[Surgical treatment results of chronic pericardial tamponade].

Przeglad lekarski Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Jarosław Stoliński, Dariusz Plicner, Michał Mędrzyński, Bogusław Kapelak
{"title":"[Surgical treatment results of chronic pericardial tamponade].","authors":"Jarosław Stoliński,&nbsp;Dariusz Plicner,&nbsp;Michał Mędrzyński,&nbsp;Bogusław Kapelak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report the efficacy of\nchronic pericardial effusion treatment\nwith pericardial window creation through\nvideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery\nand pericardial drainage through\na small subxiphoid incision.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective\nanalysis of 31 patients after pericardial\nwindow creation through video-assisted\nthoracoscopic surgery (PW group) and\n77 patients where pericardial drainage\nthrough small subxiphoid incision (PD\ngroup) was performed. Echocardiography\nexaminations were performed to\ndocument pericardial tamponade and\npericardial effusion recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Length of surgery was\n20.5±5.4 minutes in the PD group and\n25.8±6.4 minutes in the PW group,\np<0.001. Amount of fluid evacuated\nfrom pericardium during surgery was\n483±191 ml and 521±253 ml in PD and\nPW groups respectively, p=0.654.\nPostoperative drainage was maintained\nlonger (4.3±1.4 days vs. 3.2±1.0,\np<0.001) and the amount of fluid drained\nafter surgery was higher (497±351\nml vs. 309±231 ml, p=0.031) in the PW\ngroup. The amount of pericardial fluid\nat the end of hospitalization was statistically\nsignificantly higher in the PD\ngroup compared with the PW group\n(8.9±4.9 mm vs. 4.9±3.2 mm, p<0.001).\nHospital stay was 5.7±2.7 days in the\nPD group and 6.1±3.4 in the PW group,\np=0.112. No patient died during\nhospitalization period in either group.\nMortality within 30 days after surgery\nwas 2.6% in the PD and 3.2% in the PW\ngroup (p=0.642). In the PW group there\nwere 4 conversions to right minithoracotomy\ndue to dense pleural adhesions.\nPericardial effusion recurrence\noccurred in 9 patients (12.0%) in the PD\ngroup and none was observed (0.0%) in\nthe PW group (p=0.042) within 30 days\nafter surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pericardial window creation\nthrough video-assisted thoracoscopic\nsurgery should be considered\nthe preferred method over pericardial\ndrainage through a small subxiphoid\nincision for chronic pericardial effusion\nand pericardial tamponade treatment to\nreduce the frequency of pericardial effusion\nreoccurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":21148,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad lekarski","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To report the efficacy of chronic pericardial effusion treatment with pericardial window creation through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and pericardial drainage through a small subxiphoid incision.

Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 31 patients after pericardial window creation through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (PW group) and 77 patients where pericardial drainage through small subxiphoid incision (PD group) was performed. Echocardiography examinations were performed to document pericardial tamponade and pericardial effusion recurrence.

Results: Length of surgery was 20.5±5.4 minutes in the PD group and 25.8±6.4 minutes in the PW group, p<0.001. Amount of fluid evacuated from pericardium during surgery was 483±191 ml and 521±253 ml in PD and PW groups respectively, p=0.654. Postoperative drainage was maintained longer (4.3±1.4 days vs. 3.2±1.0, p<0.001) and the amount of fluid drained after surgery was higher (497±351 ml vs. 309±231 ml, p=0.031) in the PW group. The amount of pericardial fluid at the end of hospitalization was statistically significantly higher in the PD group compared with the PW group (8.9±4.9 mm vs. 4.9±3.2 mm, p<0.001). Hospital stay was 5.7±2.7 days in the PD group and 6.1±3.4 in the PW group, p=0.112. No patient died during hospitalization period in either group. Mortality within 30 days after surgery was 2.6% in the PD and 3.2% in the PW group (p=0.642). In the PW group there were 4 conversions to right minithoracotomy due to dense pleural adhesions. Pericardial effusion recurrence occurred in 9 patients (12.0%) in the PD group and none was observed (0.0%) in the PW group (p=0.042) within 30 days after surgery.

Conclusion: Pericardial window creation through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery should be considered the preferred method over pericardial drainage through a small subxiphoid incision for chronic pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade treatment to reduce the frequency of pericardial effusion reoccurrence.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[慢性心包填塞的外科治疗结果]。
目的:报道电视胸腔镜下开窗术及剑突下小切口心包引流术治疗慢性心包积液的疗效。材料与方法:回顾性分析31例经视频胸腔镜造窗术(PW组)和77例经剑突下小切口心包引流术(pd组)的病例。超声心动图检查证实心包填塞和心包积液复发。结果:PD组手术时间为20.5±5.4 min, PW组手术时间为25.8±6.4 min。结论:在慢性心包积液治疗和心包填塞治疗中,胸腔镜胸腔镜下心包开窗术优于剑下小切口心包引流术,可减少心包积液的再次发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Nitrite poisoning]. [Postpartum depression]. [Pseudomenstruation]. [Chest pain]. [Metformin and changes in blood pressure and heart rate in lean patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)--preliminary study].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1