units/ng for incobotulinumtoxinA. It is important for clinicians to have all three BoNTAs available in order to choose the most suitable preparation for the specific indication in the single patient. Commercially available BoNTAs must be recognized as different from one another, and therefore as non-interchangeable. The essential experience of the clinician is of the utmost importance in choosing the most appropriate treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种肉毒杆菌毒素制剂的药理学差异和临床意义:一个关键的评价。
三种不同的A型肉毒杆菌神经毒素(BoNTAs)——肉毒杆菌毒素A、肉毒杆菌毒素A和肉毒杆菌毒素A)目前在欧洲上市,用于治疗几种疾病。BoNTA制剂之间的差异取决于其特定的生物型和制造工艺,导致临床相关的药物治疗差异。这三种可用的产品分别在美国神经病学学会指南中得到认可和审查。不同BoNTA的神经毒素负荷/100U同样不同,结果计算出150kD BoNTA神经毒素的比效为肉毒杆菌毒素ina的137单位/ng,肉毒杆菌毒素ina的154单位/ng,肉毒杆菌毒素ina的227单位/ng。对于临床医生来说,重要的是拥有所有三种bonta,以便为单个患者的特定适应症选择最合适的制剂。商业上可用的bonta必须被认为是彼此不同的,因此是不可互换的。在选择最合适的治疗方法时,临床医生的基本经验至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Functional neurology
Functional neurology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Barthel Index in patients with Parkinson's disease: a reliability and validity study. Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on upper limb activity according to a bi-dimensional kinematic analysis in progressive multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized single-blind pilot study. Does a single bout of exercise impacts BDNF, oxidative stress and epigenetic markers in spinal cord injury patients? Acute ischemic stroke management in Lebanon: obstacles and solutions. Neurophysiological changes after cognitive-motor tasks in Parkinson's disease patients with deep brain stimulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1