Potential factors associated with knee pain in cyclists: a systematic review.

IF 1.3 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2018-05-23 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJSM.S136653
Rodrigo Rico Bini, Alice Flores Bini
{"title":"Potential factors associated with knee pain in cyclists: a systematic review.","authors":"Rodrigo Rico Bini,&nbsp;Alice Flores Bini","doi":"10.2147/OAJSM.S136653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The potential factors associated with overuse injuries and pain in cyclists that are supported by evidence remain unclear. Our study aimed at assessing, using a systematic search of the most updated evidence, the main factors related to overuse knee-related pain and/or injuries in cyclists. The search assessed any potential mechanism related to knee pain or injury that could be used in the clinical practice. Databases were searched (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO). Studies were included if they presented results from original studies. They had to include, preferably but not limited to, recreational and/or competitive cyclists with or without knee pain. Quality of articles was assessed. Eleven articles were deemed eligible for full text appraisal. Studies involved generally the assessment of biomechanical outcomes associated with knee pain in cyclists. Overall, studies showed that cyclists with knee pain present larger knee adduction and larger ankle dorsiflexion and differences in activation for hamstrings and quadriceps muscles. Unclear results were observed for knee moments and no differences were observed for knee flexion angle, tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces. It is important to state that varied types of knee pain were mixed in most studies, with 2 focused on anterior-related pain. Cyclists with overuse-related pain or injuries on their knees presented an increased medial projection of their knees and an altered activation of the Vastus Medialis and Vastus Lateralis muscles. However, this limited evidence is based on retrospective studies comparing cyclists with and without pain, which limits the conclusion on how cyclists develop knee pain and what are the main options for treatment of knee pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":51644,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"9 ","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJSM.S136653","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S136653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The potential factors associated with overuse injuries and pain in cyclists that are supported by evidence remain unclear. Our study aimed at assessing, using a systematic search of the most updated evidence, the main factors related to overuse knee-related pain and/or injuries in cyclists. The search assessed any potential mechanism related to knee pain or injury that could be used in the clinical practice. Databases were searched (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO). Studies were included if they presented results from original studies. They had to include, preferably but not limited to, recreational and/or competitive cyclists with or without knee pain. Quality of articles was assessed. Eleven articles were deemed eligible for full text appraisal. Studies involved generally the assessment of biomechanical outcomes associated with knee pain in cyclists. Overall, studies showed that cyclists with knee pain present larger knee adduction and larger ankle dorsiflexion and differences in activation for hamstrings and quadriceps muscles. Unclear results were observed for knee moments and no differences were observed for knee flexion angle, tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces. It is important to state that varied types of knee pain were mixed in most studies, with 2 focused on anterior-related pain. Cyclists with overuse-related pain or injuries on their knees presented an increased medial projection of their knees and an altered activation of the Vastus Medialis and Vastus Lateralis muscles. However, this limited evidence is based on retrospective studies comparing cyclists with and without pain, which limits the conclusion on how cyclists develop knee pain and what are the main options for treatment of knee pain.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与骑自行车者膝盖疼痛相关的潜在因素:一项系统综述。
有证据支持的与骑车者过度使用损伤和疼痛相关的潜在因素仍不清楚。我们的研究旨在通过对最新证据的系统搜索,评估与骑自行车者过度使用膝盖相关疼痛和/或损伤相关的主要因素。这项研究评估了任何与膝关节疼痛或损伤相关的潜在机制,这些机制可以用于临床实践。检索数据库(即PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和EBSCO)。如果研究提供了原始研究的结果,则纳入研究。他们必须包括,最好但不限于,有或没有膝盖疼痛的休闲和/或竞技自行车手。评估文章的质量。11篇文章被认为有资格进行全文评估。研究通常涉及与骑自行车者膝盖疼痛相关的生物力学结果的评估。总的来说,研究表明,有膝关节疼痛的自行车运动员表现出更大的膝关节内收和更大的踝关节背屈,并且腘绳肌和股四头肌的激活存在差异。观察到的膝关节力矩结果不明确,膝关节屈曲角度、胫股力和髌骨股力没有差异。需要指出的是,在大多数研究中,不同类型的膝关节疼痛是混合的,其中2项研究的重点是与前部相关的疼痛。骑自行车的人膝盖有过度使用相关的疼痛或损伤,他们的膝盖内侧突出增加,股内侧肌和股外侧肌的激活改变。然而,这些有限的证据是基于回顾性研究,比较有和没有疼痛的骑车者,这限制了骑车者如何产生膝盖疼痛和治疗膝盖疼痛的主要选择的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short-Term Intermittent Normobaric Hypoxia Combined with Light Exercise Improves Acclimatization of Cardiorespiratory Function in Inactive Adults. Microbial Champions: The Influence of Gut Microbiota on Athletic Performance via the Gut-Brain Axis. Video Analysis of Elite American Football Athletes During Vertical Jump. Exercise into Pain in Chronic Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 6-Month Follow-Up. Achilles Tendon Pain in Male Professional Football Players - A Prospective Five-Season Study of 88 Injuries from the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1