Małgorzata Bulanda, Wojciech Dyga, Barbara Rusinek, Ewa Czarnobilska
{"title":"[The role of the basophil activation test (BAT) in qualification for specific immunotherapy with inhalant allergens].","authors":"Małgorzata Bulanda, Wojciech Dyga, Barbara Rusinek, Ewa Czarnobilska","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Qualification for specific immunotherapy\n(SIT) according to the\nguidelines of the European Academy\nof Allergy and Clinical Immunology\n(EAACI) includes medical history,\nskin prik tests (SPT) and/or measuring\nthe concentration of sIgE. It\nis necessary to perform additional\ndiagnostic tests in case of discrepancies\nbetween the history and the\nresults of SPT/sIgE or differences\nbetween SPT and sIgE. Basophil\nactivation test (BAT) assesses the\nexpression of activation markers of\nthese cells, eg. CD63 and CD203c after\nstimulation. The aim of our study\nwas to evaluate the usefulness of\nBAT in the qualification for the SIT in\ncomparison to the SPT and sIgE and\nin case of discrepancies between the\nresults of SPT and sIgE.\nThe study included 30 patients\nwith allergic rhinitis (AR) caused\nby allergy to house dust mite (Dermatophagoides\npteronyssinus, Dp)\nor birch pollen qualified for SIT. All\npatients had SPT, sIgE and BAT determination.\nThe group of patients\nwith allergy to birch was a control\ngroup for Dp allergic and vice versa.\nBAT with CD63 antigen expression\nwas performed using a Flow2CAST\ntest. Basophils were stimulated with\nallergen preparation (50, 500, and\n5000 SBU/ml concentrations). BAT\nresults were expressed as a stimulation\nindex (SI). For optimal concentrations\nof 50 and 500 SBU/ml\nparameters comparing BAT to SPT\nand sIgE as the gold standards were\nconsecutively: sensitivity 82-100%\nand 93-100%, specificity 50-94% and\n47-89%, positive predictive value 65-\n94% and 61-87%, negative predictive\nvalue 86-100% and 93-100%. Correlation\nBAT - SPT and BAT - sIgE ranged\nwithin 0.59 to 0.84 and 0.51 to 0.72.\nBAT was helpful in 2 of 30 patients\nwith incompatible results of SPT and\nsIgE.\nOptimal concentrations for basophil\nstimulation are 50 and 500 SBU/\nml. BAT may be useful diagnostic tool in the qualification\nfor the SIT in case of discrepancies between the results\nof SPT and sIgE.</p>","PeriodicalId":21148,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad lekarski","volume":"73 12","pages":"786-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Qualification for specific immunotherapy
(SIT) according to the
guidelines of the European Academy
of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
(EAACI) includes medical history,
skin prik tests (SPT) and/or measuring
the concentration of sIgE. It
is necessary to perform additional
diagnostic tests in case of discrepancies
between the history and the
results of SPT/sIgE or differences
between SPT and sIgE. Basophil
activation test (BAT) assesses the
expression of activation markers of
these cells, eg. CD63 and CD203c after
stimulation. The aim of our study
was to evaluate the usefulness of
BAT in the qualification for the SIT in
comparison to the SPT and sIgE and
in case of discrepancies between the
results of SPT and sIgE.
The study included 30 patients
with allergic rhinitis (AR) caused
by allergy to house dust mite (Dermatophagoides
pteronyssinus, Dp)
or birch pollen qualified for SIT. All
patients had SPT, sIgE and BAT determination.
The group of patients
with allergy to birch was a control
group for Dp allergic and vice versa.
BAT with CD63 antigen expression
was performed using a Flow2CAST
test. Basophils were stimulated with
allergen preparation (50, 500, and
5000 SBU/ml concentrations). BAT
results were expressed as a stimulation
index (SI). For optimal concentrations
of 50 and 500 SBU/ml
parameters comparing BAT to SPT
and sIgE as the gold standards were
consecutively: sensitivity 82-100%
and 93-100%, specificity 50-94% and
47-89%, positive predictive value 65-
94% and 61-87%, negative predictive
value 86-100% and 93-100%. Correlation
BAT - SPT and BAT - sIgE ranged
within 0.59 to 0.84 and 0.51 to 0.72.
BAT was helpful in 2 of 30 patients
with incompatible results of SPT and
sIgE.
Optimal concentrations for basophil
stimulation are 50 and 500 SBU/
ml. BAT may be useful diagnostic tool in the qualification
for the SIT in case of discrepancies between the results
of SPT and sIgE.