Risk of weight gain for specific antipsychotic drugs: a meta-analysis.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY NPJ Schizophrenia Pub Date : 2018-06-27 DOI:10.1038/s41537-018-0053-9
Jacob Spertus, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, Haley Abing, Sharon-Lise Normand
{"title":"Risk of weight gain for specific antipsychotic drugs: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Jacob Spertus,&nbsp;Marcela Horvitz-Lennon,&nbsp;Haley Abing,&nbsp;Sharon-Lise Normand","doi":"10.1038/s41537-018-0053-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with schizophrenia are at considerably higher risk of cardiometabolic morbidity than the general population. Second-generation antipsychotic drugs contribute to that risk partly through their weight gain effects, exacerbating an already high burden of disease. While standard 'as-randomized' analyses of clinical trials provide valuable information, they ignore adherence patterns across treatment arms, confounding estimates of realized treatment exposure on outcome. We assess the effect of specific second-generation antipsychotics on weight gain, defined as at least a 7% increase in weight from randomization, using a Bayesian hierarchical model network meta-analysis with individual patient level data. Our data consisted of 14 randomized clinical trials contributing 5923 subjects (mean age = 39 [SD = 12]) assessing various combinations of olanzapine (n = 533), paliperidone (n = 3482), risperidone (n = 540), and placebo (n = 1368). The median time from randomization to dropout or trial completion was 6 weeks (range: 0-60 weeks). The unadjusted probability of weight gain in the placebo group was 4.8% across trials. For each 10 g chlorpromazine equivalent dose increase in olanzapine, the odds of weight gain increased by 5 (95% credible interval: 1.4, 5.3); the effect of risperidone (odds ratio = 1.6 [0.25, 9.1]) was estimated with considerable uncertainty but no different from paliperidone (odds ratio = 1.3 [1.2, 1.5]).</p>","PeriodicalId":19328,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Schizophrenia","volume":"4 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/s41537-018-0053-9","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Schizophrenia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-018-0053-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

People with schizophrenia are at considerably higher risk of cardiometabolic morbidity than the general population. Second-generation antipsychotic drugs contribute to that risk partly through their weight gain effects, exacerbating an already high burden of disease. While standard 'as-randomized' analyses of clinical trials provide valuable information, they ignore adherence patterns across treatment arms, confounding estimates of realized treatment exposure on outcome. We assess the effect of specific second-generation antipsychotics on weight gain, defined as at least a 7% increase in weight from randomization, using a Bayesian hierarchical model network meta-analysis with individual patient level data. Our data consisted of 14 randomized clinical trials contributing 5923 subjects (mean age = 39 [SD = 12]) assessing various combinations of olanzapine (n = 533), paliperidone (n = 3482), risperidone (n = 540), and placebo (n = 1368). The median time from randomization to dropout or trial completion was 6 weeks (range: 0-60 weeks). The unadjusted probability of weight gain in the placebo group was 4.8% across trials. For each 10 g chlorpromazine equivalent dose increase in olanzapine, the odds of weight gain increased by 5 (95% credible interval: 1.4, 5.3); the effect of risperidone (odds ratio = 1.6 [0.25, 9.1]) was estimated with considerable uncertainty but no different from paliperidone (odds ratio = 1.3 [1.2, 1.5]).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特定抗精神病药物的体重增加风险:一项荟萃分析
精神分裂症患者患心脏代谢疾病的风险比一般人群高得多。第二代抗精神病药物导致这种风险的部分原因是它们的增重作用,加剧了本已很高的疾病负担。虽然临床试验的标准“随机”分析提供了有价值的信息,但它们忽略了治疗组的依从性模式,混淆了实现治疗暴露对结果的估计。我们评估了特定的第二代抗精神病药物对体重增加的影响,定义为随机化导致体重增加至少7%,使用贝叶斯分层模型网络对个体患者水平数据进行meta分析。我们的数据包括14项随机临床试验,共有5923名受试者(平均年龄= 39 [SD = 12]),评估了奥氮平(n = 533)、帕利培酮(n = 3482)、利培酮(n = 540)和安慰剂(n = 1368)的各种组合。从随机化到退出或试验完成的中位时间为6周(范围:0-60周)。在所有试验中,安慰剂组体重增加的未调整概率为4.8%。奥氮平每增加10g氯丙嗪当量剂量,体重增加的几率增加5(95%可信区间:1.4,5.3);利培酮(优势比= 1.6[0.25,9.1])的效果估计有相当大的不确定性,但与帕利哌酮(优势比= 1.3[1.2,1.5])没有区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Schizophrenia
NPJ Schizophrenia Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Schizophrenia is an international, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high-quality original papers and review articles relevant to all aspects of schizophrenia and psychosis, from molecular and basic research through environmental or social research, to translational and treatment-related topics. npj Schizophrenia publishes papers on the broad psychosis spectrum including affective psychosis, bipolar disorder, the at-risk mental state, psychotic symptoms, and overlap between psychotic and other disorders.
期刊最新文献
Reduction of intracortical inhibition (ICI) correlates with cognitive performance and psychopathology symptoms in schizophrenia Multivariate associations between neuroanatomy and cognition in unmedicated and medicated individuals with schizophrenia RNA-sequencing suggests extracellular matrix and vasculature dysregulation could impair neurogenesis in schizophrenia cases with elevated inflammation Socioeconomic status, personality, and major mental disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study Differences in schizophrenia treatments by race and ethnicity—analysis of electronic health records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1