Effectiveness of computer-assisted anesthetic delivery system (sta) in dental implant surgery: a prospective study.

ORAL and Implantology Pub Date : 2017-01-21 eCollection Date: 2017-10-01 DOI:10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.381
F R Grassi, B Rapone, F Scarano Catanzaro, M Corsalini, Z Kalemaj
{"title":"Effectiveness of computer-assisted anesthetic delivery system (sta<sup>™</sup>) in dental implant surgery: a prospective study.","authors":"F R Grassi, B Rapone, F Scarano Catanzaro, M Corsalini, Z Kalemaj","doi":"10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This prospective cohort study aimed to investigate effectiveness of Computerized Local Anesthesia (CLA) on oral implantology through estimation of pain and discomfort and total quantity of injected anesthetic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five consecutive patients whose treatment plan included immediate or late dental implants were included in this study. The main inclusion criteria comprised: previous implant intervention under conventional anesthesia (CA) during the past 3 years and no previous treatment of pain relief. All patients reported on a 0-10 scale on previous experience with CA, and new experience with CLA. The same CLA system, namely Single Tooth Anesthesia (STA) was used for all patients with half of the quantity normally used for CA. Data on quantity of anesthetic and reported ratings were collected and described. Potential associations and determinant variables were analysed through correlation analysis and regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 45 patients, 27 received post-extractive implant surgery whereas the rest 18 implant surgery on healed sites. The reported pain from STA (mean 1.6, SD 0.7) showed important difference as compared to CA (7.9, SD 1.2; z=5.873; p<0.0001). The comfort perceived during the STA ranged from 7 to 10 (mean 9.5, SD 0.79). A second injection with half of the initial dose was necessary in three cases only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STA system proved to be effective during interventions of dental implantology, by markedly reducing patients' pain and discomfort and the total quantity of necessary anesthetic.</p>","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":"10 4","pages":"381-389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892653/pdf/381-389.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This prospective cohort study aimed to investigate effectiveness of Computerized Local Anesthesia (CLA) on oral implantology through estimation of pain and discomfort and total quantity of injected anesthetic.

Methods: Forty-five consecutive patients whose treatment plan included immediate or late dental implants were included in this study. The main inclusion criteria comprised: previous implant intervention under conventional anesthesia (CA) during the past 3 years and no previous treatment of pain relief. All patients reported on a 0-10 scale on previous experience with CA, and new experience with CLA. The same CLA system, namely Single Tooth Anesthesia (STA) was used for all patients with half of the quantity normally used for CA. Data on quantity of anesthetic and reported ratings were collected and described. Potential associations and determinant variables were analysed through correlation analysis and regression models.

Results: Out of 45 patients, 27 received post-extractive implant surgery whereas the rest 18 implant surgery on healed sites. The reported pain from STA (mean 1.6, SD 0.7) showed important difference as compared to CA (7.9, SD 1.2; z=5.873; p<0.0001). The comfort perceived during the STA ranged from 7 to 10 (mean 9.5, SD 0.79). A second injection with half of the initial dose was necessary in three cases only.

Conclusions: STA system proved to be effective during interventions of dental implantology, by markedly reducing patients' pain and discomfort and the total quantity of necessary anesthetic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机辅助麻醉给药系统 (sta™) 在种植牙手术中的效果:一项前瞻性研究。
目的:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在通过估计疼痛和不适感以及注射麻醉剂的总量,研究计算机化局部麻醉(CLA)对口腔种植的有效性:这项前瞻性队列研究旨在通过估计疼痛和不适感以及注射麻醉剂的总量,研究计算机化局部麻醉(CLA)对口腔种植的有效性:本研究连续纳入了 45 名治疗计划包括即刻或晚期种植牙的患者。主要纳入标准包括:过去 3 年内曾在常规麻醉(CA)下进行过种植干预,且之前未进行过止痛治疗。所有患者均以 0-10 分的标准汇报了之前使用 CA 的经验和使用 CLA 的新经验。所有患者均使用相同的 CLA 系统,即单牙麻醉 (STA),麻醉剂量为 CA 通常使用量的一半。收集并描述了有关麻醉剂量和报告评分的数据。通过相关分析和回归模型分析了潜在的关联和决定性变量:在 45 位患者中,27 位接受了拔牙后种植手术,其余 18 位接受了愈合部位的种植手术。与 CA(7.9,SD 1.2;z=5.873;pConclusions)相比,STA(平均 1.6,SD 0.7)的疼痛报告显示出显著差异:事实证明,STA 系统在牙科种植干预过程中非常有效,能明显减轻患者的疼痛和不适感,并减少所需的麻醉剂总量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ORAL and Implantology
ORAL and Implantology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment of colonization of legionella spp. in dental unit waterlines. Clinical protocol with digital cad/cam chairside workflow for the rehabilitation of severely worn dentition patients. Correlations between dental malocclusions, ocular motility, and convergence disorders: a cross-sectional study in growing subjects. Obstructive site localization in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: a comparison between otolaryngologic data and cephalometric values. Prosthetic management of patients with oro-maxillo-facial defects: a long-term follow-up retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1