Rapid access clinic for unexplained lymphadenopathy and suspected malignancy: prospective analysis of 1000 patients.

Q2 Medicine BMC Hematology Pub Date : 2018-08-14 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12878-018-0109-0
Andrea Kühnl, David Cunningham, Margaret Hutka, Clare Peckitt, Hamoun Rozati, Federica Morano, Irene Chong, Angela Gillbanks, Andrew Wotherspoon, Michelle Harris, Tracey Murray, Ian Chau
{"title":"Rapid access clinic for unexplained lymphadenopathy and suspected malignancy: prospective analysis of 1000 patients.","authors":"Andrea Kühnl,&nbsp;David Cunningham,&nbsp;Margaret Hutka,&nbsp;Clare Peckitt,&nbsp;Hamoun Rozati,&nbsp;Federica Morano,&nbsp;Irene Chong,&nbsp;Angela Gillbanks,&nbsp;Andrew Wotherspoon,&nbsp;Michelle Harris,&nbsp;Tracey Murray,&nbsp;Ian Chau","doi":"10.1186/s12878-018-0109-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients presenting with peripheral lymphadenopathy, it is critical to effectively identify those with underlying cancer who require urgent specialist care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a large dataset of 1000 consecutive patients with unexplained lymphadenopathy referred between 2001 and 2009 to the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) rapid access lymph node diagnostic clinic (LNDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cancer was diagnosed in 14% of patients. Factors predictive for malignant disease were male sex, age, supraclavicular and multiple site involvement. Cancer-associated symptoms were present for a median of 8 weeks. The median time from referral to start of cancer therapy was 53 days. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) was performed in 83% of patients with malignancies. Sensitivity and specificity of FNA were limited (50 and 87%, respectively for any malignancy; 30 and 79%, respectively for lymphoma). The vast majority of cancer patients received diagnostic biopsies on the basis of suspicious clinical and ultrasound findings; the FNA result contributed to establishing the diagnosis in only 4 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, we demonstrate that Oncologist-led rapid access clinics are successful concepts to assess patients with unexplained lymphadenopathy. Our data suggest that a routine use of FNA should be reconsidered in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":37740,"journal":{"name":"BMC Hematology","volume":"18 ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12878-018-0109-0","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12878-018-0109-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: In patients presenting with peripheral lymphadenopathy, it is critical to effectively identify those with underlying cancer who require urgent specialist care.

Methods: We analyzed a large dataset of 1000 consecutive patients with unexplained lymphadenopathy referred between 2001 and 2009 to the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) rapid access lymph node diagnostic clinic (LNDC).

Results: Cancer was diagnosed in 14% of patients. Factors predictive for malignant disease were male sex, age, supraclavicular and multiple site involvement. Cancer-associated symptoms were present for a median of 8 weeks. The median time from referral to start of cancer therapy was 53 days. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) was performed in 83% of patients with malignancies. Sensitivity and specificity of FNA were limited (50 and 87%, respectively for any malignancy; 30 and 79%, respectively for lymphoma). The vast majority of cancer patients received diagnostic biopsies on the basis of suspicious clinical and ultrasound findings; the FNA result contributed to establishing the diagnosis in only 4 cases.

Conclusions: In conclusion, we demonstrate that Oncologist-led rapid access clinics are successful concepts to assess patients with unexplained lymphadenopathy. Our data suggest that a routine use of FNA should be reconsidered in this setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原因不明的淋巴结病和疑似恶性肿瘤的快速门诊:1000例患者的前瞻性分析。
背景:对于周围淋巴结病变患者,有效识别那些需要紧急专科治疗的潜在癌症患者是至关重要的。方法:我们分析了2001年至2009年期间在皇家马斯登医院(RMH)快速通道淋巴结诊断诊所(LNDC)连续转诊的1000例不明原因淋巴结病患者的大型数据集。结果:14%的患者被诊断为癌症。恶性疾病的预测因素为男性、年龄、锁骨上和多部位受累。癌症相关症状出现的时间中位数为8周。从转诊到开始癌症治疗的中位时间为53天。83%的恶性肿瘤患者采用了细针抽吸(FNA)。FNA对任何恶性肿瘤的敏感性和特异性均有限(分别为50%和87%);淋巴瘤分别为30%和79%)。绝大多数癌症患者在可疑的临床和超声检查结果的基础上接受了诊断性活检;FNA结果仅有助于4例的诊断。结论:总之,我们证明肿瘤学家领导的快速通道诊所是评估不明原因淋巴结病患者的成功概念。我们的数据表明,在这种情况下,应该重新考虑常规使用FNA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Hematology
BMC Hematology Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Hematology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on basic, experimental and clinical research related to hematology. The journal welcomes submissions on non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases, hemostasis and thrombosis, hematopoiesis, stem cells and transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Rapid and reliable detection of α-globin copy number variations by quantitative real-time PCR Correction to: Patterns of bone marrow aspiration confirmed hematological malignancies in Eritrean National Health Laboratory. Correction to: The impact of helicobacter pylori eradication on platelet counts of adult patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice and associated factors of blood donation among health care workers in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Health-related quality of life of adolescents with sickle cell disease in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1