Women's perspectives of mistreatment during childbirth at health facilities in Ghana: findings from a qualitative study.

Reproductive Health Matters Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-28 DOI:10.1080/09688080.2018.1502020
Ernest T Maya, Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh, Phyllis Dako-Gyeke, Caroline Badzi, Joshua P Vogel, Meghan A Bohren, Richard Adanu
{"title":"Women's perspectives of mistreatment during childbirth at health facilities in Ghana: findings from a qualitative study.","authors":"Ernest T Maya,&nbsp;Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh,&nbsp;Phyllis Dako-Gyeke,&nbsp;Caroline Badzi,&nbsp;Joshua P Vogel,&nbsp;Meghan A Bohren,&nbsp;Richard Adanu","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1502020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mistreatment of women during childbirth at health facilities violates their human rights and autonomy and may be associated with preventable maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity. In this paper, we explore women's perspectives on mistreatment during facility-based childbirth as part of a bigger World Health Organization (WHO) multi-country study for developing consensus definitions, and validating indicators and tools for measuring the burden of the phenomenon. Focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) were used to explore experiences of mistreatment from women who have ever given birth in a health facility in Koforidua and Nsawam, Ghana. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematic analysis conducted. A total of 39 IDIs and 10 FGDs involving 110 women in total were conducted. The major types of mistreatment identified were: verbal abuse (shouting, insults, and derogatory remarks), physical abuse (pinching, slapping) and abandonment and lack of support. Mistreatment was commonly experienced during the second stage of labour, especially amongst adolescents. Inability to push well during the second stage, disobedience to instructions from birth attendants, and not bringing prescribed items for childbirth (mama kit) often preceded mistreatment. Most women indicated that slapping and pinching were acceptable means to \"correct\" disobedient behaviours and encourage pushing. Women may avoid giving birth in health facilities in the future because of their own experiences of mistreatment, or hearing about another woman's experience of mistreatment. Consensus definitions, validated indicators and tools for measuring mistreatment are needed to measure prevalence and identify drivers and potential entry points to minimise the phenomenon and improve respectful care during childbirth.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 53","pages":"70-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1502020","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1502020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

Mistreatment of women during childbirth at health facilities violates their human rights and autonomy and may be associated with preventable maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity. In this paper, we explore women's perspectives on mistreatment during facility-based childbirth as part of a bigger World Health Organization (WHO) multi-country study for developing consensus definitions, and validating indicators and tools for measuring the burden of the phenomenon. Focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) were used to explore experiences of mistreatment from women who have ever given birth in a health facility in Koforidua and Nsawam, Ghana. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematic analysis conducted. A total of 39 IDIs and 10 FGDs involving 110 women in total were conducted. The major types of mistreatment identified were: verbal abuse (shouting, insults, and derogatory remarks), physical abuse (pinching, slapping) and abandonment and lack of support. Mistreatment was commonly experienced during the second stage of labour, especially amongst adolescents. Inability to push well during the second stage, disobedience to instructions from birth attendants, and not bringing prescribed items for childbirth (mama kit) often preceded mistreatment. Most women indicated that slapping and pinching were acceptable means to "correct" disobedient behaviours and encourage pushing. Women may avoid giving birth in health facilities in the future because of their own experiences of mistreatment, or hearing about another woman's experience of mistreatment. Consensus definitions, validated indicators and tools for measuring mistreatment are needed to measure prevalence and identify drivers and potential entry points to minimise the phenomenon and improve respectful care during childbirth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳妇女对保健机构分娩期间虐待的看法:一项定性研究的结果。
妇女在保健设施分娩期间受到虐待侵犯了她们的人权和自主权,并可能与可预防的孕产妇和新生儿死亡率和发病率有关。在本文中,作为世界卫生组织(WHO)一项更大的多国研究的一部分,我们探讨了妇女对设施分娩期间虐待的看法,以制定共识定义,并验证衡量这种现象负担的指标和工具。采用焦点小组讨论和深度访谈的方式,探讨了曾在加纳科福里杜瓦和恩萨瓦姆的卫生机构分娩的妇女遭受虐待的经历。对采访进行了录音、抄写和专题分析。总共进行了39次idi和10次fgd,共涉及110名妇女。被确定的主要虐待类型有:言语虐待(大喊大叫、侮辱和贬损言论)、身体虐待(掐、扇耳光)、遗弃和缺乏支持。虐待通常发生在分娩第二阶段,特别是在青少年中。在第二阶段不能很好地分娩,不服从助产士的指示,没有带规定的分娩用品(妈妈包),往往在虐待之前。大多数女性表示,打耳光和掐人是“纠正”不听话行为和鼓励推搡的可接受手段。妇女今后可能会因为自己遭受虐待的经历,或听说另一名妇女遭受虐待的经历而避免在卫生设施分娩。需要达成共识的定义、经过验证的指标和衡量虐待的工具,以衡量发生率,确定驱动因素和潜在切入点,最大限度地减少这一现象,并改善分娩期间的尊重护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters ( SRHM) promotes sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) globally through its journal and ''more than a journal'' activities. The Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters (SRHM) journal, formerly Reproductive Health Matters (RHM), is a peer-reviewed, international journal that explores emerging, neglected and marginalised topics and themes across the field of sexual and reproductive health and rights. It aims to publish original, relevant, and contemporary research, particularly from a feminist perspective, that can help inform the development of policies, laws and services to fulfil the rights and meet the sexual and reproductive health needs of people of all ages, gender identities and sexual orientations. SRHM publishes work that engages with fundamental dilemmas and debates in SRHR, highlighting multiple perspectives, acknowledging differences, and searching for new forms of consensus. SRHM strongly encourages research that explores experiences, values, information and issues from the point of view of those whose lives are affected. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based violence, young people, gender, sexuality and sexual rights.
期刊最新文献
4 Code Work: RAI-MDS, Measurement, Quality, and Work Organization in Long-Term Care Facilities in Ontario 1 Introduction 2 The Dematerialization of Fundamental Nursing Care in an Era of Managerial Reform 11 Seeking Disability Politics in Disability and Health-Related Non-profit Organizations 13 Nail Salons, Toxics, and Health: Organizing for a Better Work Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1