Imitation Strategies in Callosotomized Patients.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Archives Italiennes De Biologie Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI:10.12871/00039829201812
C Pierpaoli, N Foschi, C Cagnetti, L Ferrante, T Manzoni, G Polonara, M Fabri
{"title":"Imitation Strategies in Callosotomized Patients.","authors":"C Pierpaoli,&nbsp;N Foschi,&nbsp;C Cagnetti,&nbsp;L Ferrante,&nbsp;T Manzoni,&nbsp;G Polonara,&nbsp;M Fabri","doi":"10.12871/00039829201812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imitation is a human ability rooted in early life. It allows people to interact with each other by observing and reproducing simple and complex movements alike. Imitation can occur in at least two forms: the rst, de ned as anatomical, seems to be based primarily on the mental construct of the \"body schema\" because the imitating movement corresponds precisely to the imitated movement in bodily terms, but not in terms of spatial compatibility. For example, a right arm movement of a model is imitated with a right arm movement by a facing imitator in a spatially incompatible fashion. The other form, de ned as specular or mirror-mode, involves a spatially compatible matching between imitated and imitating movements, as when an imitator moves her right arm upon viewing a corresponding left arm movement of a facing model (Chiavarino et al., 2007). In a previous study, healthy subjects showed a slight (61%) preference for the specular mode when freely imitating meaningful and meaningless gestures, whereas they strongly preferred the anatomical mode (93%) when given an intentionally ambiguous instruction such as \"use the same (or the opposite) limb as the model\" (Pierpaoli et al., 2014). In the present investigation it has been shown that callosotomized patients tended to favour the mirror-mode in both the free (66%) and the instructed condition (61% responses in driven sessions) regardless instructions given by the experimenter. Moreover, present data suggest that the extent of the callosotomy may in uence the patient's performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55476,"journal":{"name":"Archives Italiennes De Biologie","volume":"156 1-2","pages":"12-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives Italiennes De Biologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12871/00039829201812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Imitation is a human ability rooted in early life. It allows people to interact with each other by observing and reproducing simple and complex movements alike. Imitation can occur in at least two forms: the rst, de ned as anatomical, seems to be based primarily on the mental construct of the "body schema" because the imitating movement corresponds precisely to the imitated movement in bodily terms, but not in terms of spatial compatibility. For example, a right arm movement of a model is imitated with a right arm movement by a facing imitator in a spatially incompatible fashion. The other form, de ned as specular or mirror-mode, involves a spatially compatible matching between imitated and imitating movements, as when an imitator moves her right arm upon viewing a corresponding left arm movement of a facing model (Chiavarino et al., 2007). In a previous study, healthy subjects showed a slight (61%) preference for the specular mode when freely imitating meaningful and meaningless gestures, whereas they strongly preferred the anatomical mode (93%) when given an intentionally ambiguous instruction such as "use the same (or the opposite) limb as the model" (Pierpaoli et al., 2014). In the present investigation it has been shown that callosotomized patients tended to favour the mirror-mode in both the free (66%) and the instructed condition (61% responses in driven sessions) regardless instructions given by the experimenter. Moreover, present data suggest that the extent of the callosotomy may in uence the patient's performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胼胝体切除患者的模仿策略。
模仿是人类的一种能力,根植于幼年时期。它允许人们通过观察和复制简单和复杂的动作来相互交流。模仿至少可以以两种形式出现:第一种是解剖学上的,似乎主要基于“身体图式”的心理构造,因为模仿的动作在身体方面与被模仿的动作精确对应,但在空间兼容性方面则不然。例如,一个模型的右臂运动被一个面朝的模仿者以空间不相容的方式模仿右臂运动。另一种形式,被称为镜面模式或镜像模式,涉及模仿和模仿运动之间的空间兼容匹配,例如当模仿者在看到面对模型的相应左臂运动时移动她的右臂(Chiavarino等人,2007)。在之前的一项研究中,健康受试者在自由模仿有意义和无意义的手势时表现出轻微(61%)的镜面模式偏好,而当给予故意含糊的指示,如“使用相同(或相反)肢体作为模型”时,他们强烈倾向于解剖模式(93%)(Pierpaoli et al., 2014)。在目前的调查中,已经表明胼胝体切除的患者倾向于在自由(66%)和指示条件下(61%的反应在驱动的会话)的镜像模式,无论实验者给出的指示。此外,目前的数据表明胼胝体切开术的程度可能会影响患者的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives Italiennes De Biologie
Archives Italiennes De Biologie 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
30.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives Italiennes de Biologie - a Journal of Neuroscience- was founded in 1882 and represents one of the oldest neuroscience journals in the world. Archives publishes original contributions in all the fields of neuroscience, including neurophysiology, experimental neuroanatomy and electron microscopy, neurobiology, neurochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, functional brain imaging and behavioral science. Archives Italiennes de Biologie also publishes monographic special issues that collect papers on a specific topic of interest in neuroscience as well as the proceedings of important scientific events. Archives Italiennes de Biologie is published in 4 issues per year and is indexed in the major collections of biomedical journals, including Medline, PubMed, Current Contents, Excerpta Medica.
期刊最新文献
The potential effects of nutrients and light on autophagy-mediated visual function and clearance of retinal aggregates. Effects of thymoquinone on spinal cord injury in rats. Proflactic effects of rosmarinic acid on spinal cord injury in rats. Audiological evaluation of the cochlear nerve with brainstem evoked response audiometry in patients with COVID-19. Evaluation of daily Laurus nobilis tea consumption on anxiety and stress biomarkers in healthy volunteers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1