Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment.

Punishment & society Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-05-10 DOI:10.1177/1462474516649174
Michelle S Phelps
{"title":"Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment.","authors":"Michelle S Phelps","doi":"10.1177/1462474516649174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scholarship on the expansion of the U.S. carceral state has primarily focused on imprisonment rates. Yet the majority of adults under formal criminal justice control are on probation, an \"alternative\" form of supervision. This article develops the concept of <i>mass probation</i> and builds a typology of state control regimes that theorizes both the scale and type of punishment states employ. Drawing on Bureau of Justice Statistics data from 1980 and 2010, I analyze whether mass probation developed in the same places, affecting the same demographic groups and driven by the same criminal justice trends, as mass imprisonment. The results show that mass probation was a unique state development, expanding in unusual places like Minnesota and Washington. The conclusions argue for a reimagining of the causes and consequences of the carceral state to incorporate the expansion of probation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74620,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & society","volume":"19 1","pages":"53-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1462474516649174","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Punishment & society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516649174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarship on the expansion of the U.S. carceral state has primarily focused on imprisonment rates. Yet the majority of adults under formal criminal justice control are on probation, an "alternative" form of supervision. This article develops the concept of mass probation and builds a typology of state control regimes that theorizes both the scale and type of punishment states employ. Drawing on Bureau of Justice Statistics data from 1980 and 2010, I analyze whether mass probation developed in the same places, affecting the same demographic groups and driven by the same criminal justice trends, as mass imprisonment. The results show that mass probation was a unique state development, expanding in unusual places like Minnesota and Washington. The conclusions argue for a reimagining of the causes and consequences of the carceral state to incorporate the expansion of probation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模缓刑:迈向更健全的国家惩罚变化理论。
关于美国监狱扩张的研究主要集中在监禁率上。然而,大多数受到正式刑事司法控制的成年人都是缓刑,这是一种“替代”的监督形式。本文发展了大规模缓刑的概念,并建立了一个国家控制制度的类型学,将国家采用的惩罚的规模和类型理论化。根据美国司法统计局(Bureau of Justice Statistics) 1980年至2010年的数据,我分析了大规模缓刑是否与大规模监禁一样,在同样的地方发展,影响同样的人口群体,受到同样的刑事司法趋势的驱动。结果表明,大规模缓刑是一个独特的州发展,在明尼苏达州和华盛顿州等不寻常的地方扩大。结论主张重新设想监禁状态的原因和后果,以纳入缓刑的扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parole as a boxing match: Lifers, prosecution, and the adversarial making of parole hearings Book Review: Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities? Purposes of Punishment in International Criminal Law by Florian Jeßberger and Julia Geneuss Book review: Parole on Probation: Parole Decision-Making, Public Opinion and Public Confidence by Robin Fitzgerald, Arie Freiberg, Shannon Dodd and Lorana Bartels Book review: Penality in the Underground: The IRA’s Pursuit of Informers by Ron Dudai Regulating criminal justice: The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in the inspection of probation in England and Wales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1