Toward a standard assembly of linear graphs.

Evan H Dart, Keith C Radley
{"title":"Toward a standard assembly of linear graphs.","authors":"Evan H Dart,&nbsp;Keith C Radley","doi":"10.1037/spq0000269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-case data are frequently used in school psychology. In research, single-case designs allow experimenters to provide rigorous demonstrations of treatment effects on a smaller scale and with more precise measurement than traditional group experimental design. In practice, single-case data are used to evaluate the effects of school-based services to make decisions at the individual level within a multitiered system of support (MTSS). School psychology and related fields (e.g., special education) have worked to increase the rigor of single-case data by developing standards for single-case experimental design and developing robust single-case effect size statistics; however, in practice, single-case data are often collected with less experimental rigor and evaluated using visual analysis of a linear graph as opposed to quantitative effect sizes. This is concerning, as an emerging body of literature suggests that simple elements of the graphical display (e.g., ordinate axis scaling, ratio of X to Y axis length) can have a profound impact on effect size judgments made by visual analysts. Currently, there are no standards guiding the construction of linear graphs used to display single-case data. The purpose of this paper is to advance the perspective that our field must develop and adopt standards of linear graph construction or risk inaccurate decisions within a MTSS framework. (PsycINFO Database Record</p>","PeriodicalId":88124,"journal":{"name":"School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association","volume":"33 3","pages":"350-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Single-case data are frequently used in school psychology. In research, single-case designs allow experimenters to provide rigorous demonstrations of treatment effects on a smaller scale and with more precise measurement than traditional group experimental design. In practice, single-case data are used to evaluate the effects of school-based services to make decisions at the individual level within a multitiered system of support (MTSS). School psychology and related fields (e.g., special education) have worked to increase the rigor of single-case data by developing standards for single-case experimental design and developing robust single-case effect size statistics; however, in practice, single-case data are often collected with less experimental rigor and evaluated using visual analysis of a linear graph as opposed to quantitative effect sizes. This is concerning, as an emerging body of literature suggests that simple elements of the graphical display (e.g., ordinate axis scaling, ratio of X to Y axis length) can have a profound impact on effect size judgments made by visual analysts. Currently, there are no standards guiding the construction of linear graphs used to display single-case data. The purpose of this paper is to advance the perspective that our field must develop and adopt standards of linear graph construction or risk inaccurate decisions within a MTSS framework. (PsycINFO Database Record

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
趋向于线性图的标准集合。
学校心理学经常使用个案数据。在研究中,与传统的群体实验设计相比,单案例设计允许实验者以更小的规模和更精确的测量提供治疗效果的严格演示。在实践中,单个案例数据被用于评估基于学校的服务在多层支持系统(MTSS)中在个人层面做出决策的效果。学校心理学和相关领域(例如,特殊教育)通过制定单一案例实验设计标准和制定可靠的单一案例效应大小统计数据,努力提高单一案例数据的严谨性;然而,在实践中,单例数据的收集往往缺乏实验严谨性,并使用线性图的可视化分析来评估,而不是定量效应大小。这一点令人担忧,因为越来越多的文献表明,图形显示的简单元素(例如,纵坐标缩放,X轴与Y轴长度的比例)会对视觉分析人员做出的效应大小判断产生深远影响。目前,还没有标准指导用于显示单一情况数据的线性图的构造。本文的目的是提出一个观点,即我们的领域必须开发和采用线性图构建标准,否则就有可能在MTSS框架内做出不准确的决策。(PsycINFO数据库记录
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teacher and student race as a predictor for negative feedback during instruction. Fostering youth self-efficacy to address transgender and racial diversity issues: The role of gay-straight alliances. The big two personality traits and adolescents' complete mental health: The mediation role of perceived school stress. Examining the stability of social, emotional, and behavioral risk status: Implications for screening frequency. Developing a direct rating behavior scale for depression in middle school students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1