Overcoming Barriers to Quantification and Comparison of Electrocardiographic Imaging Methods: A Community-Based Approach.

Computing in cardiology Pub Date : 2017-09-01 Epub Date: 2018-04-05 DOI:10.22489/CinC.2017.370-289
Sandesh Ghimire, Jwala Dhamala, Jaume Coll-Font, Jess D Tate, Maria S Guillem, Dana H Brooks, Rob S MacLeod, Linwei Wang
{"title":"Overcoming Barriers to Quantification and Comparison of Electrocardiographic Imaging Methods: A Community-Based Approach.","authors":"Sandesh Ghimire,&nbsp;Jwala Dhamala,&nbsp;Jaume Coll-Font,&nbsp;Jess D Tate,&nbsp;Maria S Guillem,&nbsp;Dana H Brooks,&nbsp;Rob S MacLeod,&nbsp;Linwei Wang","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2017.370-289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been a recent upsurge in the development of electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) methods, along with a significant increase in clinical application. To better assess the state-of-the-art, enable reliable progress, and facilitate clinical adoption, it is important to be able to compare results in a comprehensive manner, scientifically and clinically. However, studies vary in modeling choices, computational methods, validation mechanisms and metrics, and clinical applications, making unified evaluation and comparison of ECGI a critical challenge. This paper describes initial results of a project to address this challenge via a community-based approach organized by the Consortium for Electrocardiographic Imaging (CEI). We detail different aspects of this collective effort including a data sharing repository, a platform for comparison of different algorithms and modeling approaches on the same datasets, several active workgroups and progress made along these directions. We also summarize the results from groups participating in this collaboration and contributing solutions by applying their methods to the same dataset for comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":72683,"journal":{"name":"Computing in cardiology","volume":"44 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007992/pdf/nihms934988.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computing in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2017.370-289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

There has been a recent upsurge in the development of electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) methods, along with a significant increase in clinical application. To better assess the state-of-the-art, enable reliable progress, and facilitate clinical adoption, it is important to be able to compare results in a comprehensive manner, scientifically and clinically. However, studies vary in modeling choices, computational methods, validation mechanisms and metrics, and clinical applications, making unified evaluation and comparison of ECGI a critical challenge. This paper describes initial results of a project to address this challenge via a community-based approach organized by the Consortium for Electrocardiographic Imaging (CEI). We detail different aspects of this collective effort including a data sharing repository, a platform for comparison of different algorithms and modeling approaches on the same datasets, several active workgroups and progress made along these directions. We also summarize the results from groups participating in this collaboration and contributing solutions by applying their methods to the same dataset for comparison.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克服量化和比较心电图成像方法的障碍:基于社区的方法。
近年来,随着心电图成像(ECGI)方法的发展,临床应用也有了显著的增加。为了更好地评估最新技术,实现可靠的进展,并促进临床应用,能够全面、科学和临床地比较结果是很重要的。然而,研究在建模选择、计算方法、验证机制和指标以及临床应用方面各不相同,这使得ECGI的统一评估和比较成为一项关键挑战。本文描述了一个项目的初步结果,该项目通过由心电图成像协会(CEI)组织的以社区为基础的方法来解决这一挑战。我们详细介绍了这一集体努力的不同方面,包括数据共享存储库、在相同数据集上比较不同算法和建模方法的平台、几个活跃的工作组以及沿着这些方向取得的进展。我们还总结了参与此次合作的小组的结果,并通过将他们的方法应用于同一数据集进行比较来提供解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transfer Learning for Improved Classification of Drivers in Atrial Fibrillation. Effects of Biventricular Pacing Locations on Anti-Tachycardia Pacing Success in a Patient-Specific Model. Deep Learning System for Left Ventricular Assist Device Candidate Assessment from Electrocardiograms. Capturing the Influence of Conduction Velocity on Epicardial Activation Patterns Using Uncertainty Quantification. Comparison of Machine Learning Detection of Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using Individual ECG Leads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1