Burn Pain Management at Burn Unit of Yekatit 12 Hospitals, Addis Ababa.

Q2 Medicine Pain Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2018-07-04 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/1092650
Negashu Dadi Mengistu, Mohammed Suleiman Obsa, Leulayehu Akalu Gemeda
{"title":"Burn Pain Management at Burn Unit of Yekatit 12 Hospitals, Addis Ababa.","authors":"Negashu Dadi Mengistu,&nbsp;Mohammed Suleiman Obsa,&nbsp;Leulayehu Akalu Gemeda","doi":"10.1155/2018/1092650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burn pain is a unique and complex challenge for all health professionals and the patients. The only way to insure quality burn pain relief is the patient's self-report. Thus, assessment of severity of pain and its associated factors are important in treatment plan.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess severity of burn pain and associated factors in Yekatit 12 Hospitals burn unit from January 1, 2017, to March 30, 2017.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital based cross sectional study design was conducted. Data was collected by using structural questionnaires from all eligible patients, those admitted to burn unit of Yekatit 12 Hospital during the study period. Severity of burn pain was assessed by using numerical, facial, and behavioral pain scale measurement tools. Pain assessment scale was deployed for patients by data collectors before medication and dressing change. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify significant predictors based on p value less than 0.05 with 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62 burn patients were included in the study. 87.1% of the patients feel severe pain and 12.9% of the patients feel moderate pain. Pediatrics age groups were about 11 times more likely to feel severe pain than adults, and patients with TBSA ≥ 25% were about 8 times more likely to feel severe burn pain than those with TBSA < 25% [AOR = 7.773; CI 1.184, 51.043] (P = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>Majorities of burn patients had severe pain and burn pain was not appropriately treated. Therefore, appropriate pain management was strongly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":19786,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/1092650","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1092650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Burn pain is a unique and complex challenge for all health professionals and the patients. The only way to insure quality burn pain relief is the patient's self-report. Thus, assessment of severity of pain and its associated factors are important in treatment plan.

Objective: To assess severity of burn pain and associated factors in Yekatit 12 Hospitals burn unit from January 1, 2017, to March 30, 2017.

Methods: Hospital based cross sectional study design was conducted. Data was collected by using structural questionnaires from all eligible patients, those admitted to burn unit of Yekatit 12 Hospital during the study period. Severity of burn pain was assessed by using numerical, facial, and behavioral pain scale measurement tools. Pain assessment scale was deployed for patients by data collectors before medication and dressing change. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify significant predictors based on p value less than 0.05 with 95% confidence interval.

Results: A total of 62 burn patients were included in the study. 87.1% of the patients feel severe pain and 12.9% of the patients feel moderate pain. Pediatrics age groups were about 11 times more likely to feel severe pain than adults, and patients with TBSA ≥ 25% were about 8 times more likely to feel severe burn pain than those with TBSA < 25% [AOR = 7.773; CI 1.184, 51.043] (P = 0.033).

Conclusion and recommendation: Majorities of burn patients had severe pain and burn pain was not appropriately treated. Therefore, appropriate pain management was strongly recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚的斯亚贝巴Yekatit 12医院烧伤科的烧伤疼痛管理。
背景:烧伤疼痛是所有卫生专业人员和患者面临的独特而复杂的挑战。确保烧伤疼痛缓解质量的唯一方法是病人的自我报告。因此,评估疼痛的严重程度及其相关因素在治疗计划中是重要的。目的:评估2017年1月1日至2017年3月30日在Yekatit 12医院烧伤科的烧伤疼痛严重程度及相关因素。方法:采用基于医院的横断面研究设计。数据收集采用结构化问卷调查的所有符合条件的患者,这些患者在研究期间住在Yekatit 12医院的烧伤科。采用数字、面部和行为疼痛量表测量工具评估烧伤疼痛的严重程度。在给药和换药前,由数据收集人员对患者进行疼痛评估量表。采用多因素logistic回归分析,以p值< 0.05,置信区间为95%为判别显著性预测因子。结果:共纳入62例烧伤患者。87.1%的患者感到重度疼痛,12.9%的患者感到中度疼痛。儿科年龄组感到严重疼痛的可能性约为成人的11倍,TBSA≥25%的患者感到严重烧伤疼痛的可能性约为TBSA < 25%的患者的8倍[AOR = 7.773;[Ci 1.184, 51.043] (p = 0.033)。结论与建议:大多数烧伤患者有严重的疼痛,烧伤疼痛没有得到适当的治疗。因此,强烈建议适当的疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research and Treatment
Pain Research and Treatment Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of the LED Red Light Therapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders: Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Factors Associated with Postoperative Pain among Patients after Cardiac Surgery in the Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of Karachi, Pakistan. Lornoxicam with Low-Dose Ketamine versus Pethidine to Control Pain of Acute Renal Colic. Cryotherapy Reduced Postoperative Pain in Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Challenges in the Analysis of Longitudinal Pain Data: Practical Lessons from a Randomized Trial of Annular Closure in Lumbar Disc Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1