Evaluating the Evidence Behind Treating Osteoporosis in the Oldest Adults.

Daniel Wolverton, David P Elliott
{"title":"Evaluating the Evidence Behind Treating Osteoporosis in the Oldest Adults.","authors":"Daniel Wolverton,&nbsp;David P Elliott","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2018.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review clinical trial data supporting the use of drugs to treat osteoporosis in the oldest adults, 74 years of age and older.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The PubMed database (September 1969-June 2017) was searched utilizing the following Medical Subject Headings terms: osteoporosis, postmenopausal, aged, 80 and over, and fractures, bone, in combination with diphosphonates, denosumab, parathyroid hormone, raloxifene, and calcitonin.</p><p><strong>Study selection/data extraction: </strong>An initial search revealed 119 results, of which 18 clinical trials were included. Studies were selected that featured a randomized controlled design, fractures reported as a key outcome, and included subjects within the desired age range.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Osteoporosis is common among older adults, and with an increasingly aging population, it will be imperative to know how to best manage this condition. Sparse clinical evidence exists for the impact of osteoporosis treatments in the given age range, and no clinical trials have exclusively looked at this age group as the primary target.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Studies that included participants in this age group were found for alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid, denosumab, teriparatide, and abaloparatide. Efficacy appears to be maintained with advancing age for alendronate, zoledronic acid, denosumab, and teriparatide as demonstrated by post hoc analyses of pivotal trials. Alendronate has only demonstrated benefit in patients with previous vertebral fractures because of the study design of the trial. Abaloparatide showed improvement with treatment in the overall population, but age-specific analyses have not been published at this time.</p>","PeriodicalId":45985,"journal":{"name":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4140/TCP.n.2018.308","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2018.308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: To review clinical trial data supporting the use of drugs to treat osteoporosis in the oldest adults, 74 years of age and older.

Data sources: The PubMed database (September 1969-June 2017) was searched utilizing the following Medical Subject Headings terms: osteoporosis, postmenopausal, aged, 80 and over, and fractures, bone, in combination with diphosphonates, denosumab, parathyroid hormone, raloxifene, and calcitonin.

Study selection/data extraction: An initial search revealed 119 results, of which 18 clinical trials were included. Studies were selected that featured a randomized controlled design, fractures reported as a key outcome, and included subjects within the desired age range.

Data synthesis: Osteoporosis is common among older adults, and with an increasingly aging population, it will be imperative to know how to best manage this condition. Sparse clinical evidence exists for the impact of osteoporosis treatments in the given age range, and no clinical trials have exclusively looked at this age group as the primary target.

Conclusion: Studies that included participants in this age group were found for alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid, denosumab, teriparatide, and abaloparatide. Efficacy appears to be maintained with advancing age for alendronate, zoledronic acid, denosumab, and teriparatide as demonstrated by post hoc analyses of pivotal trials. Alendronate has only demonstrated benefit in patients with previous vertebral fractures because of the study design of the trial. Abaloparatide showed improvement with treatment in the overall population, but age-specific analyses have not been published at this time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估老年人骨质疏松症治疗的证据。
目的:回顾支持使用药物治疗74岁及以上老年人骨质疏松症的临床试验数据。数据来源:PubMed数据库(1969年9月- 2017年6月)使用以下医学主题词进行检索:骨质疏松症,绝经后,老年,80岁及以上,骨折,骨,与二磷酸盐,地诺单抗,甲状旁腺激素,雷洛昔芬和降钙素联合使用。研究选择/数据提取:初步检索显示119项结果,其中包括18项临床试验。研究选择了具有随机对照设计、骨折作为主要结局的研究,并纳入了在预期年龄范围内的受试者。数据综合:骨质疏松症在老年人中很常见,随着人口老龄化的加剧,了解如何最好地管理这种情况将是势在必行的。骨质疏松症治疗在特定年龄范围内的影响缺乏临床证据,也没有临床试验专门将这一年龄组作为主要目标。结论:在该年龄组的研究中发现了阿仑膦酸、利塞膦酸、唑来膦酸、地诺单抗、特立帕肽和阿巴帕肽。关键试验的事后分析表明,阿仑膦酸、唑来膦酸、地诺单抗和特立帕肽的疗效似乎随着年龄的增长而保持不变。由于试验的研究设计,阿仑膦酸钠仅在既往椎体骨折患者中显示出益处。Abaloparatide在总体人群中显示出治疗后的改善,但目前还没有发表针对特定年龄的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Vision ... The Society"s long-term desire, aspiration, and core purpose. The vision of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists is optimal medication management and improved health outcomes for all older persons. Mission ... The Society"s strategic position, focus, and reason for being. The American Society of Consultant Pharmacists empowers pharmacists to enhance quality of care for all older persons through the appropriate use of medication and the promotion of healthy aging.
期刊最新文献
Bylines. Identifying Cognitive Impairment in an Older Adult Using Two Different Screening Tools. Statins: The Burglar of Memory? Clinical Pharmacist Intervention to Engage Older Adults in Reducing Use of Alprazolam. Digging Deeper Into the Patient-Driven Payment Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1