Comparisons of the Health Benefits of Strength Training, Aqua-Fitness, and Aerobic Exercise for the Elderly.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2018-06-19 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/5230971
Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez, Anxela Soto-Rodríguez, Ignacio Pérez-Ribao, José L García-Soidán
{"title":"Comparisons of the Health Benefits of Strength Training, Aqua-Fitness, and Aerobic Exercise for the Elderly.","authors":"Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Anxela Soto-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Ignacio Pérez-Ribao,&nbsp;José L García-Soidán","doi":"10.1155/2018/5230971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare strength training, aqua-fitness, and aerobic exercise programs to discern the differences in the benefits achieved by each of the activities in older people.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Double-blind randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Controlled clinical environment.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>108 people: 54 female paired with a male of the same age (average age of 65.5 ± 5.6 years).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three exercise programs (aqua-fitness, aerobic exercise, and strength training) for six months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Body Mass Index, Senior Fitness Test (which evaluated functional fitness), and the SF-12 Health Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men showed greater positive changes in the aerobic exercise group for general self-perceived mental health, leg strength, and flexibility of legs and arms. The largest improvements in overall self-perceived physical health and upper limb strength were in the men of the strength training group. The women participants in the strength training group obtained greater benefits, especially in self-perceived mental and physical health and in the strength of the four limbs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To maximise benefits, older people, in general, may want to consider participating in aerobic activity. Furthermore, older women would benefit greatly, both emotionally and physically, from exercise that includes strength training.</p>","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/5230971","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5230971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Objective: To compare strength training, aqua-fitness, and aerobic exercise programs to discern the differences in the benefits achieved by each of the activities in older people.

Design: Double-blind randomized trial.

Setting: Controlled clinical environment.

Participants: 108 people: 54 female paired with a male of the same age (average age of 65.5 ± 5.6 years).

Interventions: Three exercise programs (aqua-fitness, aerobic exercise, and strength training) for six months.

Main outcome measures: Body Mass Index, Senior Fitness Test (which evaluated functional fitness), and the SF-12 Health Survey.

Results: Men showed greater positive changes in the aerobic exercise group for general self-perceived mental health, leg strength, and flexibility of legs and arms. The largest improvements in overall self-perceived physical health and upper limb strength were in the men of the strength training group. The women participants in the strength training group obtained greater benefits, especially in self-perceived mental and physical health and in the strength of the four limbs.

Conclusions: To maximise benefits, older people, in general, may want to consider participating in aerobic activity. Furthermore, older women would benefit greatly, both emotionally and physically, from exercise that includes strength training.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人力量训练、水中健身和有氧运动对健康益处的比较。
目的:比较力量训练、水中健身和有氧运动项目,以辨别老年人每一种活动所获得的益处的差异。设计:双盲随机试验。设置:受控临床环境。参与者:108人:女性54人,男性1人,年龄相同(平均年龄65.5±5.6岁)。干预:三个运动项目(水中健身、有氧运动和力量训练),为期六个月。主要结果测量:身体质量指数、老年人健康测试(评估功能健康)和SF-12健康调查。结果:有氧运动组的男性在总体自我感知的心理健康、腿部力量、腿和手臂的柔韧性方面表现出更大的积极变化。在整体自我感觉的身体健康和上肢力量方面,力量训练组的男性进步最大。力量训练组的女性参与者获得了更大的好处,特别是在自我认知的身心健康和四肢力量方面。结论:为了获得最大的益处,一般来说,老年人可能需要考虑参加有氧运动。此外,老年妇女将从包括力量训练在内的锻炼中受益匪浅,无论是在情感上还是身体上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Physical Health and Socioeconomic Status in Ambulatory Adults With Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Comparing the Physiological Responses to the 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test. Virtual Reality Technology for Physical and Cognitive Function Rehabilitation in People With Multiple Sclerosis. Categories of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale Activities in Chronic Neck Pain and Their Relationship to the Neck Disability Index. The NewGait Rehabilitative Device Corrects Gait Deviations in Individuals With Foot Drop.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1