Explicit Attitudes, Working Memory Capacity, and Driving After Drinking.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-15 DOI:10.1111/acer.13856
Laura E Hatz, Kayleigh N McCarty, Bruce D Bartholow, Denis M McCarthy
{"title":"Explicit Attitudes, Working Memory Capacity, and Driving After Drinking.","authors":"Laura E Hatz,&nbsp;Kayleigh N McCarty,&nbsp;Bruce D Bartholow,&nbsp;Denis M McCarthy","doi":"10.1111/acer.13856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attitudes toward driving after drinking are strongly predictive of drinking and driving behavior. This study tested working memory capacity (WMC) as a moderator of the association between attitudes and drinking and driving behavior. Consistent with dual process models of cognition, we hypothesized that the association between perceived danger and drinking and driving would be stronger for individuals with higher WMC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N = 161) enrolled in larger alcohol administration study were randomly assigned to an alcohol (n = 57), placebol (n = 52), or control (n = 52, not included) beverage condition. Past-year frequency of driving after drinking and WMC were assessed at baseline. Attitudes were assessed by asking participants to rate the perceived danger of driving at their current level of intoxication twice on the ascending limb (AL1, AL2), at peak breath alcohol concentration (BrAC), and twice on the descending limb (DL1, DL2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses across the BrAC curve indicated that the hypothesized interaction was observed for the alcohol but not placebo condition. Analyses for each assessment point indicated that the interaction was significant for the ascending limb and peak BrAC. In the alcohol condition, for those higher in WMC, lower perceived dangerousness was strongly associated with increased driving after drinking (AL1: incident rate ratios [IRR] = 5.87, Wald's χ<sup>2</sup>  = 12.39, p = 0.006, 95% CI [2.19, 15.75]; AL2: IRR = 8.17, Wald's χ<sup>2</sup>  = 11.39, p = 0.001, 95% CI [2.41, 27.66]; Peak: IRR = 5.11, Wald's χ<sup>2</sup>  = 9.84, p = 0.002, 95% CI [1.84, 14.16]). Associations were not significant at low WMC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that individuals higher in WMC are more likely to act consistently with their explicit attitudes toward drinking and driving. Findings may have implications for existing drinking and driving interventions and suggest the potential for novel interventions targeting implicit associations or WMC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7410,"journal":{"name":"Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/acer.13856","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Attitudes toward driving after drinking are strongly predictive of drinking and driving behavior. This study tested working memory capacity (WMC) as a moderator of the association between attitudes and drinking and driving behavior. Consistent with dual process models of cognition, we hypothesized that the association between perceived danger and drinking and driving would be stronger for individuals with higher WMC.

Methods: Participants (N = 161) enrolled in larger alcohol administration study were randomly assigned to an alcohol (n = 57), placebol (n = 52), or control (n = 52, not included) beverage condition. Past-year frequency of driving after drinking and WMC were assessed at baseline. Attitudes were assessed by asking participants to rate the perceived danger of driving at their current level of intoxication twice on the ascending limb (AL1, AL2), at peak breath alcohol concentration (BrAC), and twice on the descending limb (DL1, DL2).

Results: Analyses across the BrAC curve indicated that the hypothesized interaction was observed for the alcohol but not placebo condition. Analyses for each assessment point indicated that the interaction was significant for the ascending limb and peak BrAC. In the alcohol condition, for those higher in WMC, lower perceived dangerousness was strongly associated with increased driving after drinking (AL1: incident rate ratios [IRR] = 5.87, Wald's χ2  = 12.39, p = 0.006, 95% CI [2.19, 15.75]; AL2: IRR = 8.17, Wald's χ2  = 11.39, p = 0.001, 95% CI [2.41, 27.66]; Peak: IRR = 5.11, Wald's χ2  = 9.84, p = 0.002, 95% CI [1.84, 14.16]). Associations were not significant at low WMC.

Conclusions: Results suggest that individuals higher in WMC are more likely to act consistently with their explicit attitudes toward drinking and driving. Findings may have implications for existing drinking and driving interventions and suggest the potential for novel interventions targeting implicit associations or WMC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外显态度、工作记忆容量与酒后驾驶。
背景:酒后驾车态度对酒后驾车行为具有很强的预测作用。本研究测试了工作记忆容量(WMC)作为态度与酒后驾驶行为之间关系的调节因子。与认知的双重过程模型一致,我们假设在WMC较高的个体中,感知危险与酒后驾驶之间的关联会更强。方法:参加大型酒精管理研究的参与者(N = 161)被随机分配到酒精(N = 57)、安慰剂(N = 52)或对照(N = 52,不包括在内)饮料条件。在基线上评估过去一年的酒后驾驶频率和WMC。通过要求参与者在他们当前的醉酒水平下对驾驶的感知危险进行两次评估,在上升肢体(AL1, AL2),在呼气酒精浓度峰值(BrAC),在下降肢体(DL1, DL2)。结果:对BrAC曲线的分析表明,在酒精条件下观察到假设的相互作用,而在安慰剂条件下没有。对各评价点的分析表明,BrAC的升肢和峰的相互作用显著。在酒精条件下,对于WMC较高的人,较低的危险感知与酒后驾驶增加密切相关(AL1:事发率比[IRR] = 5.87, Wald's χ2 = 12.39, p = 0.006, 95% CI [2.19, 15.75];AL2: IRR = 8.17,瓦尔德的χ2 = 11.39,p = 0.001, 95% CI (2.41, 27.66);峰:IRR = 5.11,瓦尔德的χ2 = 9.84,p = 0.002, 95% CI[1.84, 14.16])。低WMC的相关性不显著。结论:结果表明,WMC较高的个体更有可能采取与他们对酒驾的明确态度一致的行动。研究结果可能会对现有的饮酒和驾驶干预措施产生影响,并提示针对内隐关联或WMC的新干预措施的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
219
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research''s scope spans animal and human clinical research, epidemiological, experimental, policy, and historical research relating to any aspect of alcohol abuse, dependence, or alcoholism. This journal uses a multi-disciplinary approach in its scope of alcoholism, its causes, clinical and animal effect, consequences, patterns, treatments and recovery, predictors and prevention.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of a web-based computer-tailored intervention for prevention of binge drinking among Spanish adolescents. NOP receptor antagonists decrease alcohol drinking in the dark in C57BL/6J mice. Epigenome-wide DNA Methylation Association Analysis Identified Novel Loci in Peripheral Cells for Alcohol Consumption among European American Male Veterans. Cerebellar hypermetabolism in alcohol use disorder: compensatory mechanism or maladaptive plasticity? Unpacking Genetic Risk Pathways for College Student Alcohol Consumption: The Mediating Role of Impulsivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1