Jungho Shin MD, PhD , Seongyup Yeo MD , Jun Young Hong MD , Jin Ho Hwang MD, PhD , Su Hyun Kim MD, PhD
{"title":"Impact of intradialytic blood pressure changes on cardiovascular outcomes is independent of the volume status of maintenance hemodialysis patients","authors":"Jungho Shin MD, PhD , Seongyup Yeo MD , Jun Young Hong MD , Jin Ho Hwang MD, PhD , Su Hyun Kim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jash.2018.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Intradialytic systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes are related to the volume status; however, whether SBP change impacts on </span>adverse outcomes<span> depends on the volume status remains uncertain. We retrospectively investigated the relationship among intradialytic changes in SBP, cardiovascular outcomes, and volume status in maintenance hemodialysis<span> patients. We determined SBP changes (ΔSBP) as postdialysis SBP minus predialysis SBP and volume status as the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) using bioelectrical impedance analysis. There were 82 (60.3%) with ΔSBP −20 to 10 mm Hg, 21 (15.4%) with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg, and 33 (24.3%) with ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg, and they were followed up for a median of 34 months. Cardiovascular events more frequently occurred in the patients with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg and ≥ 10 mm Hg (hazard ratio: 2.3 and 3.0; </span></span></span><em>P</em> = .062 and .006); these associations persisted even after adjusting for postdialysis ECW/TBW (<em>P</em><span> = .056 and .028). Moreover, ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg was associated with increased cardiovascular mortalities independent of postdialysis ECW/TBW (</span><em>P</em> = .043). There was an independent association of volume status between considerable SBP decrease or increase during hemodialysis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Besides appropriate volume control, other factors related to BP changes during hemodialysis must be investigated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","volume":"12 11","pages":"Pages 779-788"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jash.2018.06.011","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933171118301906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Intradialytic systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes are related to the volume status; however, whether SBP change impacts on adverse outcomes depends on the volume status remains uncertain. We retrospectively investigated the relationship among intradialytic changes in SBP, cardiovascular outcomes, and volume status in maintenance hemodialysis patients. We determined SBP changes (ΔSBP) as postdialysis SBP minus predialysis SBP and volume status as the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) using bioelectrical impedance analysis. There were 82 (60.3%) with ΔSBP −20 to 10 mm Hg, 21 (15.4%) with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg, and 33 (24.3%) with ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg, and they were followed up for a median of 34 months. Cardiovascular events more frequently occurred in the patients with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg and ≥ 10 mm Hg (hazard ratio: 2.3 and 3.0; P = .062 and .006); these associations persisted even after adjusting for postdialysis ECW/TBW (P = .056 and .028). Moreover, ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg was associated with increased cardiovascular mortalities independent of postdialysis ECW/TBW (P = .043). There was an independent association of volume status between considerable SBP decrease or increase during hemodialysis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Besides appropriate volume control, other factors related to BP changes during hemodialysis must be investigated.
分析期收缩压(SBP)变化与容积状态有关;然而,收缩压变化是否影响不良后果取决于容量状态仍不确定。我们回顾性地研究了维持性血液透析患者的舒张压、心血管结局和容量状态之间的关系。我们使用生物电阻抗分析确定了透析后收缩压变化(ΔSBP)减去透析前收缩压,以及细胞外水与全身水之比(ECW/TBW)的体积状态。82例(60.3%)为ΔSBP−20 ~ 10 mm Hg, 21例(15.4%)为ΔSBP≤- 20 mm Hg, 33例(24.3%)为ΔSBP≥10 mm Hg,中位随访时间为34个月。心血管事件多发于ΔSBP≤- 20 mm Hg和≥10 mm Hg的患者(风险比:2.3和3.0;P = 0.062和0.006);即使在调整透析后ECW/TBW后,这些相关性仍然存在(P = 0.056和0.028)。此外,ΔSBP≥10 mm Hg与心血管死亡率增加相关,与透析后ECW/TBW无关(P = 0.043)。血液透析期间收缩压显著降低或升高与心血管不良结局之间的容积状态存在独立关联。除了适当的容积控制外,血液透析过程中与血压变化有关的其他因素也必须加以研究。
期刊介绍:
Cessation.
The Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (JASH) publishes peer-reviewed articles on the topics of basic, applied and translational research on blood pressure, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders and factors; as well as clinical research and clinical trials in hypertension. Original research studies, reviews, hypotheses, editorial commentary and special reports spanning the spectrum of human and experimental animal and tissue research will be considered. All research studies must have been conducted following animal welfare guidelines. Studies involving human subjects or tissues must have received approval of the appropriate institutional committee charged with oversight of human studies and informed consent must be obtained.