Prospective evaluation of cardiac ultrasound performance by general internal medicine physicians during a 6-month faculty development curriculum.

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Critical Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2018-04-24 DOI:10.1186/s13089-018-0090-7
Christopher J Smith, Abdulrahman Morad, Christopher Balwanz, Elizabeth Lyden, Tabatha Matthias
{"title":"Prospective evaluation of cardiac ultrasound performance by general internal medicine physicians during a 6-month faculty development curriculum.","authors":"Christopher J Smith,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Morad,&nbsp;Christopher Balwanz,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lyden,&nbsp;Tabatha Matthias","doi":"10.1186/s13089-018-0090-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care (POCUS) education is rapidly expanding within medical schools and internal medicine residency programs, but lack of trained faculty is a major barrier. While POCUS training can improve short-term outcomes, knowledge and skills rapidly decay without deliberate practice and feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) by volunteer general internal medicine (GIM) faculty participating in a longitudinal POCUS curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants: Nine GIM clinician-educators participated in a 6-month POCUS curriculum. Faculty performance was compared to three cardiology fellows. Three diagnostic cardiac sonographers (DCS) were also evaluated and served as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Evaluation: </strong>the primary outcome was a FCU efficiency score, calculated by dividing image quality score by exam duration. FCU exams were conducted on three standardized patients after completion of an introductory workshop, at 3 months, and at 6 months. Two blinded cardiologists scored the exams.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>mean efficiency scores were compared using a linear mixed effects model, followed by pairwise comparisons using Tukey's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GIM faculty's FCU efficiency scores were maintained over the 6-month period (2.2, SE 1.0 vs. 3.8, SE 1.0, p = 0.076). Their scores at each session were similar to cardiology fellows (p > 0.69), but inferior to DCSs (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GIM faculty participating in a POCUS curriculum maintained their FCU performance over 6 months with efficiency scores comparable to experienced cardiology fellows.</p>","PeriodicalId":46598,"journal":{"name":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13089-018-0090-7","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-018-0090-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care (POCUS) education is rapidly expanding within medical schools and internal medicine residency programs, but lack of trained faculty is a major barrier. While POCUS training can improve short-term outcomes, knowledge and skills rapidly decay without deliberate practice and feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) by volunteer general internal medicine (GIM) faculty participating in a longitudinal POCUS curriculum.

Methods: Participants: Nine GIM clinician-educators participated in a 6-month POCUS curriculum. Faculty performance was compared to three cardiology fellows. Three diagnostic cardiac sonographers (DCS) were also evaluated and served as the gold standard.

Evaluation: the primary outcome was a FCU efficiency score, calculated by dividing image quality score by exam duration. FCU exams were conducted on three standardized patients after completion of an introductory workshop, at 3 months, and at 6 months. Two blinded cardiologists scored the exams.

Analysis: mean efficiency scores were compared using a linear mixed effects model, followed by pairwise comparisons using Tukey's test.

Results: GIM faculty's FCU efficiency scores were maintained over the 6-month period (2.2, SE 1.0 vs. 3.8, SE 1.0, p = 0.076). Their scores at each session were similar to cardiology fellows (p > 0.69), but inferior to DCSs (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: GIM faculty participating in a POCUS curriculum maintained their FCU performance over 6 months with efficiency scores comparable to experienced cardiology fellows.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在为期6个月的教师发展课程中,普通内科医生对心脏超声表现的前瞻性评估。
背景:即时护理(POCUS)教育在医学院和内科住院医师项目中迅速扩展,但缺乏训练有素的教师是一个主要障碍。虽然POCUS培训可以改善短期效果,但如果没有刻意的练习和反馈,知识和技能会迅速衰退。本研究的目的是评估参与纵向POCUS课程的志愿普通内科(GIM)教师聚焦心脏超声(FCU)的性能。方法:参与者:9名GIM临床教育工作者参加了为期6个月的POCUS课程。教员的表现与三位心脏病学研究员进行了比较。三个诊断心脏超声仪(DCS)也被评估并作为金标准。评价:主要结果是FCU效率评分,由图像质量评分除以检查时间计算。在完成介绍性讲习班后、3个月和6个月对3名标准化患者进行FCU检查。两位盲眼心脏病专家为这些考试打分。分析:平均效率评分采用线性混合效应模型比较,两两比较采用Tukey检验。结果:GIM教师的FCU效率得分在6个月内保持不变(2.2,SE 1.0 vs. 3.8, SE 1.0, p = 0.076)。他们在每次会议上的得分与心脏病学研究员相似(p > 0.69),但低于dcs (p结论:参加POCUS课程的GIM教师在6个月内保持其FCU表现,效率得分与经验丰富的心脏病学研究员相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Ultrasound Journal
Critical Ultrasound Journal RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Point-of-care ultrasound evaluation and puncture simulation of the internal jugular vein by medical students. Interpretation errors in focused cardiac ultrasound by novice pediatric emergency medicine fellow sonologists. Mitral valve velocity time integral and passive leg raise as a measure of volume responsiveness. Diagnostic performance of abdominal point of care ultrasound performed by an emergency physician in acute right iliac fossa pain. Strain analysis for the identification of hypertensive cardiac end-organ damage in the emergency department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1