Using the Rasch Model to Investigate Inter-board Comparability of Examination Standards in GCSE.

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Qingping He, Michelle Meadows
{"title":"Using the Rasch Model to Investigate Inter-board Comparability of Examination Standards in GCSE.","authors":"Qingping He,&nbsp;Michelle Meadows","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By treating each examination as a polytomous item and a grade that a student achieved in the exam as a score on the item, the partial credit model (PCM) has been used to analyse data from examinations in 16 GCSE subjects taken by 16-year olds in England. These examinations are provided by four different exam boards. By further treating students taking the exams testing the same subject but provided by different exam boards as different subgroups, differential category functioning (DCF) analysis was used to investigate the comparability of standards at specific grades in the examinations between the exam boards. It was found that for most of the grades across the examinations, the magnitude of the DCF effect with respect to exam boards for the majority of the subjects studied is small, with the differences between grade difficulties for individual exam boards and the all-board difficulty in the unit of grade being less than one fifth of a grade. The effect of DCF varies between subjects and between grades within the same subject, with higher grades shown to be generally more comparable in standards than the lower grades between the exam boards.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"19 2","pages":"129-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By treating each examination as a polytomous item and a grade that a student achieved in the exam as a score on the item, the partial credit model (PCM) has been used to analyse data from examinations in 16 GCSE subjects taken by 16-year olds in England. These examinations are provided by four different exam boards. By further treating students taking the exams testing the same subject but provided by different exam boards as different subgroups, differential category functioning (DCF) analysis was used to investigate the comparability of standards at specific grades in the examinations between the exam boards. It was found that for most of the grades across the examinations, the magnitude of the DCF effect with respect to exam boards for the majority of the subjects studied is small, with the differences between grade difficulties for individual exam boards and the all-board difficulty in the unit of grade being less than one fifth of a grade. The effect of DCF varies between subjects and between grades within the same subject, with higher grades shown to be generally more comparable in standards than the lower grades between the exam boards.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用Rasch模型研究GCSE考试标准的校际可比性。
部分学分模型(PCM)通过将每个考试视为一个多分制项目,并将学生在考试中取得的成绩作为该项目的分数,用于分析英国16岁学生参加的16门普通中等教育证书科目的考试数据。这些考试由四个不同的考试委员会提供。通过进一步将参加同一科目考试但由不同考试委员会提供的考试的学生作为不同的亚组,差分类别功能(DCF)分析用于调查考试委员会之间特定年级考试标准的可比性。研究发现,对于考试中的大多数年级,大多数科目的DCF效应对考试委员会的影响程度很小,个别考试委员会的年级难度与以年级为单位的全体班级难度之间的差异小于五分之一。DCF的效果在不同科目之间和同一科目的不同年级之间有所不同,在考试委员会之间,较高的年级通常比较低的年级在标准上更具可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of Egalitarian Education Questionnaire using Rasch Measurement Model. Bootstrap Estimate of Bias for Intraclass Correlation. Rasch's Logistic Model Applied to Growth. Psychometric Properties of the General Movement Optimality Score using Rasch Measurement. Rasch Analysis of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale: Evidence for the Abbreviated Version.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1