{"title":"Stepwise Excavation.","authors":"Lars Bjørndal","doi":"10.1159/000487834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most recent inspiration for stepwise carious tissue removal in 2 stages originates from the knowhow on intralesion changes in deep carious lesions. The environmental change that takes place during the first stage of carious tissue removal is aiming for the arrest of the deep lesion, by placing a temporary restoration on top of the soft carious dentine. The cavity is optimised during the second stage for a final restoration, as potential shrinkage of the retained dentine may occur during the period of carious dentine arrestment. However, basic clinical limitations on the objective evaluation of pulp inflammation creates dilemmas in treating the deep lesions. Also, a global consensus is lacking for the definition of a so-called deep lesion. Finally, an optimal evidence goal for choosing the best approach for deep lesion treatment in adults has still not been fully defined. Taken together, it may not be a surprise that treatment variation is reported amongst general dental practitioners on deep caries treatment. Here, facts are presented supporting the treatment, including some drawbacks, as well as updated guidelines for the procedure. Recent clinical high evidence data from randomised clinical trials significantly favour the stepwise approach as a predictable and reliable treatment for well-defined deep carious lesions located in the pulpal quarter of the dentine in terms of avoiding pulp exposure, keeping the tooth vital and without the development of apical pathosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":"27 ","pages":"68-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000487834","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000487834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
The most recent inspiration for stepwise carious tissue removal in 2 stages originates from the knowhow on intralesion changes in deep carious lesions. The environmental change that takes place during the first stage of carious tissue removal is aiming for the arrest of the deep lesion, by placing a temporary restoration on top of the soft carious dentine. The cavity is optimised during the second stage for a final restoration, as potential shrinkage of the retained dentine may occur during the period of carious dentine arrestment. However, basic clinical limitations on the objective evaluation of pulp inflammation creates dilemmas in treating the deep lesions. Also, a global consensus is lacking for the definition of a so-called deep lesion. Finally, an optimal evidence goal for choosing the best approach for deep lesion treatment in adults has still not been fully defined. Taken together, it may not be a surprise that treatment variation is reported amongst general dental practitioners on deep caries treatment. Here, facts are presented supporting the treatment, including some drawbacks, as well as updated guidelines for the procedure. Recent clinical high evidence data from randomised clinical trials significantly favour the stepwise approach as a predictable and reliable treatment for well-defined deep carious lesions located in the pulpal quarter of the dentine in terms of avoiding pulp exposure, keeping the tooth vital and without the development of apical pathosis.
期刊介绍:
For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.