Low starting dosage of infliximab with possible escalating dosage in psoriatic arthritis gives the same treatment results as standard dosage of adalimumab or etanercept: results from the nationwide Icelandic ICEBIO registry.

IF 5.2 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2018-05-04 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PTT.S161522
Bjorn Gudbjornsson, Arni Jon Geirsson, Niels Steen Krogh
{"title":"Low starting dosage of infliximab with possible escalating dosage in psoriatic arthritis gives the same treatment results as standard dosage of adalimumab or etanercept: results from the nationwide Icelandic ICEBIO registry.","authors":"Bjorn Gudbjornsson,&nbsp;Arni Jon Geirsson,&nbsp;Niels Steen Krogh","doi":"10.2147/PTT.S161522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore differences in response to a low dosage regimen of infliximab with an escalating dosage in comparison to a standard dosage of etanercept and adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biologically naïve PsA patients who were beginning anti-TNF-α therapy were selected from the ICEBIO registry. Demographics and clinical differences were compared in four treatment groups: infliximab <4 mg/kg; infliximab >4 mg/kg; etanercept or adalimumab at baseline and on follow-up (6 and 12 months, last visit). The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used for comparison of the groups and the Wilcoxon test to compare the two infliximab dosage regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighty-five patients (61% female) were identified; 84 patients received infliximab, 66 etanercept, and 35 adalimumab. A total of 19% of the patients treated with infliximab escalated their dosage ≥4 mg/kg. No significant differences were observed at baseline in respect to visual analog scale (VAS) pain, VAS fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire, C-reactive protein (CRP), numbers of swollen or tender joints, or Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP values. A similar treatment response was observed in all four treatment groups on follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In respect to treatment effects, a low dosage of infliximab with possible escalating dosage is acceptable for the majority of PsA patients who are in need of biological treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74589,"journal":{"name":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/PTT.S161522","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PTT.S161522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To explore differences in response to a low dosage regimen of infliximab with an escalating dosage in comparison to a standard dosage of etanercept and adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: Biologically naïve PsA patients who were beginning anti-TNF-α therapy were selected from the ICEBIO registry. Demographics and clinical differences were compared in four treatment groups: infliximab <4 mg/kg; infliximab >4 mg/kg; etanercept or adalimumab at baseline and on follow-up (6 and 12 months, last visit). The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used for comparison of the groups and the Wilcoxon test to compare the two infliximab dosage regimens.

Results: One hundred and eighty-five patients (61% female) were identified; 84 patients received infliximab, 66 etanercept, and 35 adalimumab. A total of 19% of the patients treated with infliximab escalated their dosage ≥4 mg/kg. No significant differences were observed at baseline in respect to visual analog scale (VAS) pain, VAS fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire, C-reactive protein (CRP), numbers of swollen or tender joints, or Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP values. A similar treatment response was observed in all four treatment groups on follow-up.

Conclusion: In respect to treatment effects, a low dosage of infliximab with possible escalating dosage is acceptable for the majority of PsA patients who are in need of biological treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自冰岛ICEBIO注册中心的结果显示,低起始剂量的英夫利昔单抗治疗银屑病关节炎的效果与标准剂量的阿达木单抗或依那西普相同。
目的:探讨银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者对英夫利昔单抗低剂量方案的反应差异,并与标准剂量依那西普和阿达木单抗进行比较。方法:从ICEBIO登记处选择生物学naïve开始抗tnf -α治疗的PsA患者。比较4个治疗组的人口统计学和临床差异:英夫利昔单抗4 mg/kg;依那西普或阿达木单抗基线和随访(6个月和12个月,最后一次就诊)。组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验,两种英夫利昔单抗给药方案的比较采用Wilcoxon检验。结果:共发现185例患者(61%为女性);84例患者接受英夫利昔单抗、66例依那西普和35例阿达木单抗治疗。接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的患者中,有19%的患者将剂量增加到≥4mg /kg。在基线时,在视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛、VAS疲劳、健康评估问卷、c -反应蛋白(CRP)、肿胀或压痛关节数量或疾病活动评分(DAS) 28-CRP值方面没有观察到显著差异。在随访中,所有四个治疗组均观察到类似的治疗反应。结论:就治疗效果而言,对于大多数需要生物治疗的PsA患者来说,低剂量英夫利昔单抗并可能增加剂量是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adapting the Goeckerman Regimen for Psoriasis Treatment in Kenya: A Case Study of Successful Management in a Resource-Limited Setting. Commercial Diagnostics and Emerging Precision Medicine Technologies in Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis. Effectiveness and Drug Survival of Ixekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Real-World Data from Bucharest, Romania. Burden of Herpes Zoster Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis in the United States. The Perspective of Cannabidiol in Psoriasis Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1