Contribution of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies.
IF 0.2 4区 医学Q4 Medicine生殖医学杂志Pub Date : 2017-05-01
Jae Eun Shin, Jong Chul Shin, Sa Jin Kim, Young Lee, Soo Ah Im, In Yang Park
{"title":"Contribution of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies.","authors":"Jae Eun Shin, Jong Chul Shin, Sa Jin Kim, Young Lee, Soo Ah Im, In Yang Park","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contributes to ultrasound for the evaluation of fetal central nervous system (CNS) anomalies. The secondary objective was to investigate whether MRI adds more information regarding the evaluation of specific pathologies or conditions.\n\nSTUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively compared fetal MRI findings with ultrasound findings in CNS anomalies with respect to certain pathologic groups. Additionally, we evaluated diagnostic accuracy by comparing fetal MRI and ultrasound findings with postnatal findings.\n\nRESULTS: A total of 34 patients had 40 provisional diagnoses by fetal ultrasound, and of those patients 14 had a provisional diagnosis of ventriculomegaly and 14 had a provisional diagnosis of cerebellar or posterior fossa anomalies. MRI added to or changed the diagnosis in 52.5% of the patients with CNS abnormalities. The contribution rate in ventriculomegaly was 71.4%, and MRI changed the diagnosis in all indefinite diagnoses by ultrasound. Additionally, of the 15 patients with postnatal findings, there were no cases in which only the ultrasound findings were correct, but the MRI findings were incorrect.\n\nCONCLUSION: MRI contributes to ultrasound in the diagnosis of CNS anomalies. Cases of indefinite diagnosis and ventriculomegaly by ultrasound had greater benefit from MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 5-6","pages":"295-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contributes to ultrasound for the evaluation of fetal central nervous system (CNS) anomalies. The secondary objective was to investigate whether MRI adds more information regarding the evaluation of specific pathologies or conditions.
STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively compared fetal MRI findings with ultrasound findings in CNS anomalies with respect to certain pathologic groups. Additionally, we evaluated diagnostic accuracy by comparing fetal MRI and ultrasound findings with postnatal findings.
RESULTS: A total of 34 patients had 40 provisional diagnoses by fetal ultrasound, and of those patients 14 had a provisional diagnosis of ventriculomegaly and 14 had a provisional diagnosis of cerebellar or posterior fossa anomalies. MRI added to or changed the diagnosis in 52.5% of the patients with CNS abnormalities. The contribution rate in ventriculomegaly was 71.4%, and MRI changed the diagnosis in all indefinite diagnoses by ultrasound. Additionally, of the 15 patients with postnatal findings, there were no cases in which only the ultrasound findings were correct, but the MRI findings were incorrect.
CONCLUSION: MRI contributes to ultrasound in the diagnosis of CNS anomalies. Cases of indefinite diagnosis and ventriculomegaly by ultrasound had greater benefit from MRI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.