Comparison of three formulas to estimate 24-hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion in patients hospitalized in a hypertension unit

Piotr Jędrusik MD, PhD, Bartosz Symonides MD, PhD, Zbigniew Gaciong MD, PhD
{"title":"Comparison of three formulas to estimate 24-hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion in patients hospitalized in a hypertension unit","authors":"Piotr Jędrusik MD, PhD,&nbsp;Bartosz Symonides MD, PhD,&nbsp;Zbigniew Gaciong MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jash.2018.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Measurements of 24-hour urinary sodium (24hrUNa) and potassium (24hrUK) excretion are useful in hypertensives but 24-hour urine collection may be difficult or unreliable. We compared three formulas (Tanaka, Kawasaki, Pan American Health Organization [PAHO]) proposed to estimate 24hrUNa and 24hrUK based on spot urine measurements. We studied 382 patients admitted to a hypertension unit. Sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels were measured using standard laboratory methods in a morning urine sample, followed by 24-hour urinary collection. Agreement between estimated and measured 24hrUNa and 24hrUK was evaluated using the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Measured 24hrUNa was 158 ± 75 mmol/d and 24hrUK was 54 ± 24 mmol/d. The correlation coefficient was r = 0.53 for estimated versus measured 24hrUNa, r = 0.69–0.73 for estimated versus measured 24hrUK (all </span><em>P</em> &lt; .001). The mean bias for 24hrUNa was significantly smaller for Tanaka (10.5 mmol/d) and PAHO (11.5 mmol/d) compared with Kawasaki formula (−29.9 mmol/d). The mean bias for 24hrUK was significantly smaller for Kawasaki (7.3 mmol/d) and PAHO (8.3 mmol/d) compared with Tanaka formula (16.5 mmol/d). Using a single morning urine sample, we found the PAHO formula to be the best for predicting mean 24hrUK and 24hrUNa in hospitalized hypertensive patients. However, precision and accuracy of all the evaluated formulas was inadequate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jash.2018.03.010","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933171118300780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Measurements of 24-hour urinary sodium (24hrUNa) and potassium (24hrUK) excretion are useful in hypertensives but 24-hour urine collection may be difficult or unreliable. We compared three formulas (Tanaka, Kawasaki, Pan American Health Organization [PAHO]) proposed to estimate 24hrUNa and 24hrUK based on spot urine measurements. We studied 382 patients admitted to a hypertension unit. Sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels were measured using standard laboratory methods in a morning urine sample, followed by 24-hour urinary collection. Agreement between estimated and measured 24hrUNa and 24hrUK was evaluated using the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Measured 24hrUNa was 158 ± 75 mmol/d and 24hrUK was 54 ± 24 mmol/d. The correlation coefficient was r = 0.53 for estimated versus measured 24hrUNa, r = 0.69–0.73 for estimated versus measured 24hrUK (all P < .001). The mean bias for 24hrUNa was significantly smaller for Tanaka (10.5 mmol/d) and PAHO (11.5 mmol/d) compared with Kawasaki formula (−29.9 mmol/d). The mean bias for 24hrUK was significantly smaller for Kawasaki (7.3 mmol/d) and PAHO (8.3 mmol/d) compared with Tanaka formula (16.5 mmol/d). Using a single morning urine sample, we found the PAHO formula to be the best for predicting mean 24hrUK and 24hrUNa in hospitalized hypertensive patients. However, precision and accuracy of all the evaluated formulas was inadequate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高血压住院病人24小时尿钠钾排泄量的三种计算方法的比较
测量24小时尿钠(24hrUNa)和钾(24hrUK)排泄对高血压患者有用,但24小时尿液收集可能困难或不可靠。我们比较了Tanaka、Kawasaki和泛美卫生组织[PAHO]提出的基于尿样测量估计24hrUNa和24hrUK的三个公式。我们研究了382名入住高血压病房的患者。钠、钾和肌酐水平采用标准的实验室方法在晨尿样本中测量,随后24小时收集尿液。使用Pearson相关和Bland-Altman图评估估计和测量的24hrUNa和24hrUK之间的一致性。测定24hrUNa为158±75 mmol/d, 24hrUK为54±24 mmol/d。估计24hrua与测量24hrua的相关系数r = 0.53,估计24hrUK与测量24hrUK的相关系数r = 0.69-0.73(均P <措施)。与川崎公式(- 29.9 mmol/d)相比,Tanaka公式(10.5 mmol/d)和PAHO公式(11.5 mmol/d)的24hrUNa平均偏倚显著小于川崎公式(- 29.9 mmol/d)。与田中公式(16.5 mmol/d)相比,川崎公式(7.3 mmol/d)和PAHO公式(8.3 mmol/d)的24hrUK平均偏倚显著小于田中公式(7.3 mmol/d)。使用单个晨尿样本,我们发现PAHO公式最能预测住院高血压患者的平均24hrUK和24hrUNa。然而,所有评价公式的精密度和准确性都不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. The Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (JASH) publishes peer-reviewed articles on the topics of basic, applied and translational research on blood pressure, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders and factors; as well as clinical research and clinical trials in hypertension. Original research studies, reviews, hypotheses, editorial commentary and special reports spanning the spectrum of human and experimental animal and tissue research will be considered. All research studies must have been conducted following animal welfare guidelines. Studies involving human subjects or tissues must have received approval of the appropriate institutional committee charged with oversight of human studies and informed consent must be obtained.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Instructions for Authors Clinical impact of dipping and nocturnal blood pressure patterns in newly diagnosed, never-treated patients with essential hypertension Association between resting heart rate and hypertension in Chinese with different waist-to-height ratio: a population-based cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1