Postpartum Contraception Use Rates of Patients Participating in the Centering Pregnancy Model of Care Versus Traditional Obstetrical Care.

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine 生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Julie Z DeCesare, Dawn Hannah, Raid Amin
{"title":"Postpartum Contraception Use Rates of Patients Participating in the Centering Pregnancy Model of Care Versus Traditional Obstetrical Care.","authors":"Julie Z DeCesare,&nbsp;Dawn Hannah,&nbsp;Raid Amin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To examine whether postpartum contraceptive rates are higher in the CenteringPregnancy population as compared to patients who choose to participate in traditional prenatal care. Centering Pregnancy is a model of obstetrical care that allows for enhanced contraceptive education.\n\nSTUDY DESIGN: All patients who were delivered within the Florida State University College of Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology residency from October 31, 2010, to October 31, 2011, were included in the study. A retrospective chart review was undertaken to compare the postpartum contraceptive use of patients in traditional obstetric care versus patients in CenteringPregnancy.\n\nRESULTS: A total of 472 obstetrical charts were reviewed, with 350 women participating in traditional care and 122 women in CenteringPregnancy. Using Fisher's exact test, the 2 groups' postpartum contraceptive use was compared. Analysis revealed that 57.4% of CenteringPregnancy patients returned for postpartum contraception, vs. 37.7% of traditional prenatal care patients. Furthermore, 24.5% of CenteringPregnancy patients chose long-acting reversible contraception as compared to only 8.28% of traditional patients.\n\nCONCLUSION: Centering Pregnancy leads to an increase in use of postpartum contraception when compared to traditional prenatal care. Long-acting reversible contraceptive usage rates were also significantly higher among CenteringPregnancy patients and were the most frequently chosen method of family planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"45-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether postpartum contraceptive rates are higher in the CenteringPregnancy population as compared to patients who choose to participate in traditional prenatal care. Centering Pregnancy is a model of obstetrical care that allows for enhanced contraceptive education. STUDY DESIGN: All patients who were delivered within the Florida State University College of Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology residency from October 31, 2010, to October 31, 2011, were included in the study. A retrospective chart review was undertaken to compare the postpartum contraceptive use of patients in traditional obstetric care versus patients in CenteringPregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 472 obstetrical charts were reviewed, with 350 women participating in traditional care and 122 women in CenteringPregnancy. Using Fisher's exact test, the 2 groups' postpartum contraceptive use was compared. Analysis revealed that 57.4% of CenteringPregnancy patients returned for postpartum contraception, vs. 37.7% of traditional prenatal care patients. Furthermore, 24.5% of CenteringPregnancy patients chose long-acting reversible contraception as compared to only 8.28% of traditional patients. CONCLUSION: Centering Pregnancy leads to an increase in use of postpartum contraception when compared to traditional prenatal care. Long-acting reversible contraceptive usage rates were also significantly higher among CenteringPregnancy patients and were the most frequently chosen method of family planning.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与以妊娠为中心的护理模式与传统产科护理的产后避孕药具使用率
目的:探讨与选择参加传统产前护理的患者相比,中心妊娠人群的产后避孕率是否更高。以怀孕为中心是一种产科护理模式,可以加强避孕教育。研究设计:所有于2010年10月31日至2011年10月31日在佛罗里达州立大学医学院妇产科住院分娩的患者均纳入研究。回顾性分析了传统产科护理与中心妊娠患者的产后避孕药使用情况。结果:共回顾了472张产科图表,其中350名妇女参加了传统护理,122名妇女参加了中心妊娠。采用Fisher精确检验比较两组产后避孕药使用情况。分析显示,57.4%的CenteringPregnancy患者返回进行产后避孕,而传统产前护理患者的这一比例为37.7%。此外,24.5%的CenteringPregnancy患者选择长效可逆避孕,而传统患者只有8.28%。结论:与传统的产前护理相比,以妊娠为中心可增加产后避孕药具的使用。长效可逆避孕药的使用率在中心妊娠患者中也明显较高,是最常用的计划生育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
期刊最新文献
Role of Capecitabine in the Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Drug for Two Settings. Comparison of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Using a Ring-Shaped Loop Versus a Right-Angled Triangular Loop. Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Common and Distinct Signatures Underlying Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancers. Analysis of Related Causes for No Embryos Transferred and Corresponding Coping Measures in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cesarean Section Rates and Clinical Indications at a Large North African Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1