Predicting Future Elective Colon Resection for Diverticulitis Using Patterns of Health Care Utilization.

Lucas W Thornblade, David R Flum, Abraham D Flaxman
{"title":"Predicting Future Elective Colon Resection for Diverticulitis Using Patterns of Health Care Utilization.","authors":"Lucas W Thornblade,&nbsp;David R Flum,&nbsp;Abraham D Flaxman","doi":"10.5334/egems.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent diverticulitis is the most common reason for elective colon surgery and, although professional societies now recommend against early resection, its use continues to rise. Shared decision making decreases use of low-value surgery but identifying which patients are most likely to elect surgery has proven difficult. We hypothesized that Machine Learning algorithms using health care utilization (HCU) data can predict future clinical events including early resection for diverticulitis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We developed models for predicting future surgery among patients with new diagnoses of diverticulitis (2009-2012) from the MarketScan® database. Claims data (diagnosis, procedural, and drug codes) were used to train three Machine Learning algorithms to predict surgery occurring between 52 and 104 weeks following diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 82,231 patients with incident diverticulitis (age 51 ± 8 years, 52% female), 1.2% went on to elective colon resection. Using maximal training data (152 consecutive weeks of claims), the Gradient Boosting Machine model predicted elective surgery with an area under the curve (AUC) of 75% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 71-79%). Models trained on less data resulted in less accurate prediction (AUC: 68% [64-74%] using 128 weeks, 57% [53-63%] using 104 weeks). The majority of resections (85%) were identified as low-value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By applying Machine Learning to HCU data from the time around a diagnosis of diverticulitis, we predicted elective surgery weeks to months in advance, with moderate accuracy. Identifying patients who are most likely to elect surgery for diverticulitis provides an opportunity for effective shared decision making initiatives aimed at reducing the use of costly low-value care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72880,"journal":{"name":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983027/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Recurrent diverticulitis is the most common reason for elective colon surgery and, although professional societies now recommend against early resection, its use continues to rise. Shared decision making decreases use of low-value surgery but identifying which patients are most likely to elect surgery has proven difficult. We hypothesized that Machine Learning algorithms using health care utilization (HCU) data can predict future clinical events including early resection for diverticulitis.

Study design: We developed models for predicting future surgery among patients with new diagnoses of diverticulitis (2009-2012) from the MarketScan® database. Claims data (diagnosis, procedural, and drug codes) were used to train three Machine Learning algorithms to predict surgery occurring between 52 and 104 weeks following diagnosis.

Results: Of 82,231 patients with incident diverticulitis (age 51 ± 8 years, 52% female), 1.2% went on to elective colon resection. Using maximal training data (152 consecutive weeks of claims), the Gradient Boosting Machine model predicted elective surgery with an area under the curve (AUC) of 75% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 71-79%). Models trained on less data resulted in less accurate prediction (AUC: 68% [64-74%] using 128 weeks, 57% [53-63%] using 104 weeks). The majority of resections (85%) were identified as low-value.

Conclusion: By applying Machine Learning to HCU data from the time around a diagnosis of diverticulitis, we predicted elective surgery weeks to months in advance, with moderate accuracy. Identifying patients who are most likely to elect surgery for diverticulitis provides an opportunity for effective shared decision making initiatives aimed at reducing the use of costly low-value care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用医疗保健利用模式预测憩室炎的未来选择性结肠切除术。
背景:复发性憩室炎是择期结肠手术最常见的原因,尽管专业协会现在不建议早期切除,但其使用仍在继续增加。共同决策减少了低价值手术的使用,但确定哪些患者最有可能选择手术已被证明是困难的。我们假设使用医疗保健利用(HCU)数据的机器学习算法可以预测未来的临床事件,包括憩室炎的早期切除。研究设计:我们从MarketScan®数据库中开发了预测新诊断为憩室炎的患者(2009-2012)未来手术的模型。索赔数据(诊断、程序和药物代码)用于训练三种机器学习算法,以预测诊断后52至104周内发生的手术。结果:在82231例突发憩室炎患者(年龄51±8岁,52%为女性)中,1.2%的患者选择了择期结肠切除术。使用最大训练数据(连续152周的索赔),梯度增强机器模型预测曲线下面积(AUC)为75%(95%不确定区间[UI] 71-79%)的选择性手术。使用较少数据训练的模型导致预测准确性较低(使用128周的AUC为68%[64-74%],使用104周的AUC为57%[53-63%])。大多数切除(85%)被确定为低价值。结论:通过将机器学习应用于憩室炎诊断前后的HCU数据,我们可以提前几周到几个月预测选择性手术,准确度中等。确定最有可能选择憩室炎手术的患者为有效的共同决策提供了机会,旨在减少使用昂贵的低价值护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Novel Quality Improvement-Based Approach to Data Quality Monitoring and Enhancement in a Multipurpose Clinical Registry. A Spatial Analysis of Health Disparities Associated with Antibiotic Resistant Infections in Children Living in Atlanta (2002–2010) Predicting the Incidence of Pressure Ulcers in the Intensive Care Unit Using Machine Learning Applying a Commercialization-Readiness Framework to Optimize Value for Achieving Sustainability of an Electronic Health Data Research Network and Its Data Capabilities: The SAFTINet Experience. Innovative Data Science to Transform Health Care: All the Pieces Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1