UPFRONT DPD DEFICIENCY DETECTION TO SECURE 5-FU ADMINISTRATION: PART 2- APPLICATION TO HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER PATIENTS.

Manon Launay, Joseph Ciccolini, Claire Fournel, Carmelo Blanquicett, Charlotte Dupuis, Nicolas Fakhry, Florence Duffaud, Sébastien Salas, Bruno Lacarelle
{"title":"UPFRONT DPD DEFICIENCY DETECTION TO SECURE 5-FU ADMINISTRATION: PART 2- APPLICATION TO HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER PATIENTS.","authors":"Manon Launay,&nbsp;Joseph Ciccolini,&nbsp;Claire Fournel,&nbsp;Carmelo Blanquicett,&nbsp;Charlotte Dupuis,&nbsp;Nicolas Fakhry,&nbsp;Florence Duffaud,&nbsp;Sébastien Salas,&nbsp;Bruno Lacarelle","doi":"10.2174/2212697x04666170817123425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upfront screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in patients scheduled for 5-FU should help reduce the risk of toxicities by preventive adaptive dosing. Our group has developed a simple functional testing categorizing patients upon their DPD status, i.e. extensive metabolizer (EM) or poor metabolizer (PM) patients, using UH2/U ratio measurement in plasma as a surrogate for DPD activity. 5-FU dosing can then be tailored according to DPD deficiency status.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We present here an observational study of this strategy implemented in routine clinical practice when treating head-and-neck cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 218 evaluable adult patients were treated with a 5-FU-regimen, with DPD-based adaptive dosing. Among them, 20 (9%) were identified as PM and received subsequently a 20-50% reduced dosing of 5-FU as compared with EM patients (2102 ±254 mg VS. 2577 ±353mg, p<0.001 ttest). Gender (Female) was associated with higher risk for being PM (p=0.01, Pearson's Chi squared test). Overall, early severe toxicities were seen only in 5% of patients, all being EM with standard dosing. Similarly, overall severe toxicities were observed in 12.8% of patients only, both figures being markedly lower than usually reported with standard 5-FU. Despite the average -20% reduction in 5-FU dosing between PM and EM patients, clinical efficacy was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.2774, chi-square test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that 5-FU-related toxicities can be greatly reduced in routine clinical practice by the upfront detection of DPD deficient patients with simple adaptive dosing strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":91228,"journal":{"name":"Clinical cancer drugs","volume":"4 2","pages":"122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5906055/pdf/nihms955089.pdf","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical cancer drugs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2212697x04666170817123425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background: Upfront screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in patients scheduled for 5-FU should help reduce the risk of toxicities by preventive adaptive dosing. Our group has developed a simple functional testing categorizing patients upon their DPD status, i.e. extensive metabolizer (EM) or poor metabolizer (PM) patients, using UH2/U ratio measurement in plasma as a surrogate for DPD activity. 5-FU dosing can then be tailored according to DPD deficiency status.

Objectives: We present here an observational study of this strategy implemented in routine clinical practice when treating head-and-neck cancer patients.

Results: A total of 218 evaluable adult patients were treated with a 5-FU-regimen, with DPD-based adaptive dosing. Among them, 20 (9%) were identified as PM and received subsequently a 20-50% reduced dosing of 5-FU as compared with EM patients (2102 ±254 mg VS. 2577 ±353mg, p<0.001 ttest). Gender (Female) was associated with higher risk for being PM (p=0.01, Pearson's Chi squared test). Overall, early severe toxicities were seen only in 5% of patients, all being EM with standard dosing. Similarly, overall severe toxicities were observed in 12.8% of patients only, both figures being markedly lower than usually reported with standard 5-FU. Despite the average -20% reduction in 5-FU dosing between PM and EM patients, clinical efficacy was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.2774, chi-square test).

Conclusion: This study shows that 5-FU-related toxicities can be greatly reduced in routine clinical practice by the upfront detection of DPD deficient patients with simple adaptive dosing strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前期DPD缺陷检测确保5-fu给药:第2部分在头颈癌患者中的应用。
背景:在计划接受5-FU治疗的患者中,预先筛查二氢嘧啶脱氢酶(DPD)缺乏症有助于通过预防性适应性给药降低毒性风险。我们的团队开发了一种简单的功能测试,根据患者的DPD状态进行分类,即广泛代谢(EM)或不良代谢(PM)患者,使用血浆中UH2/U比值测量作为DPD活性的替代。5-FU的剂量可以根据DPD缺乏情况进行调整。目的:我们在此提出一项观察性研究,该策略在治疗头颈癌患者的常规临床实践中实施。结果:共有218名可评估的成年患者接受了基于dpd的适应性给药的5- fu方案治疗。其中20例(9%)确诊为PM,随后接受的5-FU剂量较EM患者减少20-50%(2102±254 mg VS. 2577±353mg)。结论:本研究表明,在常规临床实践中,通过对DPD缺陷患者进行早期检测,采用简单的适应性给药策略,可大大降低5-FU相关毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anti-Cancer Activity Evaluation of Naphthalenonic and Chromanonic Spiroisoxazoline Derivatives as Selective COX-2 Inhibitors on HT29 Cell Lines Current Perspective and Treatment Strategies in Targeted Therapy for Colorectal Cancer PAMAM Dendrimers: Revolutionizing the Targeted Cancer Therapy Neurotoxicity of Cisplatin as Monotherapy or Combined Chemotherapy in Cancer Treatment Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) exhibits better binding to the main protease (Mpro) compared to spike protein (S protein) of SARS-CoV-2: An in-silico analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1