Patient Perspectives of Obstetrician-Gynecologists as Primary Care Providers.

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine 生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Sara Mazzoni, Sarah Brewer, Josh Durfee, Jennifer Pyrzanowski, Juliana Barnard, Amanda F Dempsey, Sean T O'Leary
{"title":"Patient Perspectives of Obstetrician-Gynecologists as Primary Care Providers.","authors":"Sara Mazzoni,&nbsp;Sarah Brewer,&nbsp;Josh Durfee,&nbsp;Jennifer Pyrzanowski,&nbsp;Juliana Barnard,&nbsp;Amanda F Dempsey,&nbsp;Sean T O'Leary","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine women�s perceptions of their obstetrician/gynecologist (ob-gyn) as primary care provider (PCP) and comfort in receiving primary care services in an ob-gyn setting.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Survey regarding women�s use of their ob-gyn provider as a PCP, their desire and comfort in receiving primary care services from them, and their perceptions of their ob-gyn�s delivery of primary care. Associations were assessed between use of an ob-gyn as PCP and various demographic and attitudinal factors, as well as patients� perceptions of primary care performance</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 48% (1,404/2,916). Overall, the majority of participants responded that routine primary care services are available at their ob-gyn office and that they were comfortable receiving those services from their ob-gyn. Twenty percent of respondents considered their ob-gyn as their PCP, 52% considered another provider their PCP, and 28% of women did not identify a PCP. Women who were pregnant, mothers of newborns, and patients without a chronic health condition were more likely to identify their ob-gyn as their PCP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of women consider their ob-gyn their primary care provider and do not visit another provider regularly. While ob-gyns may not consider themselves as PCPs, they are often perceived as such by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine women�s perceptions of their obstetrician/gynecologist (ob-gyn) as primary care provider (PCP) and comfort in receiving primary care services in an ob-gyn setting.

Study design: Survey regarding women�s use of their ob-gyn provider as a PCP, their desire and comfort in receiving primary care services from them, and their perceptions of their ob-gyn�s delivery of primary care. Associations were assessed between use of an ob-gyn as PCP and various demographic and attitudinal factors, as well as patients� perceptions of primary care performance

Results: The response rate was 48% (1,404/2,916). Overall, the majority of participants responded that routine primary care services are available at their ob-gyn office and that they were comfortable receiving those services from their ob-gyn. Twenty percent of respondents considered their ob-gyn as their PCP, 52% considered another provider their PCP, and 28% of women did not identify a PCP. Women who were pregnant, mothers of newborns, and patients without a chronic health condition were more likely to identify their ob-gyn as their PCP.

Conclusion: A substantial proportion of women consider their ob-gyn their primary care provider and do not visit another provider regularly. While ob-gyns may not consider themselves as PCPs, they are often perceived as such by patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为初级保健提供者的妇产科医生的患者观点。
目的:调查妇女对其产科医生/妇科医生(ob-gyn)作为初级保健提供者(PCP)的看法以及在妇产科环境中接受初级保健服务的舒适度。研究设计:调查妇女使用其妇产科医生作为PCP的情况,她们从他们那里接受初级保健服务的愿望和舒适度,以及她们对其妇产科医生提供初级保健服务的看法。评估了使用妇产科医生作为PCP与各种人口统计学和态度因素以及患者对初级保健表现的看法之间的关系。结果:反应率为48%(1,404/2,916)。总体而言,大多数参与者回答说,他们的妇产科办公室可以提供常规的初级保健服务,并且他们从妇产科那里接受这些服务感到舒适。20%的受访者认为他们的妇产科医生是他们的PCP, 52%的人认为其他提供者是他们的PCP, 28%的女性没有确定PCP。孕妇、新生儿的母亲和没有慢性疾病的患者更有可能将自己的妇产科医生视为自己的PCP。结论:相当大比例的妇女认为她们的妇产科医生是她们的初级保健提供者,并且不定期去看其他提供者。虽然妇产科医生可能不认为自己是pcp,但他们经常被患者视为pcp。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
期刊最新文献
Role of Capecitabine in the Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Drug for Two Settings. Comparison of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Using a Ring-Shaped Loop Versus a Right-Angled Triangular Loop. Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Common and Distinct Signatures Underlying Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancers. Analysis of Related Causes for No Embryos Transferred and Corresponding Coping Measures in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cesarean Section Rates and Clinical Indications at a Large North African Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1