Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks.

Mareile Kaufmann
{"title":"Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks.","authors":"Mareile Kaufmann","doi":"10.1177/0163443715584101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Departing from the understanding that resilience is a technique of self-organization during emergencies, this article provides a study on the way in which the use of social media influenced and engendered societal resilience practices during the 2011 Norway attacks. It builds on the concepts of governmentality and mediality to discuss how the interplay between social media and its users created new forms of self-initiated and mediated emergency governance. Empirically, it draws on material from 20 in-depth interviews with Norwegians who explained and reflected upon their social media use during the attacks. The article presents an overview of the different functions that social media assumed in the process of dealing with the attacks and discusses these vis-à-vis their related challenges. It draws conclusions about the way in which resilience practices and the resilient subject are influenced by the networked character of 2.0 technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74138,"journal":{"name":"Media, culture, and society","volume":"37 7","pages":"972-987"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0163443715584101","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, culture, and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715584101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Departing from the understanding that resilience is a technique of self-organization during emergencies, this article provides a study on the way in which the use of social media influenced and engendered societal resilience practices during the 2011 Norway attacks. It builds on the concepts of governmentality and mediality to discuss how the interplay between social media and its users created new forms of self-initiated and mediated emergency governance. Empirically, it draws on material from 20 in-depth interviews with Norwegians who explained and reflected upon their social media use during the attacks. The article presents an overview of the different functions that social media assumed in the process of dealing with the attacks and discusses these vis-à-vis their related challenges. It draws conclusions about the way in which resilience practices and the resilient subject are influenced by the networked character of 2.0 technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弹性2.0:2011年挪威袭击期间的社交媒体使用和(自我)护理。
从弹性是紧急情况下的一种自组织技术的理解出发,本文对2011年挪威袭击期间使用社交媒体影响和产生社会弹性实践的方式进行了研究。它以治理和媒介性的概念为基础,讨论社会媒体及其用户之间的相互作用如何创造了自我发起和中介的新形式的应急治理。从经验上看,它借鉴了对20位挪威人的深度采访,这些挪威人解释并反思了他们在袭击期间使用社交媒体的情况。本文概述了社交媒体在处理攻击过程中所承担的不同功能,并讨论了这些功能,参见-à-vis他们的相关挑战。它得出了弹性实践和弹性主体受到2.0技术网络化特征影响的方式的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poland as Gilead. Pop culture fiction and performative protests in the era of the pandemic Between existential mobility and intimacy 5.0: translocal care in pandemic times. Media power in digital Asia: Super apps and megacorps. More than a sex crime: a feminist political economy of the 2014 iCloud hack Beyond platform capitalism: critical perspectives on Facebook markets from Melanesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1