C Pierpaoli, N Foschi, C Cagnetti, L Ferrante, T Manzoni, G Polonara, M Fabri
{"title":"Imitation Strategies in Callosotomized Patients.","authors":"C Pierpaoli, N Foschi, C Cagnetti, L Ferrante, T Manzoni, G Polonara, M Fabri","doi":"10.12871/00039829201812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imitation is a human ability rooted in early life. It allows people to interact with each other by observing and reproducing simple and complex movements alike. Imitation can occur in at least two forms: the rst, de ned as anatomical, seems to be based primarily on the mental construct of the \"body schema\" because the imitating movement corresponds precisely to the imitated movement in bodily terms, but not in terms of spatial compatibility. For example, a right arm movement of a model is imitated with a right arm movement by a facing imitator in a spatially incompatible fashion. The other form, de ned as specular or mirror-mode, involves a spatially compatible matching between imitated and imitating movements, as when an imitator moves her right arm upon viewing a corresponding left arm movement of a facing model (Chiavarino et al., 2007). In a previous study, healthy subjects showed a slight (61%) preference for the specular mode when freely imitating meaningful and meaningless gestures, whereas they strongly preferred the anatomical mode (93%) when given an intentionally ambiguous instruction such as \"use the same (or the opposite) limb as the model\" (Pierpaoli et al., 2014). In the present investigation it has been shown that callosotomized patients tended to favour the mirror-mode in both the free (66%) and the instructed condition (61% responses in driven sessions) regardless instructions given by the experimenter. Moreover, present data suggest that the extent of the callosotomy may in uence the patient's performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55476,"journal":{"name":"Archives Italiennes De Biologie","volume":"156 1-2","pages":"12-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives Italiennes De Biologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12871/00039829201812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Imitation is a human ability rooted in early life. It allows people to interact with each other by observing and reproducing simple and complex movements alike. Imitation can occur in at least two forms: the rst, de ned as anatomical, seems to be based primarily on the mental construct of the "body schema" because the imitating movement corresponds precisely to the imitated movement in bodily terms, but not in terms of spatial compatibility. For example, a right arm movement of a model is imitated with a right arm movement by a facing imitator in a spatially incompatible fashion. The other form, de ned as specular or mirror-mode, involves a spatially compatible matching between imitated and imitating movements, as when an imitator moves her right arm upon viewing a corresponding left arm movement of a facing model (Chiavarino et al., 2007). In a previous study, healthy subjects showed a slight (61%) preference for the specular mode when freely imitating meaningful and meaningless gestures, whereas they strongly preferred the anatomical mode (93%) when given an intentionally ambiguous instruction such as "use the same (or the opposite) limb as the model" (Pierpaoli et al., 2014). In the present investigation it has been shown that callosotomized patients tended to favour the mirror-mode in both the free (66%) and the instructed condition (61% responses in driven sessions) regardless instructions given by the experimenter. Moreover, present data suggest that the extent of the callosotomy may in uence the patient's performance.
模仿是人类的一种能力,根植于幼年时期。它允许人们通过观察和复制简单和复杂的动作来相互交流。模仿至少可以以两种形式出现:第一种是解剖学上的,似乎主要基于“身体图式”的心理构造,因为模仿的动作在身体方面与被模仿的动作精确对应,但在空间兼容性方面则不然。例如,一个模型的右臂运动被一个面朝的模仿者以空间不相容的方式模仿右臂运动。另一种形式,被称为镜面模式或镜像模式,涉及模仿和模仿运动之间的空间兼容匹配,例如当模仿者在看到面对模型的相应左臂运动时移动她的右臂(Chiavarino等人,2007)。在之前的一项研究中,健康受试者在自由模仿有意义和无意义的手势时表现出轻微(61%)的镜面模式偏好,而当给予故意含糊的指示,如“使用相同(或相反)肢体作为模型”时,他们强烈倾向于解剖模式(93%)(Pierpaoli et al., 2014)。在目前的调查中,已经表明胼胝体切除的患者倾向于在自由(66%)和指示条件下(61%的反应在驱动的会话)的镜像模式,无论实验者给出的指示。此外,目前的数据表明胼胝体切开术的程度可能会影响患者的表现。
期刊介绍:
Archives Italiennes de Biologie - a Journal of Neuroscience- was founded in 1882 and represents one of the oldest neuroscience journals in the world. Archives publishes original contributions in all the fields of neuroscience, including neurophysiology, experimental neuroanatomy and electron microscopy, neurobiology, neurochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, functional brain imaging and behavioral science.
Archives Italiennes de Biologie also publishes monographic special issues that collect papers on a specific topic of interest in neuroscience as well as the proceedings of important scientific events.
Archives Italiennes de Biologie is published in 4 issues per year and is indexed in the major collections of biomedical journals, including Medline, PubMed, Current Contents, Excerpta Medica.