Advantages of wound retractor device versus rigid trocar at camera port in video-assisted thoracic surgery-a single institution experience.

Journal of visualized surgery Pub Date : 2018-04-03 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.21037/jovs.2018.03.15
Federico Raveglia, Ugo Cioffi, Matilde De Simone, Alessandro Rizzi, Andrea Leporati, Carmine Tinelli, Marco Chiarelli, Alessandro Baisi
{"title":"Advantages of wound retractor device versus rigid trocar at camera port in video-assisted thoracic surgery-a single institution experience.","authors":"Federico Raveglia,&nbsp;Ugo Cioffi,&nbsp;Matilde De Simone,&nbsp;Alessandro Rizzi,&nbsp;Andrea Leporati,&nbsp;Carmine Tinelli,&nbsp;Marco Chiarelli,&nbsp;Alessandro Baisi","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.03.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>rigid trocars are widely adopted in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), despite some disadvantages: (I) cannula strong pressure on intercostal nerve stimulating postoperative pain; (II) limited movement of thoracoscopic devices on their fulcrum when extreme acute angles with the chest wall are needed. Wound retractor (WR) device, designed for laparoscopic surgery, it is also used in VATS, but to protect mini-thoracotomy. We compared the use of extra-small WR versus rigid trocar at camera port that is the most painful thoracostomy. The aim was to determine if WR is associated with less postoperative pain and better scope maneuverability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single institution prospective study recorded and approved by ethics committee at our hospital. From October 2016 to June 2017, we enrolled 40 patients (statistical power 88%), randomized into two different groups. Group A (20 patients) underwent VATS lung resection using WR at camera port, group B (20 patients) using rigid trocar. Intra-operative data collected were maximum acute angle obtained between the camera and chest wall and chest wall thickness. Pain was measured by numerical analog scales (NAS) at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after surgery. We also measured total morphine consumption at 72 h administered by patient controlled analgesia (PCA) system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical significance was found in the demographic traits of the two groups (P=1). Statistically significant differences were found in favor of group A for both pain control, morphine consumption (P<0.001) and camera maneuverability (described as maximum acute angle obtained/chest wall thickness) (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>patients who had WR showed less postoperative pain. Moreover, WR presented other advantages: camera protection by small bleeding from chest wall, adaptability with every chest wall thickness, absence of skin injury around the port. We suggest its use instead of rigid trocar.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.15","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of visualized surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: rigid trocars are widely adopted in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), despite some disadvantages: (I) cannula strong pressure on intercostal nerve stimulating postoperative pain; (II) limited movement of thoracoscopic devices on their fulcrum when extreme acute angles with the chest wall are needed. Wound retractor (WR) device, designed for laparoscopic surgery, it is also used in VATS, but to protect mini-thoracotomy. We compared the use of extra-small WR versus rigid trocar at camera port that is the most painful thoracostomy. The aim was to determine if WR is associated with less postoperative pain and better scope maneuverability.

Methods: This is a single institution prospective study recorded and approved by ethics committee at our hospital. From October 2016 to June 2017, we enrolled 40 patients (statistical power 88%), randomized into two different groups. Group A (20 patients) underwent VATS lung resection using WR at camera port, group B (20 patients) using rigid trocar. Intra-operative data collected were maximum acute angle obtained between the camera and chest wall and chest wall thickness. Pain was measured by numerical analog scales (NAS) at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after surgery. We also measured total morphine consumption at 72 h administered by patient controlled analgesia (PCA) system.

Results: No statistical significance was found in the demographic traits of the two groups (P=1). Statistically significant differences were found in favor of group A for both pain control, morphine consumption (P<0.001) and camera maneuverability (described as maximum acute angle obtained/chest wall thickness) (P<0.001).

Conclusions: patients who had WR showed less postoperative pain. Moreover, WR presented other advantages: camera protection by small bleeding from chest wall, adaptability with every chest wall thickness, absence of skin injury around the port. We suggest its use instead of rigid trocar.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在视频辅助胸外科手术中,伤口牵开装置与刚性套管针在摄像口的优势-单一机构的经验。
背景:硬套管针广泛应用于胸外科手术(VATS),但存在以下缺点:(1)套管对肋间神经压力大,刺激术后疼痛;(II)当需要与胸壁形成极锐角时,胸腔镜装置在其支点上的运动受限。伤口牵开器(WR)装置,专为腹腔镜手术设计,也用于VATS,但用于保护小开胸。我们比较了在相机口使用超小WR和刚性套管针,后者是最痛苦的开胸手术。目的是确定WR是否与更少的术后疼痛和更好的范围可操作性有关。方法:本研究为经我院伦理委员会批准的单机构前瞻性研究。2016年10月至2017年6月,我们招募了40例患者(统计能力88%),随机分为两组。A组(20例)采用WR在相机口行VATS肺切除术,B组(20例)采用刚性套管针。术中收集的数据包括相机与胸壁之间的最大锐角和胸壁厚度。分别于术后6、12、24、48、72小时采用数值模拟量表(NAS)测量疼痛。我们还测量了病人自控镇痛(PCA)系统给药72 h时吗啡的总用量。结果:两组患者人口学特征比较,差异无统计学意义(P=1)。A组在疼痛控制、吗啡使用两方面的差异均有统计学意义(p)。结论:WR患者术后疼痛减轻。此外,WR还具有其他优点:胸壁小出血保护摄像机,适应各种胸壁厚度,端口周围无皮肤损伤。我们建议使用它来代替刚性套管针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
It happened tomorrow—transcatheter treatments in the lifetime management of aortic valve diseases Mastering the maze: navigating prolonged air leak in thoracic surgery Systolic doming or ‘hockey-stick sign’ of the aortic valve in rheumatic valve disease Paraconduit hernia after minimally invasive esophagectomy Robotic thoracic surgery—fewer ports and eagerly awaited new platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1