A Clinical Trial with Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Attentional Bias Modification in Alcohol-Dependent Patients.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-03 DOI:10.1111/acer.13841
Tess E den Uyl, Thomas E Gladwin, Johannes Lindenmeyer, Reinout W Wiers
{"title":"A Clinical Trial with Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Attentional Bias Modification in Alcohol-Dependent Patients.","authors":"Tess E den Uyl,&nbsp;Thomas E Gladwin,&nbsp;Johannes Lindenmeyer,&nbsp;Reinout W Wiers","doi":"10.1111/acer.13841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modifying attentional processes with attentional bias modification (ABM) might be a relevant add-on to treatment in addiction. This study investigated whether influencing cortical plasticity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could increase training effects. tDCS could also help alcohol-dependent patients to overcome craving and reduce relapse, independent of training. These approaches were combined to investigate effects in the treatment of alcoholism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-eight patients (analytical sample = 83) were randomly assigned to 4 groups in a 2-by-2 factorial design. Patients received 4 sessions of ABM (control or real training) combined with 2 mA tDCS (active: 20 minutes or sham: 30 seconds) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Alcohol bias and craving were assessed, and treatment outcome was measured as relapse after 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attentional bias scores indicated that during the training only the group with active tDCS and real ABM displayed an overall avoidance bias (p < 0.05). From pre- to postassessment, there were no main or interaction effects of tDCS and ABM on the bias scores, craving, or relapse (p > 0.2). However, effects on relapse after active tDCS were in the expected direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no evidence of a beneficial effect of tDCS or ABM or the combination. Whether the absence of effect was due to issues with the outcome measurements (e.g., lack of craving, high dropout, and unreliable measurements) or aspects of the intervention should be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":7410,"journal":{"name":"Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research","volume":"42 10","pages":"1961-1969"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/acer.13841","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Background: Modifying attentional processes with attentional bias modification (ABM) might be a relevant add-on to treatment in addiction. This study investigated whether influencing cortical plasticity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could increase training effects. tDCS could also help alcohol-dependent patients to overcome craving and reduce relapse, independent of training. These approaches were combined to investigate effects in the treatment of alcoholism.

Methods: Ninety-eight patients (analytical sample = 83) were randomly assigned to 4 groups in a 2-by-2 factorial design. Patients received 4 sessions of ABM (control or real training) combined with 2 mA tDCS (active: 20 minutes or sham: 30 seconds) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Alcohol bias and craving were assessed, and treatment outcome was measured as relapse after 1 year.

Results: Attentional bias scores indicated that during the training only the group with active tDCS and real ABM displayed an overall avoidance bias (p < 0.05). From pre- to postassessment, there were no main or interaction effects of tDCS and ABM on the bias scores, craving, or relapse (p > 0.2). However, effects on relapse after active tDCS were in the expected direction.

Conclusions: There was no evidence of a beneficial effect of tDCS or ABM or the combination. Whether the absence of effect was due to issues with the outcome measurements (e.g., lack of craving, high dropout, and unreliable measurements) or aspects of the intervention should be further investigated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精依赖患者经颅直流电刺激和注意偏差修正联合应用的临床试验。
背景:用注意偏差修正(ABM)来修正注意过程可能是成瘾治疗的一个相关附加因素。本研究探讨了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对皮层可塑性的影响是否可以提高训练效果。tDCS还可以帮助酒精依赖患者克服渴望,减少复发,而不依赖训练。将这些方法结合起来研究酒精中毒的治疗效果。方法:98名患者(分析样本=83)按2乘2的析因设计随机分为4组。患者在左背外侧前额叶皮层接受4次ABM(对照或真实训练)联合2mA tDCS(活动:20分钟或假:30秒)。对酒精偏好和渴求进行评估,并将治疗结果衡量为1年后复发。结果:注意偏倚评分显示,在训练过程中,只有主动tDCS和真正ABM的组表现出整体回避偏倚(p 0.2)。然而,主动tDCS对复发的影响是预期的。结论:没有证据表明tDCS或ABM或其组合具有有益效果。没有效果是由于结果测量的问题(例如,缺乏渴望、高辍学率和不可靠的测量)还是干预的各个方面,都应该进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
219
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research''s scope spans animal and human clinical research, epidemiological, experimental, policy, and historical research relating to any aspect of alcohol abuse, dependence, or alcoholism. This journal uses a multi-disciplinary approach in its scope of alcoholism, its causes, clinical and animal effect, consequences, patterns, treatments and recovery, predictors and prevention.
期刊最新文献
Penile Cellulitis Related to Mpox Genital Lesions. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of a web-based computer-tailored intervention for prevention of binge drinking among Spanish adolescents. NOP receptor antagonists decrease alcohol drinking in the dark in C57BL/6J mice. Epigenome-wide DNA Methylation Association Analysis Identified Novel Loci in Peripheral Cells for Alcohol Consumption among European American Male Veterans. Cerebellar hypermetabolism in alcohol use disorder: compensatory mechanism or maladaptive plasticity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1