Cost-Effectiveness of Different Strategies for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Pub Date : 2018-10-12 DOI:10.1093/ibd/izy114
Bin Wu, Zhenhua Wang, Qiang Zhang
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Different Strategies for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.","authors":"Bin Wu,&nbsp;Zhenhua Wang,&nbsp;Qiang Zhang","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izy114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge regarding the economic outcomes of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) and oral Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) is limited. We conducted this analysis to assess the economic outcomes of anti-TNFα, antiadhesion molecule inhibitors (anti-AMi), and oral JAKi therapies for the treatment of UC from the perspectives of the United Kingdom (UK) and China, which are the representatives of high-income and middle-income regions, respectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model-based economic analysis was performed by incorporating effectiveness and utility data obtained from the literature and costs based on publicly available reports. The UK and Chinese health care perspectives were adopted to evaluate different intervention treatment sequences, including 14 treatment sequences consisting of conventional therapy, tofacitinib, adalimumab, vedolizumab, golimumab, and infliximab. The participants were the patients with moderate-to-severe UC eligible for anti-TNFα, anti-Ami, and JAKi treatment. Cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to other alternatives comprising adalimumab, golimumab, and infliximab, the use of a treatment sequence comprising tofacitinib and vedolizumab always had better health outcomes. The most cost-effective options in the UK included the sequences comprising tofacitinib and vedolizumab, and the most cost-effective treatment option in China was tofacitinib. There were uncertainties surrounding the results, the key drivers of which being the utility values, effectiveness of conventional therapy, and relative efficacy of the active treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment with tofacitinib and vedolizumab for moderate-to-severe UC is likely to be the most favorable cost-effective option in the high-income UK, and tofacitinib is the most cost-effective option in the middle-income China.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":"24 11","pages":"2291-2302"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ibd/izy114","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izy114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background: Knowledge regarding the economic outcomes of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) and oral Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) is limited. We conducted this analysis to assess the economic outcomes of anti-TNFα, antiadhesion molecule inhibitors (anti-AMi), and oral JAKi therapies for the treatment of UC from the perspectives of the United Kingdom (UK) and China, which are the representatives of high-income and middle-income regions, respectively.

Methods: A Markov model-based economic analysis was performed by incorporating effectiveness and utility data obtained from the literature and costs based on publicly available reports. The UK and Chinese health care perspectives were adopted to evaluate different intervention treatment sequences, including 14 treatment sequences consisting of conventional therapy, tofacitinib, adalimumab, vedolizumab, golimumab, and infliximab. The participants were the patients with moderate-to-severe UC eligible for anti-TNFα, anti-Ami, and JAKi treatment. Cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were reported.

Results: Compared to other alternatives comprising adalimumab, golimumab, and infliximab, the use of a treatment sequence comprising tofacitinib and vedolizumab always had better health outcomes. The most cost-effective options in the UK included the sequences comprising tofacitinib and vedolizumab, and the most cost-effective treatment option in China was tofacitinib. There were uncertainties surrounding the results, the key drivers of which being the utility values, effectiveness of conventional therapy, and relative efficacy of the active treatments.

Conclusions: The treatment with tofacitinib and vedolizumab for moderate-to-severe UC is likely to be the most favorable cost-effective option in the high-income UK, and tofacitinib is the most cost-effective option in the middle-income China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗中重度溃疡性结肠炎不同策略的成本-效果。
背景:关于抗肿瘤坏死因子-α (anti- tnf -α)和口服Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的经济效果的知识有限。我们从英国(UK)和中国(分别代表高收入和中等收入地区)的角度进行分析,评估抗tnf α、抗粘附分子抑制剂(anti-AMi)和口服JAKi治疗UC的经济效果。方法:通过结合从文献中获得的有效性和效用数据以及基于公开报告的成本,进行基于马尔可夫模型的经济分析。采用英国和中国的卫生保健视角评估不同的干预治疗序列,包括常规治疗、托法替尼、阿达木单抗、维多利单抗、戈利单抗和英夫利昔单抗等14个治疗序列。参与者是适合抗tnf α、抗ami和JAKi治疗的中重度UC患者。报告了成本、质量调整寿命年(QALYs)和增量成本-效果比(ICER)。结果:与包括阿达木单抗、戈利单抗和英夫利昔单抗的其他替代方案相比,使用包括托法替尼和维多单抗的治疗序列总是具有更好的健康结果。在英国,最具成本效益的治疗方案包括托法替尼和维多利单抗,而在中国,最具成本效益的治疗方案是托法替尼。结果存在不确定性,其关键驱动因素是效用值、常规治疗的有效性和积极治疗的相对疗效。结论:托法替尼联合维多利单抗治疗中重度UC可能是英国高收入人群中最有利的成本效益选择,而托法替尼是中国中等收入人群中最具成本效益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of mesocolic adipose hyperplasia in a rat 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid colitis model and comparison to creeping fat in Crohn disease. Artificial intelligence enhances screening efficiency for inflammatory bowel disease clinical trials: a prospective study. Electroacupuncture at Baliao Points Alleviates Ulcerative Colitis via α7nAChR-Mediated Macrophage Polarization and Gut Microbiota Modulation. Crypt branching in IBD: from histologic marker to digital pathology opportunity. Dysplasia detection using high-definition scopes with dye vs virtual chromoendoscopy in IBD: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1