Awe as a Scientific Emotion

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2018-07-28 DOI:10.1111/cogs.12648
Sara Gottlieb, Dacher Keltner, Tania Lombrozo
{"title":"Awe as a Scientific Emotion","authors":"Sara Gottlieb,&nbsp;Dacher Keltner,&nbsp;Tania Lombrozo","doi":"10.1111/cogs.12648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Awe has traditionally been considered a religious or spiritual emotion, yet scientists often report that awe motivates them to answer questions about the natural world, and to do so in naturalistic terms. Indeed, awe may be closely related to scientific discovery and theoretical advance. Awe is typically triggered by something vast (either literally or metaphorically) and initiates processes of accommodation, in which existing mental schemas are revised to make sense of the awe-inspiring stimuli. This process of accommodation is essential for the kind of belief revision that characterizes scientific reasoning and theory change. Across six studies, we find that the tendency to experience awe is positively associated with scientific thinking, and that this association is not shared by other positive emotions. Specifically, we show that the disposition to experience awe predicts a more accurate understanding of how science works, rejection of creationism, and rejection of unwarranted teleological explanations more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"42 6","pages":"2081-2094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/cogs.12648","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.12648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Awe has traditionally been considered a religious or spiritual emotion, yet scientists often report that awe motivates them to answer questions about the natural world, and to do so in naturalistic terms. Indeed, awe may be closely related to scientific discovery and theoretical advance. Awe is typically triggered by something vast (either literally or metaphorically) and initiates processes of accommodation, in which existing mental schemas are revised to make sense of the awe-inspiring stimuli. This process of accommodation is essential for the kind of belief revision that characterizes scientific reasoning and theory change. Across six studies, we find that the tendency to experience awe is positively associated with scientific thinking, and that this association is not shared by other positive emotions. Specifically, we show that the disposition to experience awe predicts a more accurate understanding of how science works, rejection of creationism, and rejection of unwarranted teleological explanations more broadly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
敬畏是一种科学情感
敬畏传统上被认为是一种宗教或精神情感,然而科学家们经常报告说,敬畏激励他们回答有关自然世界的问题,并且用自然主义的方式来回答。的确,敬畏可能与科学发现和理论进步密切相关。敬畏通常是由巨大的事物触发的(无论是字面上的还是隐喻上的),并启动适应过程,在这个过程中,现有的心理图式被修改以理解令人敬畏的刺激。这种适应过程对于科学推理和理论变化所特有的信念修正是必不可少的。在六项研究中,我们发现敬畏的倾向与科学思维呈正相关,而这种关联并不为其他积极情绪所共享。具体来说,我们表明,体验敬畏的倾向预示着对科学如何运作的更准确的理解,拒绝神创论,更广泛地拒绝无根据的目的论解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
期刊最新文献
Musical Experience and Speech Processing: The Case of Whistled Words Prayer and Perceptual (and Other) Experiences Correction to “Does Momentary Outcome-Based Reflection Shape Bioethical Views? A Pre-Post Intervention Design” Perceptual Cue Weighting Matters in Real-Time Integration of Acoustic Information During Spoken Word Recognition On the Interplay Between Interpretation and Reasoning in Compelling Fallacies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1