High Frequency of Extractable Nuclear Autoantibodies in Wheat-Related Disorders.

IF 3.4 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomarker Insights Pub Date : 2018-06-18 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1177271918782893
Yuanyuan Yang, Karthik Krishna, Payal Deshpande, Vinodh Ranganathan, Vasanth Jayaraman, Tianhao Wang, Kang Bei, Hari Krishnamurthy
{"title":"High Frequency of Extractable Nuclear Autoantibodies in Wheat-Related Disorders.","authors":"Yuanyuan Yang,&nbsp;Karthik Krishna,&nbsp;Payal Deshpande,&nbsp;Vinodh Ranganathan,&nbsp;Vasanth Jayaraman,&nbsp;Tianhao Wang,&nbsp;Kang Bei,&nbsp;Hari Krishnamurthy","doi":"10.1177/1177271918782893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There has been broad interest to explore the presence of autoimmunity among wheat-sensitive individuals, but neither the pathogenesis nor the relevance has been established. In this study, we evaluated the frequencies and levels of autoantibodies, which are important biomarkers of autoimmunity, in subjects with wheat-related disorders and controls. Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and the specific ones against extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 713 subjects who showed symptoms related to wheat ingestion were addressed to Vibrant America Clinical Laboratory from December 2015 to November 2017. Serum samples were collected from all subjects and tested with a wheat protein antibody panel (IgG and IgA to 18 proteins at the peptide level) and an autoantibody panel (ANA by immunofluorescence analysis and 10 ENA antibodies). Retrospective analysis was completed using de-identified clinical data and test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the retrospective analysis, 38 (5%) were seropositive in a Celiac Disease panel, 491 (83%) were seropositive in a wheat protein antibody panel \"Wheat Zoomer,\" and 84 (12%) were seronegative in both panels. Anti-nuclear antibodies were detected in similar portions of the celiac disease subjects (13%), the Wheat Zoomer-positive subjects (12%), and seronegative controls (15%), which is also very close to the reported occurrence of ANA positivity (15%) in the healthy population. The prevalence of anti-ENA was reported to be less than 2% in the general population; however, our study found it to be much higher in the celiac disease subjects (29%) and the wheat-sensitive subjects (27%), compared with a smaller proportion of seronegative controls (19%). The prevalence of anti-histone was especially prominent among the celiac disease subjects (73%) and the Wheat Zoomer-positive subjects (60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High proportions of wheat-related disease subjects carry ENA antibodies that are important specific biomarkers of autoimmunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47060,"journal":{"name":"Biomarker Insights","volume":"13 ","pages":"1177271918782893"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1177271918782893","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarker Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1177271918782893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and aims: There has been broad interest to explore the presence of autoimmunity among wheat-sensitive individuals, but neither the pathogenesis nor the relevance has been established. In this study, we evaluated the frequencies and levels of autoantibodies, which are important biomarkers of autoimmunity, in subjects with wheat-related disorders and controls. Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and the specific ones against extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) were investigated.

Methods: A total of 713 subjects who showed symptoms related to wheat ingestion were addressed to Vibrant America Clinical Laboratory from December 2015 to November 2017. Serum samples were collected from all subjects and tested with a wheat protein antibody panel (IgG and IgA to 18 proteins at the peptide level) and an autoantibody panel (ANA by immunofluorescence analysis and 10 ENA antibodies). Retrospective analysis was completed using de-identified clinical data and test results.

Results: In the retrospective analysis, 38 (5%) were seropositive in a Celiac Disease panel, 491 (83%) were seropositive in a wheat protein antibody panel "Wheat Zoomer," and 84 (12%) were seronegative in both panels. Anti-nuclear antibodies were detected in similar portions of the celiac disease subjects (13%), the Wheat Zoomer-positive subjects (12%), and seronegative controls (15%), which is also very close to the reported occurrence of ANA positivity (15%) in the healthy population. The prevalence of anti-ENA was reported to be less than 2% in the general population; however, our study found it to be much higher in the celiac disease subjects (29%) and the wheat-sensitive subjects (27%), compared with a smaller proportion of seronegative controls (19%). The prevalence of anti-histone was especially prominent among the celiac disease subjects (73%) and the Wheat Zoomer-positive subjects (60%).

Conclusions: High proportions of wheat-related disease subjects carry ENA antibodies that are important specific biomarkers of autoimmunity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小麦相关疾病可提取核自身抗体的高频率研究。
背景和目的:在小麦敏感个体中探索自身免疫的存在已经引起了广泛的兴趣,但其发病机制和相关性尚未确定。在这项研究中,我们评估了小麦相关疾病和对照组中自身抗体的频率和水平,这是自身免疫的重要生物标志物。研究了抗核抗体(ANA)和抗可提取核抗原(ENA)的特异性抗体。方法:2015年12月至2017年11月,共有713名出现小麦摄入相关症状的受试者前往美国活力临床实验室。收集所有受试者的血清样本,用小麦蛋白抗体(IgG和IgA至18个蛋白在肽水平)和自身抗体(免疫荧光分析ANA和10个ENA抗体)进行检测。回顾性分析使用去识别的临床资料和测试结果完成。结果:在回顾性分析中,38人(5%)在乳糜泻组中呈血清阳性,491人(83%)在小麦蛋白抗体组“wheat Zoomer”中呈血清阳性,84人(12%)在两组中均呈血清阴性。在乳糜泻受试者(13%)、Wheat zoomer阳性受试者(12%)和血清阴性对照(15%)中检测到类似部分的抗核抗体,这也与报道的健康人群中ANA阳性的发生率(15%)非常接近。据报道,在一般人群中,抗ena的患病率低于2%;然而,我们的研究发现,在乳糜泻受试者(29%)和小麦敏感受试者(27%)中,这一比例要高得多,而血清阴性对照组的比例较小(19%)。抗组蛋白的患病率在乳糜泻患者(73%)和Wheat zoomer阳性患者(60%)中尤为突出。结论:高比例的小麦相关疾病患者携带ENA抗体,这是自身免疫的重要特异性生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarker Insights
Biomarker Insights MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: An open access, peer reviewed electronic journal that covers all aspects of biomarker research and clinical applications.
期刊最新文献
Procalcitonin Guided Antibiotic Stewardship. Bladder Cancer Treatments in the Age of Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Potential Radiosensitivity Biomarkers. Decreased Serum Insulin Receptor Messenger RNA Level in H. pylori IgG Seropositive Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Systematic Analysis and Insights Into the Mutation Spectrum and Ethnic Differences in ATP7B Mutations Associated With Wilson Disease. The Chromosome Passenger Complex (CPC) Components and Its Associated Pathways Are Promising Candidates to Differentiate Between Normosensitive and Radiosensitive ATM-Mutated Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1