Evaluation of a modified Cheatham-Platinum stent for the treatment of aortic coarctation by finite element modelling.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2018-04-27 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2048004018773958
Barbara Eu Burkhardt, Nicholas Byrne, Marí Nieves Velasco Forte, Francesco Iannaccone, Matthieu De Beule, Gareth J Morgan, Tarique Hussain
{"title":"Evaluation of a modified Cheatham-Platinum stent for the treatment of aortic coarctation by finite element modelling.","authors":"Barbara Eu Burkhardt,&nbsp;Nicholas Byrne,&nbsp;Marí Nieves Velasco Forte,&nbsp;Francesco Iannaccone,&nbsp;Matthieu De Beule,&nbsp;Gareth J Morgan,&nbsp;Tarique Hussain","doi":"10.1177/2048004018773958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Stent implantation for the treatment of aortic coarctation has become a standard approach for the management of older children and adults. Criteria for optimal stent design and construction remain undefined. This study used computational modelling to compare the performance of two generations of the Cheatham-Platinum stent (NuMED, Hopkinton, NY, USA) deployed in aortic coarctation using finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three-dimensional models of both stents, reverse engineered from microCT scans, were implanted in the aortic model of one representative patient. They were virtually expanded in the vessel with a 16 mm balloon and a pressure of 2 atm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conventional stent foreshortened to 96.5% of its initial length, whereas the new stent to 99.2% of its initial length. Diameters in 15 slices across the conventional stent were 11.6-15 mm (median 14.2 mm) and slightly higher across the new stent: 10.7-15.3 mm (median 14.5 mm) (p= 0.021). Apposition to the vessel wall was similar: conventional stent 31.1% and new stent 28.6% of total stent area.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new design Cheatham-Platinum stent showed similar deployment results compared to the conventional design. The new stent design showed slightly higher expansion, using the same delivery balloon. Patient-specific computational models can be used for virtual implantation of new aortic stents and promise to inform subsequent in vivo trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"7 ","pages":"2048004018773958"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004018773958","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004018773958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objectives: Stent implantation for the treatment of aortic coarctation has become a standard approach for the management of older children and adults. Criteria for optimal stent design and construction remain undefined. This study used computational modelling to compare the performance of two generations of the Cheatham-Platinum stent (NuMED, Hopkinton, NY, USA) deployed in aortic coarctation using finite element analysis.

Design: Three-dimensional models of both stents, reverse engineered from microCT scans, were implanted in the aortic model of one representative patient. They were virtually expanded in the vessel with a 16 mm balloon and a pressure of 2 atm.

Results: The conventional stent foreshortened to 96.5% of its initial length, whereas the new stent to 99.2% of its initial length. Diameters in 15 slices across the conventional stent were 11.6-15 mm (median 14.2 mm) and slightly higher across the new stent: 10.7-15.3 mm (median 14.5 mm) (p= 0.021). Apposition to the vessel wall was similar: conventional stent 31.1% and new stent 28.6% of total stent area.

Conclusions: The new design Cheatham-Platinum stent showed similar deployment results compared to the conventional design. The new stent design showed slightly higher expansion, using the same delivery balloon. Patient-specific computational models can be used for virtual implantation of new aortic stents and promise to inform subsequent in vivo trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过有限元模型评估改良Cheatham-Platinum支架治疗主动脉缩窄的效果。
目的:支架植入术治疗主动脉缩窄已成为治疗大龄儿童和成人的标准方法。最佳支架设计和结构的标准仍然不明确。本研究使用有限元分析计算模型来比较两代Cheatham-Platinum支架(NuMED, Hopkinton, NY, USA)在主动脉缩窄中的性能。设计:将两种支架的三维模型,通过微ct扫描进行逆向工程,植入一位代表性患者的主动脉模型中。在一个16毫米的气球和2atm的压力下,它们实际上在血管中膨胀。结果:常规支架缩短至其初始长度的96.5%,新型支架缩短至其初始长度的99.2%。常规支架的15片直径为11.6-15 mm(中位数14.2 mm),新支架的直径略高:10.7-15.3 mm(中位数14.5 mm) (p= 0.021)。与血管壁的接触相似:传统支架占总支架面积的31.1%,新支架占总支架面积的28.6%。结论:新设计的Cheatham-Platinum支架与传统设计相比具有相似的部署结果。新的支架设计显示出稍高的膨胀,使用相同的输送球囊。患者特异性计算模型可用于新主动脉支架的虚拟植入,并有望为随后的体内试验提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biplane 3D overlay guidance for congenital heart disease to assist cardiac catheterization interventions-A pilot study. Impact of the completeness of revascularization and high bleeding risk status in acute coronary syndrome patients with multi-vessel disease: A retrospective analysis. Metabolic syndrome and its associated factors among adults with cardiac diseases: A cross-sectional comparative group study. Causal roles of immune cells in cardiovascular diseases: A Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Associations of variability in body mass index with cardiovascular outcomes in the general population: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1