Wealthy, urban, educated. Who is represented in population surveys of women's menstrual hygiene management?

Julie Hennegan, Alexandra K Shannon, Kellogg J Schwab
{"title":"Wealthy, urban, educated. Who is represented in population surveys of women's menstrual hygiene management?","authors":"Julie Hennegan, Alexandra K Shannon, Kellogg J Schwab","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1484220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inadequate menstrual hygiene presents a barrier to women's dignity and health. Recent attention to this marginalised challenge has resulted in the first national assessments of menstrual practices. Intuitively, surveys require women to have had a recent menses to be eligible. This study seeks to determine if there are demographic differences between women who are eligible and ineligible to answer questions about their menstrual hygiene during these assessments. Secondary analyses were undertaken on nationally or state representative data collected by the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 survey programme across eight countries (Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Niger, Nigeria, and Uganda). Female respondents were included in the study and compared on whether they had a menstrual period within the past three months and thus were eligible to answer questions regarding menstrual practices. On average, 29% of surveyed women across samples were ineligible to be asked menstrual hygiene questions. Higher levels of education, wealth, and urban residence were associated with higher odds of eligibility. Young and unmarried women were also more likely to be eligible. Demographic differences between eligible and ineligible women were consistent across all countries. Wealthy, urban, and educated women are more likely to be eligible to answer survey questions about menstrual hygiene. While population surveys may be representative of menstruating women, proportions of menstrual hygiene practices reported underrepresent the experiences of more vulnerable groups. These groups are likely to have greater struggles with menstrual hygiene when they are menstruating.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 52","pages":"1484220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/81/RHM-26-52-081.PMC7745112.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1484220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inadequate menstrual hygiene presents a barrier to women's dignity and health. Recent attention to this marginalised challenge has resulted in the first national assessments of menstrual practices. Intuitively, surveys require women to have had a recent menses to be eligible. This study seeks to determine if there are demographic differences between women who are eligible and ineligible to answer questions about their menstrual hygiene during these assessments. Secondary analyses were undertaken on nationally or state representative data collected by the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 survey programme across eight countries (Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Niger, Nigeria, and Uganda). Female respondents were included in the study and compared on whether they had a menstrual period within the past three months and thus were eligible to answer questions regarding menstrual practices. On average, 29% of surveyed women across samples were ineligible to be asked menstrual hygiene questions. Higher levels of education, wealth, and urban residence were associated with higher odds of eligibility. Young and unmarried women were also more likely to be eligible. Demographic differences between eligible and ineligible women were consistent across all countries. Wealthy, urban, and educated women are more likely to be eligible to answer survey questions about menstrual hygiene. While population surveys may be representative of menstruating women, proportions of menstrual hygiene practices reported underrepresent the experiences of more vulnerable groups. These groups are likely to have greater struggles with menstrual hygiene when they are menstruating.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富裕、城市、受过教育。在妇女经期卫生管理的人口调查中,哪些人有代表性?
经期卫生不足是妇女尊严和健康的障碍。最近,对这一边缘化挑战的关注促成了首次全国性月经习惯评估。直观地说,调查要求妇女最近来过一次月经才有资格参加。本研究旨在确定在这些评估中,有资格和无资格回答有关月经卫生问题的妇女之间是否存在人口统计学差异。本研究对 "2020 年绩效监测与问责 "调查计划在八个国家(布基纳法索、埃塞俄比亚、加纳、印度、肯尼亚、尼日尔、尼日利亚和乌干达)收集的具有国家或州代表性的数据进行了二次分析。女性受访者被纳入研究范围,并根据她们在过去三个月内是否来过月经,从而有资格回答有关月经做法的问题进行比较。在所有样本中,平均有 29% 的受访女性没有资格回答有关经期卫生的问题。教育程度、财富和城市居住水平越高,符合条件的几率越大。年轻和未婚女性也更有可能符合条件。符合条件和不符合条件的妇女之间的人口统计学差异在所有国家都是一致的。富裕、城市和受过教育的女性更有可能有资格回答有关月经卫生的调查问题。虽然人口调查可能代表了月经期妇女的情况,但所报告的月经期卫生习惯比例并不能充分反映更多弱势群体的经历。这些群体在月经期间可能会在经期卫生方面遇到更多困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters ( SRHM) promotes sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) globally through its journal and ''more than a journal'' activities. The Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters (SRHM) journal, formerly Reproductive Health Matters (RHM), is a peer-reviewed, international journal that explores emerging, neglected and marginalised topics and themes across the field of sexual and reproductive health and rights. It aims to publish original, relevant, and contemporary research, particularly from a feminist perspective, that can help inform the development of policies, laws and services to fulfil the rights and meet the sexual and reproductive health needs of people of all ages, gender identities and sexual orientations. SRHM publishes work that engages with fundamental dilemmas and debates in SRHR, highlighting multiple perspectives, acknowledging differences, and searching for new forms of consensus. SRHM strongly encourages research that explores experiences, values, information and issues from the point of view of those whose lives are affected. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based violence, young people, gender, sexuality and sexual rights.
期刊最新文献
4 Code Work: RAI-MDS, Measurement, Quality, and Work Organization in Long-Term Care Facilities in Ontario 1 Introduction 2 The Dematerialization of Fundamental Nursing Care in an Era of Managerial Reform 11 Seeking Disability Politics in Disability and Health-Related Non-profit Organizations 13 Nail Salons, Toxics, and Health: Organizing for a Better Work Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1